civillian
May 20th, 2008, 04:03 PM
This area of the forums seems to be the right place to ask this question, so here goes:
How much danger is there that I will brick my system if instead of installing fresh (latest) ubuntu I run dist-upgrade? I have only installed packages from the repos that are standard (although I have non-free and multiverse enabled in synaptic) and the only application I have installed myself (froum source) is libgpod 0.6.0?
I read some blogger's article saying as long as you kept an eye on old/dead/broken packages in your system you should be fine, but I hesitate to take the advice of one man, since I have used many other distros that offer a similar dist-upgrade system, and often I have been told it would be better to do fresh install, (although it's often a hassle, since I have perpetual issues with my hardware and setting up the base system can take a while; drivers and whatnot) most notably linux mint, which is a derivative of ubuntu.
Anyway, thankyou for your advice,
Civ: a returning ubuntu user.
How much danger is there that I will brick my system if instead of installing fresh (latest) ubuntu I run dist-upgrade? I have only installed packages from the repos that are standard (although I have non-free and multiverse enabled in synaptic) and the only application I have installed myself (froum source) is libgpod 0.6.0?
I read some blogger's article saying as long as you kept an eye on old/dead/broken packages in your system you should be fine, but I hesitate to take the advice of one man, since I have used many other distros that offer a similar dist-upgrade system, and often I have been told it would be better to do fresh install, (although it's often a hassle, since I have perpetual issues with my hardware and setting up the base system can take a while; drivers and whatnot) most notably linux mint, which is a derivative of ubuntu.
Anyway, thankyou for your advice,
Civ: a returning ubuntu user.