PDA

View Full Version : Adobe Drops Licensing Fees, Gives Away Flash For Devices



Midwest-Linux
May 1st, 2008, 05:59 AM
Adobe Drops Licensing Fees, Gives Away Flash For Devices
By Michael Calore EmailApril 30, 2008 | 11:01:00 PMCategories: Mobile

http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/04/adobe-drops-lic.html


Flash Software maker Adobe announced Thursday that it would drop many of the licensing requirements attached to its Flash technology, which is used to display video and audio content on the web. The new initiative, named the Open Screen Project, has five key components:

1. Adobe will remove license restrictions on SWF and FLV file formats. Outsiders can now build their own Flash player clones.

2. Adobe will also remove the licensing fees on its Flash player. Developers can now integrate Adobe's player into any device or application without paying a fee.

3. Porting layer APIs will be opened up. They've always been device-specific, so manufacturers have had to sign agreements with Adobe in order to include the Flash player on a particular device. By eliminating that requirement, Adobe is allowing anyone to put the Flash player on their device without even opening a dialog with the company.

4. Adobe will publish the protocols for Flash, so companies can build the content delivery systems for themselves. They no longer need to use Adobe's Flash server software.

5. Adobe will allow over-the-air updates of the Flash player. Providers and carriers can push out new player versions to their users.


Another potential beneficiary of the Open Screen Project is Linux. A great number of mobile devices are running Linux, and developers working on mobile video applications for the free operating system can now build for whatever device they'd like without the need to pursue licensing agreements or worry about device-specific players.

Midwest-Linux
May 1st, 2008, 06:02 AM
So does this mean flash can be included with Linux distros now?

And would this help with trying to get flash to work on Ubuntu Power PC's?

Or is this aimed more at mobile devices?


Either way it seems to be another win for Linux.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 06:59 AM
Awesome!
Now lets hope they do the same for shockwave :D
Nice work on Adobes front!

tamoneya
May 1st, 2008, 07:06 AM
This is awesome. I can't wait to get flash working well with my 64 bit systems. It has always been very hit or miss on 64 bit and even when it does work it is flakey.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 07:09 AM
Yeh, this is very good news for all of us...
Hopefully more stuff that was holding us back will do something similar to this.
Hey I dont care if some stuff is still proprietary, as long as some open support is there.

mips
May 1st, 2008, 09:41 AM
This is really good news, especially 1,3&4. Linux developers will now have access to the protocols and they can build their own flash players with this assistance. This can only be good for projects like gnash, swfdec etc. Also means we can expect flash to be ported to other architectures like PPC, Sparc & 64bit cpus.

Adobe has obviously come to the conclusion that to win format wars etc they have to open up more, good for them.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 10:13 AM
Yeh with silverlight out there adobe has to make itself look good for developers.

smoker
May 1st, 2008, 10:30 AM
Adobe has obviously come to the conclusion that to win format wars etc they have to open up more, good for them.

ditto to that,:)

forceofnature
May 1st, 2008, 02:39 PM
Sorry if this has been posted before but Adobe is opening its Flash source code today. Looks like they are heading off MS silverlight.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/04/30/Adobe-opening-up-Flash_1.html

Wobedraggled
May 1st, 2008, 04:03 PM
Good news for the wii web browser as well.

mips
May 1st, 2008, 04:23 PM
Straight from the horses mouth:

http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/

SWF FILE FORMAT SPECIFICATION (VERSION 9)
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf/
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf/pdf/swf_file_format_spec_v9.pdf

VIDEO FILE FORMAT SPECIFICATION (VERSION 9)
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flv/
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flv/pdf/video_file_format_spec_v9.pdf

sports fan Matt
May 1st, 2008, 04:27 PM
Beautiful news..They finally it looks like realized :)

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 04:30 PM
Yeh, but its still great news no matter how you look at it.
this means that all current open source alternatives to flash can progress, and that is good for all of us including adobe.
Hey this means we no longer have to feel guilty about using flash, and thats good enough for me, even if flash itself never goes 100% open its implementation has practically done so, and all and all its still great progress nonetheless.

k99goran
May 1st, 2008, 05:30 PM
Wouldn't built-in flash playback support in Firefox be the best solution?
It would of course also imply out-of-the-box flash playback in Ubuntu.

At any rate, I look forward to the day when flash support is as ubiquitous and non-controversial as PDF support.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 05:41 PM
Wouldn't built-in flash playback support in Firefox be the best solution?
It would of course also imply out-of-the-box flash playback in Ubuntu.

At any rate, I look forward to the day when flash support is as ubiquitous and non-controversial as PDF support.

well there are some architectures that dont get flash that well like 64, but this means they can finally catch up :D

popch
May 1st, 2008, 08:20 PM
Thank you, MicroSoft, for adding a bit of competition.

SuperSon!c
May 1st, 2008, 09:41 PM
Sorry if this has been posted before but Adobe is opening its Flash source code today. Looks like they are heading off MS silverlight.

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/04/30/Adobe-opening-up-Flash_1.html

wth? first post.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 09:49 PM
Thank you, MicroSoft, for adding a bit of competition.

Yeh, MS could be the one indirectly responsible for this thanks to silverlight giving adobe some heat...
So I guess... Thanks Bill Gates?

This is confusing! :D

popch
May 1st, 2008, 09:53 PM
Thanks Bill Gates?

No, no, no! This one's retired. Try thanking Chief Balmer.

SunnyRabbiera
May 1st, 2008, 09:55 PM
No, no, no! This one's retired. Try thanking Chief Balmer.

GAWD, thats even harder then saying thanks to Bill Gates!