PDA

View Full Version : Super PI Ubuntu - How fast is your cpu?



Pages : [1] 2 3 4

sapo
August 27th, 2005, 08:27 AM
SuperPi is a quick and easy way to measure processor / chipset performance.

You can Download the linux version here:

ftp://pi.super-computing.org/Linux/super_pi.tar.gz

Just untar and run the command as:


./super_pi 20

Then post a screenshot of your results or paste it :-P

I didnt know that there was a superpi for linux, i used to use it in windows to test my overclock.. my new cpu arrived today and i tested my first overlclock:

A64 2800+ @ 2ghz s754 + Mobo Epox 8KRDA3J Running Hoary x86

http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/7343/superpi7dx.jpg

Please post your score :grin:

xmastree
August 27th, 2005, 09:06 AM
Athlon 2400+, Asus A7V8X-X, 512MB:

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.789 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.541 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.947 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.984 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.940 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.924 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.971 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.941 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.927 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.936 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.978 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.959 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.985 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.981 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.979 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.974 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.957 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.944 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.862 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.640 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 58.543 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.200 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 58.743( 2.027) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 16:05:23 PHT 2005

Astrophobos
August 27th, 2005, 03:35 PM
Athlon64 3500+, Abit AV8, 1Gb


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.432 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.351 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.547 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.546 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.551 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.546 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.574 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.547 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.545 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.578 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.546 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.554 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.543 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.558 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.568 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.535 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.511 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.489 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.377 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 30.693 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.165 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.858( 0.703) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : sam aoû 27 10:31:56 EDT 2005

Heliode
August 27th, 2005, 03:36 PM
------ Started super_pi run : za aug 27 16:35:05 CEST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.554 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.734 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.979 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.986 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.975 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.983 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.978 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.973 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.982 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.997 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.969 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.976 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.967 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.935 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.901 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.744 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 39.124 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.264 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 39.388( 0.983) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : za aug 27 16:35:45 CEST 2005


On a Pentium 4 3.0 Ghz HT (and SMP kernel)

NoTiG
August 27th, 2005, 04:50 PM
just fyi ,the 7 ghz cpu that was recently overclocked... did pi up to a million spaces in about 18 seconds

drizek
August 27th, 2005, 06:55 PM
just fyi ,the 7 ghz cpu that was recently overclocked... did pi up to a million spaces in about 18 seconds
using the windows client in win 2k, i got 55s on an athlon 2800 OC'd to 2.2ghz. ill compare that to ubuntu once i restart.

az
August 27th, 2005, 09:02 PM
Pentium III, 700Mzh, 256Megs pc100 RAM.



End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 154.542 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.672 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 155.213( 5.470) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 16:00:28 EDT 2005
dora@dora:~/Desktop$

WildTangent
August 28th, 2005, 01:05 AM
Athlon 3000+, MSI RS480M2-IL, 512MB (64 taken by graphics)


- Not calculated. [ 16K]
- Not calculated. [ 32K]
- Not calculated. [ 64K]
- Not calculated. [ 128K]
- Not calculated. [ 256K]
- Not calculated. [ 512K]
+ 000h 00m 51s [ 1M]
- Not calculated. [ 2M]
- Not calculated. [ 4M]
- Not calculated. [ 8M]
- Not calculated. [ 16M]
- Not calculated. [ 32M]

thats with the windows client, all it gave me was that list. ill try it later with less stuff running, and maybe with the graphics memory reduced :P

-Wild

mstlyevil
August 28th, 2005, 02:11 AM
Athlon XP 2500 @ 3200 2.2 GH.
K7N2 Delta MSI Nvidia Nforce 2



------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 20:07:00 CDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.802 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.083 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.074 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.095 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.073 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.093 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.077 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.078 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.089 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.073 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.100 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.074 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.073 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.082 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.069 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.077 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.985 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.870 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 41.123 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.179 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 41.302( 1.339) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 20:07:42 CDT 2005

Sam
August 28th, 2005, 02:17 AM
Athlon64 3400+ / ASUS K8N-E / 1Go

With X:

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Aug 28 03:17:25 CEST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.585 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.617 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.758 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.755 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.748 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.731 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.713 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.749 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.752 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.750 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.749 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.770 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.750 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.742 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.760 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.715 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.731 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.740 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.665 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.560 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.748 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.154 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.902( 0.915) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Aug 28 03:18:01 CEST 2005

Without X:

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.559 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.651 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.657 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.653 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.655 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.664 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.652 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.651 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.669 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.651 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.651 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.675 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.657 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.647 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.665 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.627 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.597 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.474 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 32.916 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.150 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.066( 0.806) Sec.

matthew
August 28th, 2005, 02:24 AM
Okay, I'll be the first to post results from a Pentium M (745 1.8GHz)


------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 18:20:56 MST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.301 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.654 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.843 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.841 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.839 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.857 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.845 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.849 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.837 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.843 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.853 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.838 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.835 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.847 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.833 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.838 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.801 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.758 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.673 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.250 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.219 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.469( 0.968 ) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 18:21:36 MST 2005

matthew
August 28th, 2005, 02:25 AM
Hopefully this isn't a duplicate post. If it is, feel free to delete...

EDIT: It was...but I can't seem to delete it. Mods, feel free to delete this post and the other dupe as well.

qalimas
August 28th, 2005, 02:28 AM
Athlon XP 2500+
512 PC 2700
Albatron Motherboard (model unknown)


keith@keith:~$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 20:26:05 CDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.784 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.399 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.899 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.810 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.813 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.835 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.779 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.890 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.836 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.720 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.861 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.838 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.908 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.779 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.968 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.854 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.792 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.811 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.688 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.518 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 56.000 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.204 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 56.204( 2.136) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 20:27:34 CDT 2005

matthew
August 28th, 2005, 03:10 AM
This is my third try...I can see my posts and replies to other threads tonight, but my replies here don't seem to be showing up. If this is another dupe we can delete it. Last try this thread tonight...

EDIT: This is another dupe. Don't know why I couldn't see the second page for a long time. Weird. Anyway, since I seem to be unable to delete my post tonight mods have permissions and invitation to do so.

Sam
August 28th, 2005, 03:13 AM
This is my third try...I can see my posts and replies to other threads tonight, but my replies here don't seem to be showing up. If this is another dupe we can delete it. Last try this thread tonight...

I have a Pentium M (745 1.8GHz)

------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 18:20:56 MST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.301 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.654 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.843 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.841 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.839 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.857 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.845 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.849 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.837 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.843 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.853 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.838 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.835 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.847 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.833 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.838 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.801 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.758 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.673 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.250 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.219 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.469( 0.968) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 18:21:36 MST 2005
I see your three replies without problems. You can delete the last two.

professor_chaos
August 28th, 2005, 03:33 AM
amd 3200+


------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 20:16:16 MDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.653 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.139 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.465 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.462 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.477 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.458 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.474 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.465 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.471 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.464 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.470 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.478 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.458 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.474 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.461 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.458 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.442 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.429 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.229 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 48.797 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.174 Sec.

benplaut
August 28th, 2005, 03:34 AM
Pentium M 1.5, 768mb RAM

http://img351.imageshack.us/img351/4237/pi3ep.png

RastaMahata
August 28th, 2005, 03:40 AM
Athlon XP 1700+, 256 MB Ram (2100), nforce2 400 chipset.

------ Started super_pi run : sáb ago 27 22:39:39 CLT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.894 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.821 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.240 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.237 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.247 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.248 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.238 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.244 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.244 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.232 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.254 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.242 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.234 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.253 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.238 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.226 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.224 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.199 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.087 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.871 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 64.046 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.264 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 64.310( 2.019) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : sáb ago 27 22:40:44 CLT 2005I think I need an upgrade. Now.

matthew
August 28th, 2005, 03:47 AM
I see your three replies without problems. You can delete the last two.
Thanks. I can finally see them as well.

arnieboy
August 28th, 2005, 03:48 AM
Mine is a P4 3.00 GHz
PM-800 motherboard
512 MB RAM


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.479 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.459 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.670 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.662 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.673 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.663 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.679 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.664 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.673 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.675 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.678 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.662 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.667 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.656 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.653 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.646 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.621 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.570 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.485 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 32.922 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.193 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.115( 1.074) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 22:47:09 EDT 2005

joaoeb
August 28th, 2005, 04:16 AM
P4 2.8, RAM 512, HT enabled, Kernel: 2.6.10-5-686-smp
Motherboard: Asus P4P800


------ Started super_pi run : Dom Ago 28 00:08:46 BRT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.613 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.865 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.055 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.055 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.059 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.079 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.065 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.058 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.095 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.054 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.058 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.053 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.075 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.067 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.045 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.001 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.966 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.817 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.785 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.201 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 40.986( 1.026) Sec.

Praetorian
August 28th, 2005, 11:22 AM
AMD 3000+ kernel: AMD K7 2.6.10-7
Motherboard Asus K8V SE Deluxe

------ Started super_pi run : zo aug 28 12:16:05 CEST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.501 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.606 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.826 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.813 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.834 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.814 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.813 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.839 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.813 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.831 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.814 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.807 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.826 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.803 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.774 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.747 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.613 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 35.938 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.182 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 36.120( 0.916) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : zo aug 28 12:16:42 CEST 2005

tesna
September 19th, 2005, 04:25 AM
P4 3.0 ghz, HTT enabled, 1 GB ram.

[tesna@localhost superpi]$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 19 10:15:08 WIT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.457 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.673 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.659 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.665 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.660 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.673 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.659 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.652 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.662 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.657 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.649 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.657 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.657 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.659 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.649 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.627 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.574 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.479 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 32.833 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.171 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.004( 1.018) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 19 10:15:41 WIT 2005

wmcbrine
September 19th, 2005, 04:43 AM
I'll run this when it's open source.

dtfinch
September 19th, 2005, 05:16 AM
If you want to see how slow a Dell Dimension 2400 with a 2.4ghz Celeron is:

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -M noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Sep 18 21:01:10 PDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.050 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.373 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.843 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.832 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.854 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.864 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.852 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.832 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.861 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.849 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.859 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.828 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.850 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.855 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.847 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.819 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.821 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.769 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.636 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.343 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 75.896 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.235 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 76.131( 2.206) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Sep 18 21:02:27 PDT 2005

John.Michael.Kane
September 19th, 2005, 05:34 AM
Centrino 1.3ghz 512ram

------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 19 00:28:22 EDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.745 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.875 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.888 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.872 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.886 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.876 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.895 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.893 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.872 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.899 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.872 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.893 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.875 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.887 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.862 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.857 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.833 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.749 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.629 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 56.871 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.312 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 57.183( 1.266) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 19 00:29:21 EDT 2005

Galoot
September 19th, 2005, 05:50 AM
Pentium III, 700Mzh, 256Megs pc100 RAM.

End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 154.542 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.672 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 155.213( 5.470) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 27 16:00:28 EDT 2005
dora@dora:~/Desktop$
Hmph! Showoff.

Celeron Coppermine, 566 MHz, 128 MB RAM

End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 203.008 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.863 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 203.871( 6.345) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Sep 18 21:27:28 PDT 2005

skoal
September 19th, 2005, 06:41 AM
End of calculation. Time= 62.937 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.300 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 63.237( 3.665) Sec.

on P4-1.7GoogleHertz...

By the way, did you know that PI is exactly 3.0? Any great chef will tell you that. They only use the mathematical value when calculating the ingredients for a cherry PI dish, leaving you the tasty dish crumbs as the remainder, and also as a reminder...

\\//_

benplaut
September 19th, 2005, 06:46 AM
By the way, did you know that PI is exactly 3.0? Any great chef will tell you that. They only use the mathematical value when calculating the ingredients for a cherry PI dish, leaving you the tasty dish crumbs as the remainder, and also as a reminder...

\\//_

yes, it's common knowledge, but the mathmaticians don't like to admit it :wink:

vayu
September 19th, 2005, 06:47 AM
Very old Pentium 4, 2.0 ghz, 256MB RAM:
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.888 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.353 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.293 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.379 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.338 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.296 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.372 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.277 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.296 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.386 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.342 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.298 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.373 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.263 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.286 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.341 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.247 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.126 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.897 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 65.532 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.520 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 66.052( 1.316) Sec.

vayu
September 19th, 2005, 06:49 AM
Pentium M730 1.6ghz, 512MB RAM:
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.703 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.895 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.878 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.881 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.898 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.881 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.880 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.880 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.905 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.878 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.877 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.915 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.873 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.895 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.858 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.832 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.676 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.716 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.239 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.955( 1.011) Sec.

Teroedni
September 19th, 2005, 08:09 AM
AMDXP2600+ 1GIG 2700DDR RAM Asus a7n8x


teroedni@AMDXP:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : må sep 19 09:06:17 CEST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.625 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.981 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.277 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.273 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.267 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.265 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.278 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.269 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.273 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.268 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.238 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.224 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.153 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.006 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 44.818 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.185 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 45.003( 1.294) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : må sep 19 09:07:05 CEST 2005
teroedni@AMDXP:~/Desktop$

Teroedni
September 19th, 2005, 09:06 AM
And here is my Blazing Fast Pentium 2 processor operating on a 350mhz clocl;) with a mixed bag of sdram
(368mb 100mhz) on a Msi 6119 slot 1 motherboard

teroedni@teroedni:~$ cd Desktop
teroedni@teroedni:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : må sep 19 09:54:38 CEST 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 3.688 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 11.261 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 12.945 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 12.911 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 12.923 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 12.924 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 12.926 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 12.924 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 12.922 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 12.924 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 12.928 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 12.910 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 12.915 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 12.881 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 12.902 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 12.855 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 12.770 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 12.600 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 12.214 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 11.338 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 254.784 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 1.271 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 256.055( 8.034) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : må sep 19 09:58:58 CEST 2005
:roll:

kingsidy
September 21st, 2005, 10:27 PM
hey, pentium M 1.5 GHZ, 1 gig Ram, Ubuntu Breezy Kernel 2.6.12-8-686

------ Started super_pi run : Wed Sep 21 17:21:34 EDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.457 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.942 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.273 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.271 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.272 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.272 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.270 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.269 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.268 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.266 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.267 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.255 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.245 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.212 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.165 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.034 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 45.580 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.252 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 45.832( 4.818) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Sep 21 17:22:21 EDT 2005

bob_c_b
September 21st, 2005, 11:15 PM
If you want to see how slow a Dell Dimension 2400 with a 2.4ghz Celeron is:

Northwood Celerons were a bummer, what board/chipset, maybe you can get a Celeron D or a PIV to drop in there?


My Celeron D 3.06@3.2


bob@phobos:~/progs/superpi$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Sep 21 18:10:27 EDT 2005
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.545 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.715 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.956 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.958 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.966 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.953 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.956 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.972 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.961 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.979 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.957 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.952 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.972 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.952 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.954 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.941 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.913 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.860 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.706 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 38.694 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.187 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 38.881( 0.984) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Sep 21 18:11:07 EDT 2005

flapane
November 29th, 2006, 11:18 PM
specs on my signature

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.664 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.188 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.634 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.140 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.774( 0.676) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : mer nov 29 23:18:10 CET 2006

why is faster than in windows?

Lord Illidan
November 29th, 2006, 11:27 PM
Yikes..why drag up this topic?

ixus_123
November 29th, 2006, 11:44 PM
Ah just the tread I was after :)

I've just overclocked my Sempron 2600 (1.6ghz to 2.13ghz) can't seem to get it higher than that & boot. Anyone know of any articles that would be worth reading to help me on my way?

Can't run the benchmark just yet - got to wait 15 minutes for some video encoding to finish

Dual Cortex
November 29th, 2006, 11:47 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 17:42:46 EST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.436 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.312 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.500 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.512 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.512 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.484 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.468 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.324 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 29.698 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.870( 0.796) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 17:43:16 EST 2006


P4 530 (3.0GHz, 800MHz FSB, HT)
512MB DDR2-400 RAM

ixus_123
November 30th, 2006, 12:22 AM
PC specs at end

kieren2@splendid:~/Desktop/benchmark$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 23:20:43 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.528 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.632 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.860 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.864 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.860 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.864 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.856 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.856 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.868 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.860 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.856 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.844 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.816 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.760 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.616 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 36.658 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.160 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 36.818( 0.968) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 23:21:20 GMT 2006

AMD Sempron 2600 1.6ghz overclocked to 2.13Ghz
512mb ram running at 266 speed (I think)it was 3200 ram but I have no idea what I've done to the timings. Basically flying blind with the overclocking thing

bastiegast
November 30th, 2006, 12:28 AM
With beryl and X running:


------ Started super_pi run : do nov 30 00:24:11 CET 2006
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.928 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.820 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.792 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.804 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.788 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.788 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.792 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.788 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.792 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.752 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.592 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 36.266 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.176 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 36.442( 0.796) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : do nov 30 00:25:02 CET 2006

Engnome
November 30th, 2006, 12:35 AM
Yikes..why drag up this topic?

Maybe he wanted to show off his nice hardware?

btw there is a program called pi in the repos. sudo apt-get install pi

futz
November 30th, 2006, 12:42 AM
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+, DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D, 1GB RAM
Very small overclock. This CPU is basically two 3500+ cores on a die, so I come in neck and neck with the 3500+ number I see near the top of the list. Just a tiny bit faster because of the very mild overclock. It's capable of a LOT more, but it needs better than stock cooling to get there (and survive for long) and I haven't gotten around to doing that yet.


End of calculation. Time= 30.198 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.152 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.350( 0.940) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 15:34:03 PST 2006

~LoKe
November 30th, 2006, 12:52 AM
E6300 @ Stock
7300 GT
1GB Corsair RAM


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.364 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.112 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.300 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.260 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.140 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 25.386 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.140 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 25.526( 0.852) Sec.

futz
November 30th, 2006, 01:00 AM
7300 GT
LOL! Dude, what video card you're running has no bearing on the speed of this test. What mainboard you're running might have some minor effect.

~LoKe
November 30th, 2006, 01:03 AM
LOL! Dude, what video card you're running has no bearing on the speed of this test. What mainboard you're running might have some minor effect.

Knew it wouldn't, but I usually include the most important (not necessarily relevant) specs.

Velotix
November 30th, 2006, 01:25 AM
For reference, my CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6600 running at the standard 2.4GHz.
If it makes any difference, I have 2GB RAM also.


****$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:16 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.316 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.880 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.780 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.756 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 16.229 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 16.333( 0.636) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:33 GMT 2006

Woo! I think that beats out everyone who's posted so far, and I know my processor's by no means the fastest in existence.

futz
November 30th, 2006, 01:35 AM
For reference, my CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6600 running at the standard 2.4GHz.

End of calculation. Time= 16.229 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 16.333( 0.636) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:33 GMT 2006[/code]

Woo! I think that beats out everyone who's posted so far, and I know my processor's by no means the fastest in existence.
Damn, those things are so quick! :mrgreen: Gotta sell off a few surplus boxes and put the $$ toward a new Intel build...

Dual Cortex
November 30th, 2006, 02:10 AM
Damn, those things are so quick! :mrgreen: Gotta sell off a few surplus boxes and put the $$ toward a new Intel build...

And it's not OC'ed!

iPower
November 30th, 2006, 03:13 AM
old IBM PC 300GL


------ Started super_pi run : tor nov 30 03:05:40 CET 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 2.768 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 8.565 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 9.813 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 9.837 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 9.817 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 9.837 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 9.821 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 9.813 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 9.793 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 9.837 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 9.809 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 9.797 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 9.813 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 9.797 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 9.761 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 9.761 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 9.713 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 9.589 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 9.273 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 8.625 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 193.508 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.900 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 194.408( 6.000) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : tor nov 30 03:09:05 CET 2006

WalmartSniperLX
November 30th, 2006, 04:52 AM
My AMD Sempron 64 3100+ on a Asus K8VMX/s VIA mobo :P and k7 kernel




------ Started super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 20:49:40 MST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.580 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.792 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.056 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.056 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.012 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.952 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.804 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.571 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.204 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 40.775( 1.016) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Nov 29 20:50:22 MST 2006

addicted68098
November 30th, 2006, 05:09 AM
Its amazing how fast these things work,
I made something simular in python, it didn't take a huge amount of time to do a thousand times, but pi was only to the twelth digit.

argie
November 30th, 2006, 07:08 AM
Intel 2.93Ghz, i386 kernel

------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 11:42:43 IST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.520 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.992 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.976 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.996 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.996 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.976 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.992 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.976 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.956 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.756 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 39.466 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.196 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 39.662( 1.260) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 11:43:32 IST 2006

dbbolton
November 30th, 2006, 08:02 AM
turion64 - 47 secs

Peepsalot
November 30th, 2006, 08:48 AM
Box 1 (Athlon XP 2000, 1.5gb RAM):
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 01:39:23 CST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.584 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.904 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.924 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.932 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.988 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.012 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.920 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.952 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.916 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.920 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.920 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.936 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.916 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.912 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.900 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.912 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.848 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.788 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.588 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 57.932 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.232 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 58.164( 1.828) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 01:40:21 CST 2006


Box 2 (Sempron 3000, 1gb ram):
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 01:42:25 CST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.536 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.924 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.940 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.932 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.940 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.940 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.932 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.920 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 38.222 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 38.406( 0.912) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 01:43:04 CST 2006

chaosgeisterchen
November 30th, 2006, 08:51 AM
Anyone in hold of an Core2Extreme E6800? I would love to see SuperPI under 15 seconds here, kudos to Intel for these awesome processors...

kuja
November 30th, 2006, 09:36 AM
super_pi on my Athlon 64 FX-60

kuja@terra:~/Linux/super_pi$ ./super_pi
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 03:33:39 EST 2006
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.368 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.208 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.240 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.398 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.136 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.534( 0.752) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 03:34:08 EST 2006

weresheep
November 30th, 2006, 10:08 AM
Can't believe a Core 2 Duo can do it in 16 seconds :shock:

Heres my work machine and my home server (run whilst logged in over the internet)...


Work
Intel Xeon 3.0GHz with HT enabled and 2MB L2 cache and 1GB RAM



Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 08:31:31 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.420 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.576 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.536 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.444 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 30.866 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.204 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.070( 0.804) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 08:32:02 GMT 2006



Home
Intel Pentium 133MHz with 1MB L2 cache and 256MB RAM



Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 08:35:48 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 11.089 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 35.030 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 40.079 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 40.071 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 40.095 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 40.075 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 40.075 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 40.071 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 40.046 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 40.063 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 40.038 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 40.026 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 40.007 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 39.982 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 39.915 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 39.795 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 39.530 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 38.962 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 37.818 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 35.314 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 790.029 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 3.644 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 793.674( 33.330) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 08:50:06 GMT 2006


Theres still life in my old P133 yet :mrgreen:

-weresheep

public_void
November 30th, 2006, 11:34 AM
Intel Centrino 1.6Ghz, 512MB RAM

------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 10:24:37 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.072 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.740 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.204 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.060 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.992 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.848 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.983 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.240 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 41.223( 1.036) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 10:25:21 GMT 2006

flapane
November 30th, 2006, 11:46 AM
For reference, my CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6600 running at the standard 2.4GHz.
If it makes any difference, I have 2GB RAM also.


****$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:16 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.316 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.880 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.780 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.756 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 16.229 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 16.333( 0.636) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:33 GMT 2006

Woo! I think that beats out everyone who's posted so far, and I know my processor's by no means the fastest in existence.

O.M.G....
Almost a half than my cpu (27secs)

flapane
November 30th, 2006, 11:47 AM
Yikes..why drag up this topic?

why not?

chaosgeisterchen
November 30th, 2006, 11:49 AM
why not?

What are you referring to?

flapane
November 30th, 2006, 12:14 PM
sorry, I edited the post

chaosgeisterchen
November 30th, 2006, 12:17 PM
sorry, I edited the post

No problem. It's always interesting to see how systems really perform.

flapane
November 30th, 2006, 12:30 PM
that's the reason.
Anyway it would be interesting to understand why superpi in linux is faster than in windows

chaosgeisterchen
November 30th, 2006, 12:33 PM
Well, the system itself could be such a lot faster, because of its construction. Does anyone thoroughly know the Linux architecture? And what about the Windows architecture?

Onyros
November 30th, 2006, 12:40 PM
My laptop's Pentium M 760 (2.0GHz, 2MB L2 cache) result, but I was actually playing some music and browsing with Opera.


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.464 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.564 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.568 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.420 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.186 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.188 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.374( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 11:37:26 WET 2006

louieb
November 30th, 2006, 12:47 PM
P2 400 384 mb ram.


lou@gameu:~/super_pi$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 05:39:44 CST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 3.308 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 10.141 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 11.593 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 11.597 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 11.593 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 11.605 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 11.585 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 11.581 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 11.597 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 11.593 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 11.581 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 11.593 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 11.493 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 11.541 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 11.521 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 11.493 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 11.425 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 11.249 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 10.945 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 10.177 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 228.318 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 1.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 229.482( 7.192) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 05:43:54 CST 2006


I will try it on a P1 200 128 mb. and I will go get breakfast and hope it is done when I get back.

drphilngood
November 30th, 2006, 01:49 PM
AMD x2 4800+(939) @ 2.4GHz


------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 07:44:26 UT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.180 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.012 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.708 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.668 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.652 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.608 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.512 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.866 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.152 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 35.018( 5.692) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 07:45:01 UT 2006

Rhubarb
November 30th, 2006, 07:50 PM
1.7 GHz Core Duo (Centrino Duo).
This programme is single threaded :(

Anyway, this is my score :-


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.432 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.428 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.444 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.444 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.444 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.336 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.216 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.918 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.066( 0.840) Sec.

-----------------------------------------

And this is what I got when running two instances of super_pi at the same time :) :-


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.416 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.652 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.664 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.660 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.656 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.660 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.664 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.668 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.628 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.620 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.632 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.568 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.476 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 32.594 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.156 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 32.750( 1.476) Sec.
... and the other thread:

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.476 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.668 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.668 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.656 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.668 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.608 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.484 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 33.062 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.152 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.214( 1.092) Sec.

drphilngood
November 30th, 2006, 08:28 PM
It´s hard to believe but I shaved just under two seconds off my time by disabling CPU frequency scaling.:D

AMD x2 4800+(939) @ 2.4GHz

------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 14:21:01 UT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.520 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.616 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.504 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 33.354 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.502( 5.008) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 14:21:35 UT 2006

thomashauk
November 30th, 2006, 08:33 PM
AMD Sempron 2800+ @ 800Mhz With rubbish cooling

59.780 seconds

Not so bad for an underclock and these days you can pick a laptop up of this spec for what? £200?

pmj
November 30th, 2006, 09:08 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 21:06:04 CET 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.284 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.728 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.828 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.820 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.832 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.836 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.828 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.828 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.824 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.820 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.816 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.840 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.832 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.816 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.812 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.820 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.768 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.712 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 16.309 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.108 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 16.417( 0.568) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 21:06:21 CET 2006

Edit: Core 2 Duo E6600, 2.4GHz

ixus_123
November 30th, 2006, 10:43 PM
PMJ - you forgot to mention what your CPU is

sibrand
November 30th, 2006, 11:44 PM
AMD Athlon64 3000+ (Venice) @ 2.6 GHz:

http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/6186/screenshotxc6.th.jpg (http://img400.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotxc6.jpg)

KaeseEs
December 1st, 2006, 12:51 AM
My setup:

Thinkpad T60
Core Duo 2.0 GHz
1 GB RAM

24.190 sec

When running 2 instances simultaneously, I get:

29.594 sec
29.250 sec

I assume the ~20% jump is due to the L2 cache being flooded, or something of that nature.

Skia_42
December 1st, 2006, 01:15 AM
2 Ghz Dual Processor:


skye@skye-laptop:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 17:13:24 MST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.360 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.080 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.208 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.208 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.208 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.208 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.204 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.192 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.092 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.022 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.136 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.158( 0.792) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 17:13:48 MST 2006

Milos_SD
December 1st, 2006, 02:38 AM
Intel Celeron D336 2.8Ghz and 512MB of RAM on Ubuntu 6.06 i386.

whynotchevron
December 1st, 2006, 03:26 AM
AMD athlon 64 3000+ , Biostar NF325A7 motherboard , 512 ram


------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 21:08:06 EST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.360 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.184 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.180 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.188 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.184 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.176 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.184 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.184 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.184 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.180 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.180 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.160 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.140 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.104 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.960 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 44.055 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.176 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 44.231( 1.264) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 21:08:50 EST 2006
*****@*****-desktop:~/super/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES$

Dual Cortex
December 1st, 2006, 04:22 AM
I'm starting to wonder how the heck did my computer get the following:

End of calculation. Time= 29.698 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.870( 0.796) Sec.

It's an ugly Netburst-ed PRESCOTT!
(P4 530)

futz
December 1st, 2006, 08:44 AM
Pentium 4 @ 3.36GHz - Gigabyte GA-8IPE1000-G - 1GB RAM
Running SabayonLinux 3.2

With Beryl enabled:

End of calculation. Time= 28.388 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.185 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.573( 1.013) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 23:41:00 PST 2006


With Beryl turned off - standard Gnome:

End of calculation. Time= 27.743 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.170 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.913( 0.971) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 23:48:07 PST 2006

flapane
December 1st, 2006, 05:59 PM
It´s hard to believe but I shaved just under two seconds off my time by disabling CPU frequency scaling.:D


------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 14:21:01 UT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.520 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.616 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.504 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 33.354 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.502( 5.008) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 14:21:35 UT 2006


also in windows by disabling c&q on amd64;)

flapane
December 1st, 2006, 06:00 PM
Pentium 4 @ 3.36GHz - Gigabyte GA-8IPE1000-G - 1GB RAM
Running SabayonLinux 3.2

With Beryl enabled:

End of calculation. Time= 28.388 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.185 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.573( 1.013) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 23:41:00 PST 2006


With Beryl turned off - standard Gnome:

End of calculation. Time= 27.743 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.170 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.913( 0.971) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 23:48:07 PST 2006


[ot]
how do you feel using our italian sabayon? I was thinking testing it, when I've spare time

Erich K
December 1st, 2006, 06:27 PM
AMD Athlon XP 2000+ ( Overclocked to 1.8 )

384mb RAM



------ Started super_pi run : Fri Dec 1 10:23:25 MST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.548 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.976 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.944 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.960 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.944 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.960 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.900 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.956 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.988 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.928 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.944 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.960 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.928 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.004 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.932 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.968 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.888 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.784 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.668 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 58.352 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.220 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 58.572( 1.952) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Dec 1 10:24:36 MST 2006

mcduck
December 1st, 2006, 06:42 PM
http://www.elisanet.fi/pontus.schonberg/content/images/pi_small.jpg (http://www.elisanet.fi/pontus.schonberg/content/images/pi.jpg)

Core Duo T2300 (1,66 GHz) 1GB RAM, Edgy & Beryl. Pretty nice for a laptop ;)

drphilngood
December 1st, 2006, 07:35 PM
...Core Duo T2300 (1,66 GHz) 1GB RAM, Edgy & Beryl. Pretty nice for a laptop ;)

Your laptop beats my DT.
BTW, I really like your wallpaper and would love a link to it.

mcduck
December 1st, 2006, 08:03 PM
Your laptop beats my DT.
BTW, I really like your wallpaper and would love a link to it.
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/13757904/

Guerdal82
December 1st, 2006, 08:16 PM
Ubuntu Edgy : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ 1804.237 MHz MemTotal: 1035680 kB

------ Started super_pi run : vendredi 1 décembre 2006, 20:12:55 (UTC+0100)
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.764 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.704 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.784 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.792 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.816 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.792 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.824 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.820 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.816 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.784 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.752 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.756 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.668 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.472 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 54.799 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.212 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 55.011( 1.772) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : vendredi 1 décembre 2006, 20:13:54 (UTC+0100)

drphilngood
December 1st, 2006, 08:30 PM
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/13757904/

Thank you, mcduck!

futz
December 1st, 2006, 10:36 PM
[ot]
how do you feel using our italian sabayon? I was thinking testing it, when I've spare time
I like it. Guess I wasn't getting enough confusion anymore from Ubuntu/Fedora, so now I get my quota and then some from SabayonLinux Gentoo. :mrgreen:

If I'm confused that means I'm learning new things, so that's good.

jdong
December 2nd, 2006, 03:41 AM
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.974( 0.828) Sec.

Core Duo T2300

angkor
December 3rd, 2006, 07:48 PM
Total calculation(I/O) time= 33.334( 0.796) Sec.

Amd64 x2 3800+ @ 2.2Ghz

Btw Superpi is only using one core, is that normal?

jdong
December 3rd, 2006, 07:59 PM
Yes, SuperPI is a single-threaded benchmark. It also tends to produce dramatically better results on the Intel Pentium M and Intel Core architectures than on AMD's competing products, even if in other benchmarks the two processors score similarly.

Christmas
December 3rd, 2006, 08:41 PM
Here's mine (My CPU is a P4 2800 MHz Prescott, no HT):

chris7mas@floyd:~/dld$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Dec 3 21:38:52 EET 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.500 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.744 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.752 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.748 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.768 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.772 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.808 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.764 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.748 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.736 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.656 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.380 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.502 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.200 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.702( 0.940) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Dec 3 21:39:29 EET 2006
However the program is not GPL. In the Readme.txt it says:

Attention : All of the above mentioned files are not permitted for the re-distribution.

shining
December 3rd, 2006, 10:37 PM
However the program is not GPL. In the Readme.txt it says:

So does anyone know about any alternatives?

angkor
December 3rd, 2006, 11:16 PM
Yes, SuperPI is a single-threaded benchmark. It also tends to produce dramatically better results on the Intel Pentium M and Intel Core architectures than on AMD's competing products, even if in other benchmarks the two processors score similarly.

Thanx for the info.

louistan3
December 3rd, 2006, 11:46 PM
intel centrino core duo 2ghz
1gb DDR2
sony laptop


louistan3@vaiosz:~/super_pi$ ./super_pi
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Dec 4 11:34:58 NZDT 2006
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.325 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.057 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.234 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.221 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.223 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.219 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.221 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.219 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.223 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.215 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.213 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.206 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.190 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.155 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.083 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.060 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.131 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.191( 0.705) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Dec 4 11:35:29 NZDT 2006
louistan3@vaiosz:~/super_pi$


i thnk mine looks pretty good for a laptop.. :D

jdong
December 4th, 2006, 12:51 AM
intel centrino core duo 2ghz
1gb DDR2
sony laptop


i thnk mine looks pretty good for a laptop.. :D

Ahem, you have one of the fastest laptop processors available and also not too far off from the fastest consumer PC processor period ;-)

Old Pink
December 4th, 2006, 12:57 AM
matt@matt-desktop:~/su$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Dec 3 23:54:25 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.964 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.108 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.560 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.580 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.584 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.584 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.576 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.580 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.576 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.576 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.572 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.592 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.560 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.576 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.540 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.560 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.536 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.520 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.416 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.184 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 70.584 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.296 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 70.880( 1.792) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Dec 3 23:55:37 GMT 2006SLOW!

dbbolton
December 4th, 2006, 01:02 AM
hmm, my desktop did about the same as my notebook :/

RJARRRPCGP
December 10th, 2006, 08:13 PM
Here's mine under Kubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake

With the following specs:

Asus A7N8X-X with BIOS 1010 (8/4/2004)

Athlon XP Barton 3000+ AQZFA OC'ed to 2.392 Ghz (184x13.0)

512 MB of Kingston PC2700 DDR SDRAM with Infineon chips at 184 mhz with 2.5-3-3-7

rjarrrpcgp@RJARRRPCGP-KING:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Dec 9 14:10:00 EST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.536 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.769 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.033 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.038 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.051 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.034 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.031 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.044 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.031 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.033 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.037 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.033 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.023 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.006 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.966 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.828 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.262 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.173 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 40.435( 1.280) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Dec 9 14:10:41 EST 2006
rjarrrpcgp@RJARRRPCGP-KING:~/Desktop$

PatrickMay16
December 10th, 2006, 11:00 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Dec 10 20:40:45 GMT 2006
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Dec 10 20:41:23 GMT 2006
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.532 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.660 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.904 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.916 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.904 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.928 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.904 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.904 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.920 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.892 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.872 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.812 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.690 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.196 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.886( 1.236) Sec.


Athlon 64 3000+, 1839.019 MHz.

ReiKn
December 11th, 2006, 01:12 AM
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.404 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.428 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.268 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 28.330 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.494( 0.892) Sec.


Pentium D @ 3,2GHz

Hairy_Palms
December 11th, 2006, 01:18 AM
damn my computer is one bad *** speed freak *cough*
athlonXP2200 512mbram

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Dec 11 00:16:02 GMT 2006
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.900 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.860 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.400 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.432 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.648 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.444 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.440 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.424 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.240 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.424 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.528 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.544 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.412 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.408 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.424 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.408 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.396 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.360 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.300 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.092 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 67.820 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.248 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 68.068( 2.340) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Dec 11 00:17:32 GMT 2006

scxtt
December 11th, 2006, 01:53 AM
:> cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 2073724 kB
MemFree: 1192652 kB


:> cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 3601.655
cache size : 1024 KB
bogomips : 7207.86


:> ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Dec 10 19:46:00 EST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.408 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.588 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.596 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.592 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.620 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.632 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.588 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.612 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.536 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.600 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.480 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.494 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.152 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.646( 0.972) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Dec 10 19:46:32 EST 2006

shado
December 12th, 2006, 12:09 AM
asus a8js laptop:
intel core 2 duo 7200
ddr 2048MB 667mhz
nvidia 7700go

beryl 0.1.3 running


------ Started super_pi run : lun dic 11 23:41:31 CET 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.364 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.856 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.008 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.968 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.960 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.948 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.912 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.852 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 19.305 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.120 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 19.425( 0.760) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : lun dic 11 23:41:51 CET 2006


Wow, I bought my new laptop today. I didn't imagine that processing power...

GarethMB
December 12th, 2006, 12:18 AM
1.3ghz celeron
1 gig of ram
intel 852 graphics
with X and programs running

61.012 s

mcduck
December 12th, 2006, 12:20 AM
Wow, I bought my new laptop today. I didn't imagine that processing power...
Oh, you haven't even got a clue yet. ;)

Try running 2 SuperPi's at the same time, and you should still get about the same result. Now isn't that cool? :cool:

jdong
December 12th, 2006, 12:36 AM
Wow, I bought my new laptop today. I didn't imagine that processing power...

The Intel Core chips are some of the most powerful CPU's you can get.. and for the power they give you they are actually quite a bargain. Even the budget "Core Solo" puts some year-old expensive Opteron workstations to shame.

JayTee
December 12th, 2006, 03:02 AM
Pentium D 940 3.2GHZ 2GB DDR2 533mhz RAM running Dapper 6.06, Nvidia 6200 LE w/128MB DDR2 vid ram. Running Beryl 0.1.1
This test was run with Xchat open and connected, Firefox open with 3 tabs and Amarok running a 25 song playlist.

------ Started super_pi run : Mon Dec 11 20:57:32 EST 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.500 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.332 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.212 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.690 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.854( 0.784) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Dec 11 20:58:01 EST 2006

JayTee
December 12th, 2006, 03:15 AM
For reference, my CPU is a Core 2 Duo E6600 running at the standard 2.4GHz.
If it makes any difference, I have 2GB RAM also.


****$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:16 GMT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.316 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.880 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.780 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.756 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 16.229 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 16.333( 0.636) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 00:22:33 GMT 2006

Woo! I think that beats out everyone who's posted so far, and I know my processor's by no means the fastest in existence.

I think "fastest" now is a relative term. The new Core 2 Duo architecture is a vast improvement over both the Pentium 4, Pentium D and Athlon architectures as most of the current benchmarks will show. A 2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo will usually outperform a Pentium D 940 3.2ghz CPU like mine. The difference is that Core no longer uses Netburst and both cores can share the same cache memory without going through the Front Side Bus. The Front Side Bus speed is also 1066mhz which is much faster than the Pentium D clas s of cpu. Intel has really outdone themselves with the Core 2 series. I'm eagerly waiting to see what AMD comes up with next to top them as they have tended to be a tad more innovative than Intel in the past several years. Ain't competition a great thing?

jdong
December 12th, 2006, 03:20 AM
Woo! I think that beats out everyone who's posted so far, and I know my processor's by no means the fastest in existence.


Dude, your processor is basically in the top-5 list for fastest consumer-market desktop processors ;-) Stop being so humble!

ciscosurfer
December 12th, 2006, 06:27 AM
Pentium 4 @ 3GHz, Ubuntu Edgy 6.10
1.5 GB DDR2 Dual Channel 400 MHz SDRAM
Intel BTX 915G (South Lake 2) 800 MHz Motherboard [D915GSE2]

http://aycu12.webshots.com/image/8571/2001188314351530627_rs.jpg

Azriphale
December 12th, 2006, 02:29 PM
I think "fastest" now is a relative term. The new Core 2 Duo architecture is a vast improvement over both the Pentium 4, Pentium D and Athlon architectures as most of the current benchmarks will show. A 2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo will usually outperform a Pentium D 940 3.2ghz CPU like mine. The difference is that Core no longer uses Netburst and both cores can share the same cache memory without going through the Front Side Bus. The Front Side Bus speed is also 1066mhz which is much faster than the Pentium D clas s of cpu. Intel has really outdone themselves with the Core 2 series. I'm eagerly waiting to see what AMD comes up with next to top them as they have tended to be a tad more innovative than Intel in the past several years. Ain't competition a great thing?

Well, Intel is coming out now with the Core 2 Quad, which tops the Duo by about 40%. A year before AMD's quad cores. This is going to be interesting to watch, I agree.

My results:
Pentium M 1.86


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.436 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.404 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.632 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.628 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.628 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.620 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.596 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.464 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 32.246 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.200 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 32.446( 0.876) Sec.

mips
December 12th, 2006, 03:13 PM
AMD64 3200+, Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9, 1GB, Kubuntu Dapper


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.548 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.108 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.020 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.012 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.812 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.163 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 40.343( 1.304) Sec.


Celeron M 1.5GHz, HP nx6110, 512MB, Debian Sid (sidux (http://sidux.com/))

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.668 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.128 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.476 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.488 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.496 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.500 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.480 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.444 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.420 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.356 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.228 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 48.875 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.264 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 49.139( 0.996) Sec.

futz
January 5th, 2007, 01:47 AM
Hehehe! My newest machine. I'm just tickled to be running this fast. :mrgreen:
Core 2 Duo E6600 with a very slight overclock to 275 (2475MHz) clock speed (from stock 266 (2394MHz)). It will do MUCH more soon!

futz@xblade:~/download/SuperPI$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jan 4 16:39:25 PST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.236 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.684 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.788 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.788 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.788 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.780 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.776 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.760 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.736 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.680 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 15.477 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.108 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 15.585( 0.496) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jan 4 16:39:41 PST 2007

zanglang
January 5th, 2007, 07:11 AM
Darn, all these scores are making me look forward to upgrading my crummy little laptop cum server. :rolleyes:

End of calculation. Time= 104.059 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.468 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 104.527( 2.720) Sec.

macogw
January 5th, 2007, 07:44 AM
Mom's desktop--Celeron D
Well, my mom and sister are logged on in the background, but oh well...

With Beryl:


End of calculation. Time= 42.795 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.212 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 43.007( 1.164) Sec.


Without Beryl


End of calculation. Time= 41.823 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.200 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 42.023( 1.200) Sec.


Without X


End of calculation. Time= 39.482 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 39.666( 1.056) Sec.


My laptop -- Core Duo
With Beryl


End of calculation. Time= 29.618 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.168 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.786( 0.776) Sec.


Gnome


End of calculation. Time= 29.190 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.354( 0.828) Sec.


Fluxbox


End of calculation. Time= 28.766 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.930( 0.8736) Sec.


WindowMaker


End of calculation. Time= 28.758 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.922( 0.756) Sec.


Without X


End of calculation. Time= 29.014 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.186( 0.772) Sec.


Looks like DE makes little difference...though I wonder how Fluxbox and WindowMaker ran faster than no-X..think I'll retry that no-X

2nd try without X


End of calculation. Time= 28.962 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.160 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.122( 0.724) Sec.

Fluxbox and WindowMaker are still faster than not having X at all...WEIRD

I don't know how to overclock. How does this work?

Gargamella
January 5th, 2007, 11:26 AM
This is Intel Celeron M

------ Started super_pi run : ven gen 5 11:25:22 CET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.636 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.072 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.412 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.420 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.460 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.420 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.464 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.408 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.424 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.416 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.432 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.444 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.412 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.424 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.420 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.424 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.348 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.192 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 48.075 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.256 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 48.331( 1.272) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : ven gen 5 11:26:15 CET 2007

Tutu 1234
January 5th, 2007, 12:36 PM
2.4ghz P4 256 meg of ram
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.204 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.528 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.512 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.532 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.528 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.520 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.520 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.524 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.516 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.528 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.516 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.524 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.528 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.532 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.524 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.508 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.480 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.396 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.240 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 49.851 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.224 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 50.075( 1.324) Sec.

Just realized HT is off as standard with it turned on

I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.164 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.540 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.480 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.484 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.496 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.504 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.500 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.508 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.500 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.512 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.500 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.508 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.460 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.228 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 49.363 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.228 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 49.591( 1.140) Sec.

Tachyon_
January 5th, 2007, 01:47 PM
UBUNTU 6.10without X:

25.764 (26.926 with X)

WINDOWS XP home without explorer&others:

32.776 (36 with E+apps.)
(cant remember last digits.)

That's with my Core Duo 1,8Gzh+1Gb DDR2 laptop. Windows had almost fresh install with no apps.

The most fun part was when me and my friends were having lan-party at out garace and decided to take superpi competition. My friends non-clocked P 3.4 with HT resulted something like 46 seconds, almost same as my other friends 1.4Ghz celeron laptop. Guess windows really gets performance down after years of normal usage.

M_the_C
January 5th, 2007, 02:02 PM
AMD Athlon XP2800+, 512MB RAM.

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.660 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.168 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.464 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.500 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.488 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.476 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.480 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.504 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.476 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.492 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.476 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.488 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.472 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.440 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.392 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.216 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 49.123 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 49.307( 1.792) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 13:00:26 GMT 2007

jdong
January 5th, 2007, 04:08 PM
Fluxbox and WindowMaker are still faster than not having X at all...WEIRD

I don't know how to overclock. How does this work?
Probably pure coincidence. Run it in single-user recovery mode and that should attain the fastest possible results :)

Don't overclock if you don't know how. That's a pretty good sign not to attempt it. In reality, it's nowadays a BIOS option on BIOS'es that support overclocking. Unless you know what you're doing, you can g et yourself into some serious trouble, like hangs, infinite reboot loops, and inability to make it back into the BIOS (all at least requiring resetting the CMOS) so be careful :)

kurgan78
January 5th, 2007, 04:17 PM
My new Dell Latitude D620 (Centrino Duo 2.16GHz CPU), running Edgy Live off of a USB thumb drive


------ Started super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 10:04:45 UTC 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.340 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.964 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.128 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.116 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.108 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.096 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.064 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.996 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 22.173 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.124 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 22.297( 1.000) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 10:05:11 UTC 2007


And my desktop at work running Edgy in VMWare Workstation 5.5.3 on a Dell Optiplex GX280 (Pentium D 3.8GHz)


------ Started super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 10:05:59 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.472 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.428 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.460 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.404 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.344 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.228 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.646 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.826( 2.328) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 10:06:28 EST 2007


I didn't expect it to be that fast in VMWare! :eek:

macogw
January 5th, 2007, 06:09 PM
Probably pure coincidence. Run it in single-user recovery mode and that should attain the fastest possible results :)

Don't overclock if you don't know how. That's a pretty good sign not to attempt it. In reality, it's nowadays a BIOS option on BIOS'es that support overclocking. Unless you know what you're doing, you can g et yourself into some serious trouble, like hangs, infinite reboot loops, and inability to make it back into the BIOS (all at least requiring resetting the CMOS) so be careful :)
Yeah, I found out what I did wrong. ctrl alt f1 doesn't kill X, just makes it not visible. Should've typed sudo /etc/init.d/gdm stop ....so I'll try that later and fix my post accordingly

paridoth
January 6th, 2007, 12:44 AM
winchester core 3000+ AMD64 socket 939 2GB of ram nforce4SLI gigabyte mobo

with X 41.879

without X 40.915

going to get a sandiego core amd64 4000+ in a few days, cant wait to see the diference

finer recliner
January 6th, 2007, 12:55 AM
------ Started super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 15:48:58 PST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.944 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.808 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.864 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.820 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.848 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.844 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.832 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.872 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.864 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.828 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.856 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.892 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.860 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.820 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.764 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.672 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 36.982 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.252 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.234( 0.868) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 5 15:49:39 PST 2007
davef@davef-laptop:~/Desktop/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES$ cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1034532 kB
MemFree: 619732 kB
(...)
davef@davef-laptop:~/Desktop/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz
stepping : 8
cpu MHz : 1596.180
cache size : 2048 KB

mips
January 6th, 2007, 01:35 PM
:rolleyes:

xyz
January 6th, 2007, 02:12 PM
Good Lord...is this normal?

th@luser:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 14:05:24 CET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 2.688 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 9.105 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 11.037 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 10.241 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 9.949 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 10.121 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 10.005 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 10.113 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 10.049 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 9.729 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 10.177 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 10.141 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 10.133 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 10.141 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 10.137 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 10.081 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 10.077 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 9.969 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 9.729 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 9.021 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 200.817 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.476 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 201.293( 4.232) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 14:09:08 CET 2007
th@luser:~/Desktop$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.70GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 2693.610
cache size : 128 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr
bogomips : 222.27

paridoth
January 7th, 2007, 02:50 AM
Good Lord...is this normal?

ow i dont think so, i think there are weaker celerons that got better scores then that, try running it without X maybe some app is eating your cpu

BuffaloX
January 7th, 2007, 03:25 AM
I knew my OC would come in handy. :p

Athlon 64 Native 2.0 Ghz OCed to 2.5 Ghz



------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jan 7 03:08:17 CET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.384 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.200 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.312 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.220 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.254 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.402( 0.564) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 7 03:08:45 CET 2007


Just opened a terminal and ran it, firefox and some other minor programs still running.

Jbloudg20
January 7th, 2007, 03:45 AM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 21:43:04 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.392 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.116 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.300 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.296 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.296 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.296 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.260 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.140 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 25.498 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.144 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 25.642( 0.760) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 21:43:30 EST 2007

chrisfay
January 7th, 2007, 04:32 AM
cat /proc/cpuinfo

model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 2793.087
cache size : 1024 KB



Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 20:24:14 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.440 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.512 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.352 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 30.478 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.658( 0.708) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 20:24:44 MST 2007

old Compaq server:


cat /proc/cpuinfo

model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 930.445
cache size : 256 KB


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -M noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 20:10:00 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.590 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 4.960 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 5.710 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 5.710 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 5.710 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 5.690 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 5.700 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 5.670 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 5.660 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 5.600 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 5.450 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 5.030 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 112.570 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.470 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 113.040( 3.420) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 20:11:53 MST 2007

OldTimeTech
January 7th, 2007, 05:55 AM
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 733.191


------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 6 23:50:18 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 2.372 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 7.360 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 8.457 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 8.513 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 8.433 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 8.445 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 8.509 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 8.453 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 8.445 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 8.501 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 8.449 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 8.409 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 8.469 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 8.505 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 8.441 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 8.381 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 8.429 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 8.281 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 7.985 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 7.480 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 166.962 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.800 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 167.762 (4.284 sec.)

Not bad for an old computer....:rolleyes:

chrisfay
January 7th, 2007, 10:25 AM
Not bad for an old computer....:rolleyes:

My coppermine's bigger than yours!! :mrgreen:

lazyd2
January 7th, 2007, 10:33 AM
Core 2 Duo 6600

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jan 7 11:31:19 EET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.312 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.948 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.928 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.940 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.936 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.952 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.952 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.940 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.936 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.944 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.940 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.936 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.928 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.828 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 18.553 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 18.657( 2.928) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 7 11:31:38 EET 2007

sk0tcom
January 15th, 2007, 04:25 AM
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.20GHz


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jan 14 22:21:26 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.380 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.200 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.336 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.200 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.002 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.166( 0.768) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 14 22:21:53 EST 2007

rabid9797
January 15th, 2007, 04:31 AM
old CPU is ollldddddd :(

Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz (4 years old)

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jan 14 22:28:29 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.860 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.296 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.312 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.324 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.324 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.328 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.344 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.320 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.324 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.316 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.324 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.316 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.308 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.308 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.308 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.280 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.248 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.148 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.944 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 65.452 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.400 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 65.852( 1.700) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 14 22:29:43 EST 2007

STREETURCHINE
January 15th, 2007, 05:02 AM
intel pentium 4 ,3.00 ghz proccessor,1 gig of ram.


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Jan 15 11:59:22 WST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.440 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.484 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.736 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.736 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.712 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.640 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.540 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.022 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.208 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.230( 1.192) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Jan 15 11:59:56 WST 2007
rex@rex-desktop:~$

Tiede
January 15th, 2007, 05:17 AM
Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+ w/ 1.8Ghz and 512Mb RAM.


tiede@myacer3000laptop:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : dimanche 14 janvier 2007, 23:11:47 (UTC-0500)
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.180 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.088 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.396 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.392 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.392 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.408 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.396 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.396 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.376 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.344 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.264 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.088 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 47.711 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.192 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 47.903( 1.184) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : dimanche 14 janvier 2007, 23:12:36 (UTC-0500)

jason_yes_jason
January 19th, 2007, 08:22 PM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Fri Jan 19 13:20:56 CST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.320 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.004 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.148 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.140 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.112 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.036 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 22.781 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.128 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 22.909( 0.656) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Jan 19 13:21:19 CST 2007
jason@jason-desktop:~/superpi$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz

wesley_of_course
January 20th, 2007, 08:09 PM
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing.

keithpeter
January 20th, 2007, 09:27 PM
Recycled IBM Netvista. I'm a mere 50% behind the fastest ones :lolflag:


model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.20GHz
stepping : 4
cpu MHz : 2193.166
cache size : 512 KB



------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 20 20:23:41 GMT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.076 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.244 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.780 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.764 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.780 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.772 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.760 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.788 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.792 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.764 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.784 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.756 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.768 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.784 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.772 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.728 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.740 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.720 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.604 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.360 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 74.473 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.420 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 74.893( 2.128) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 20 20:25:00 GMT 2007

Onyros
January 25th, 2007, 07:32 PM
My Thinkpad T23 (Pentium III-M 1.0GHz, 512MB RAM PC 133) :D


------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jan 25 18:28:22 WET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.388 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 4.412 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 5.080 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 5.080 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 5.088 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 5.080 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 5.084 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 5.072 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 5.080 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 5.076 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 5.064 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 5.044 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 5.000 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 4.896 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 4.580 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 100.478 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.436 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 100.914( 2.580) Sec.

truthfatal
January 25th, 2007, 11:45 PM
Yup.... There be some numbers here.



model name : AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2600+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 1648.224
cache size : 128 KB




Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jan 25 15:36:23 MST 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.668 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.108 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.308 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.244 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.388 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.416 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.324 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.320 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.428 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.280 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.248 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.412 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.404 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.300 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.280 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.364 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.400 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.040 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 46.355 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.264 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 46.619( 1.192) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jan 25 15:37:43 MST 2007

mips
January 26th, 2007, 07:20 PM
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing.


./super_pi 20

http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=320577&postcount=1

wesley_of_course
February 4th, 2007, 08:34 AM
Wesley here ;

cat /proc/cpuinfo

model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.60GHz


Started super_pi run : Sat Feb 3 21:26:31 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.988 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 4.580 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 4.584 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 4.604 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 4.600 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 4.588 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 4.608 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 4.608 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 4.600 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 4.600 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 4.604 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 4.588 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 4.588 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 4.632 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 4.580 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 4.544 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 4.488 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 4.356 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 4.032 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 90.666 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.600 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 91.266( 2.308) Sec.

:(

EdThaSlayer
February 4th, 2007, 09:30 AM
Seems my P4 3.0 GHZ[HT support] with 686 kernel is working pretty nicely. :)
Add that to the 1GB of DDR2 ram I have.


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 4 11:26:17 EAT 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? ^X^XInterrupt
edwin@edwin-desktop:~/MyDownloads/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 4 11:26:47 EAT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.456 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.412 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.588 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.588 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.596 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.628 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.596 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.576 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.564 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.600 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.404 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.222 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.192 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.414( 0.844) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Feb 4 11:27:19 EAT 2007

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 12:25 AM
loke@x04d:cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 3360.075
cache size : 2048 KB

------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:35:13 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.184 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.608 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.680 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.660 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.616 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 13.725 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.072 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 13.797( 0.480) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:35:41 EST 2007
This is with "Stress" already running, as well as Firefox, MPD/NCMPC, Beryl and gaim running.

Choad
February 8th, 2007, 12:29 AM
richard@richard-laptop:~$ '/home/richard/Desktop/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES/pi'
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:28:13 GMT 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.340 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.912 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.052 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.092 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.024 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.072 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.040 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.076 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.016 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.004 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.024 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.008 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.004 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.012 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.008 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.952 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.896 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 20.373 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.124 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 20.497( 0.660) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:29:03 GMT 2007
richard@richard-laptop:~$


i had a few other apps running including music playing, and i am running beryl... so maybe it would have gone a bit faster if those had been off :)

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 12:34 AM
Bah, I forgot to mention I also had music, gaim, firefox and Beryl running. =]

Choad
February 8th, 2007, 12:37 AM
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:36:11 GMT 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.356 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.984 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.956 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.856 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 19.449 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.124 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 19.573( 0.660) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:36:33 GMT 2007
richard@richard-laptop:~$


quite a bit faster without :D

m.musashi
February 8th, 2007, 02:42 AM
Little disappointed here. I would have thought my athlon x2 would out perform a pentium D. This was like a $1000 processor not that long ago (although I only paid $240). Anyway, here's the info

939 Athlon 64 X2 4800 2.4Ghz stock
1 GB RAM
Ubuntu Edgy

Without beryl (gnome)

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:31:58 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.888 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.468 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.424 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.416 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.408 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.272 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 28.802 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.950( 0.880) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:32:27 MST 2007
With beryl

End of calculation. Time= 29.018 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.144 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.162( 0.720) Sec.
And here is my Core Duo 2Ghz lappy

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:08:24 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.352 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.060 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.192 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.084 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.142 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.132 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.274( 1.160) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:08:49 MST 2007
@ ~Loke: Am I reading your post right? Is that 6300 overclocked to 3.36Ghz? That's like double stock. Is it hard to keep cool or are the core 2 really that efficient?

Choad
February 8th, 2007, 03:50 AM
And here is my Core Duo 2Ghz lappy

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:08:24 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.352 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.060 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.192 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.084 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.142 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.132 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.274( 1.160) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 18:08:49 MST 2007
@ ~Loke: Am I reading your post right? Is that 6300 overclocked to 3.36Ghz? That's like double stock. Is it hard to keep cool or are the core 2 really that efficient?
whats the factor that makes my core 2 duo faster than yours? its the 2 ghz model, same as urs

i would have thought they'd perform the same.... but theres 4 seconds in it. im not trying to gloat btw, i am genuinely interested

Mega_slayer
February 8th, 2007, 04:28 AM
Wow you guys are pretty fast...

AMD something... 2.0 GHz
512 RAM
ATI RADEON 9800 (may be a 9700)


------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:23:55 AST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.936 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.052 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.464 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.464 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.492 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.492 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.472 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.492 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.492 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.468 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.468 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.496 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.492 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.468 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.476 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.476 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.440 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.424 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.360 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.148 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 68.872 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.252 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 69.124( 2.488) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 7 23:25:05 AST 2007

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 04:51 AM
@ ~Loke: Am I reading your post right? Is that 6300 overclocked to 3.36Ghz? That's like double stock. Is it hard to keep cool or are the core 2 really that efficient?
Yeah, my E6300 is OC'd to 3.36. 480x7. My computer is water cooled, and the load temps are still in the mid/high 50's. I'm stress testing as we speak and it's not liking my OC too much. Had to pump up the voltage to get Orthos to stop failing me. We'll see how it goes.

Eventually I'd like to get it to to 500FSB (3.5GHz), but that's not too realistic right now.

EDIT: And yeah, that's a 90% overclock.

m.musashi
February 8th, 2007, 04:55 AM
whats the factor that makes my core 2 duo faster than yours? its the 2 ghz model, same as urs

i would have thought they'd perform the same.... but theres 4 seconds in it. im not trying to gloat btw, i am genuinely interested

I'm not sure but I have the core duo and you the core 2 duo. One difference is the larger L2 cache. I think the core 2 has 4 mb and the core just 2 mb. I'm not sure if that has much impact on this test or not though. There could be configuration issues too. I have a pretty stock edgy install with no attempt made at speeding anything up. Mine is a dell and I suppose there could be issues with the mobo used too but I'm not sure. Maybe dell uses cheap parts - wouldn't suprise me.

However, you would think they would be similar so maybe it's just the L2 bit.


Yeah, my E6300 is OC'd to 3.36. 480x7. My computer is water cooled, and the load temps are still in the mid/high 50's. I'm stress testing as we speak and it's not liking my OC too much. Had to pump up the voltage to get Orthos to stop failing me. We'll see how it goes.

Eventually I'd like to get it to to 500FSB (3.5GHz), but that's not too realistic right now.

EDIT: And yeah, that's a 90% overclock.
Damn! I don't know much about overclocking but Damn. However, other than smoking all of us on the speed test, does that overclock buy you anything day to day? I suppose if you are a serious gamer it would but for me my cpu sits at 1-2% just about all the time. I can't imagine an overclock would help me at all. In fact, the 4800 I have is pretty much going to waste. I can rip and burn a DVD in about 20 minutes or so but other than that I am not tapping the power that I have. I did just start folding@home though so maybe I'm giving a bit back to the world now.

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 04:56 AM
The core 2 duo is superior to the Core Duo.

DrainBead
February 8th, 2007, 05:08 AM
I'm thinking of writing a virus with a benchmark, posting it here and oh well, you'll all download it and run it.

Did ANY of you check the source before you ran it? I did and found out why it's constantly crashing on my system.

DrainBead
February 8th, 2007, 05:10 AM
The core 2 duo is superior to the Core Duo.

It is?

And just another question, since you seem to have your PM's turned off, have you ever been at Anandtech?

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 05:26 AM
It is?

And just another question, since you seem to have your PM's turned off, have you ever been at Anandtech?

Yes, I was a member of those forums under the alias "LoKe". I was banned for "cracking" into the moderator account and "committing acts of awesomeness".

And yeah, overclocking on a high-end system is nearly useless for the average person, but I fold often and it yields some benefits.

EDIT: Out of curiosity...you're not "DainBramaged" are you?

m.musashi
February 8th, 2007, 05:30 AM
Yes, I was a member of those forums under the alias "LoKe". I was banned for "cracking" into the moderator account and "committing acts of awesomeness".
Don't suppose you want to elaborate on that :).

~LoKe
February 8th, 2007, 05:31 AM
Don't suppose you want to elaborate on that :).

http://pics.bbzzdd.com/toplist.php

Image ranked #11. Some of that content is slightly NSFW.

DrainBead
February 8th, 2007, 05:35 AM
Yes, I was a member of those forums under the alias "LoKe". I was banned for "cracking" into the moderator account and "committing acts of awesomeness".

And yeah, overclocking on a high-end system is nearly useless for the average person, but I fold often and it yields some benefits.

EDIT: Out of curiosity...you're not "DainBramaged" are you?

On AT i used to be Klixxer, maybe before your time but me and n0c reigned in OS and OT during night time for a while.

I had some misfortune in my life and left for a long time and now i don't even remember my PW or what e-mail i used, doesn't matter.

I did follow that ordeal though, felt like oldtime GenMay fun. heh.

Overclocking on a high end system is only useless if there is something other than that restricting you from reaching maximum potential in something, there is a balance to be had but right now, overclocking a core2duo would not be a bad idea if you can raise bus speeds.

Other than that, yeah, except for number crunching, any overclock besides a bus speed overclock is mostly for show.

m.musashi
February 8th, 2007, 05:41 AM
I hope I don't get in trouble for saying that's pretty cool. I wish I knew even half that much. Btw, I take it the deleted names were user (mods?) accounts?

wesley_of_course
February 16th, 2007, 05:48 AM
Wesley here ;

cat /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz

------ Started super_pi run : Thu Feb 15 23:39:55 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.232 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.792 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.784 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.772 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.748 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.692 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 15.697 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 15.801( 0.520) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Feb 15 23:40:10 EST 2007

Fresh install Edgy :shock:

Thank You all for the continued support !

prince_niceguy
February 18th, 2007, 09:18 PM
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5500 @ 1.66GHz

------ Started super_pi run : Mon Feb 19 01:42:35 IST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.432 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.184 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.368 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.248 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.172 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 26.266 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.156 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 26.422( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Feb 19 01:43:01 IST 2007

spockrock
February 18th, 2007, 09:23 PM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 18 15:23:01 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.388 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.216 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.332 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.244 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.498 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.140 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.638( 0.960) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Feb 18 15:23:29 EST 2007

AMD X2 3800+ @2.6GHz, not bad for an A64 :p

hoctro
February 20th, 2007, 02:50 PM
IBM T60, duo core T2400 1.83Hz, RAM: 1.5GB, ATI 512 MB X1400....
Ubuntu 6.10

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Feb 20 14:46:48 CET 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.392 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.412 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.384 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.372 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.200 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 27.190 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.338( 0.952) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Feb 20 14:47:15 CET 2007

flyingbrass
February 20th, 2007, 04:28 PM
I see it's almost time for a new system.

2.4 Celeron @ 2.8 512MB

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.816 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.996 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.024 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.004 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.016 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.024 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.992 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.996 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.000 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.028 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.012 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.996 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.000 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.996 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.008 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.996 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.932 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.856 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.620 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 59.376 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.204 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 59.580( 1.796) Sec.

slibuntu
February 20th, 2007, 05:48 PM
Heres mine, Pentium M 1.7GHz, on Edgy with Beryl, 1Gig of RAM
HERE (http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=396594574&size=o)

J33pG33k
February 21st, 2007, 05:28 AM
Hey everyone! I've been using Ubuntu since Warty (and Debian 2.0 before that), and have long since been poking around the forums. Thought I would make my first post and pop the cherry by sharing my super_pi 1M run with you. Just got this new machine around Christmas time and am really liking it.

Specs are:
M/B: Asus P5W-DH Deluxe, rev. 1.04g
Proc: Core 2 Duo E6600 (Week 28, B stepping, fsb @ 400 Mhz x 9 multi.)
Memory: 2GB Corsair Dominator 6400C4, DDR2-800
Gpu: XFX 7900GS (at 600/720)


cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 3604.038
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 7216.34
clflush size : 64

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 3604.038
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 7207.74
clflush size : 64


./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Feb 20 23:12:44 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.135 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.420 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.485 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.487 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.484 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.484 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.486 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.485 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.485 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.483 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.486 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.480 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.483 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.489 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.481 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.477 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.475 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.469 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.455 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.426 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 9.526 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.054 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 9.580( 0.351) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Feb 20 23:12:59 EST 2007


This run was done with Beryl, Firefox, and Matlab open (one core was completely taken crunching away at a project). Total memory usage was at ~350 Mb.

I have also followed a couple threads for Windows SuperPi 1M postings, and have found that Linux SuperPi times for the same system can be significantly lower than for SuperPi on Windows. Anybody know why that may be? Some forum threads won't let users post Linux times because they claim an unfair advantage. I say its more than fair and just feel bad for them because they are using Windows :biggrin:

Kingsley
February 21st, 2007, 06:07 AM
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+@2400.000 MHz



------ Started super_pi run : Wed Feb 21 00:02:45 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.672 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.612 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.516 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.624 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.616 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.612 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.612 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.588 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.620 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.512 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.572 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.460 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.722 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.160 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.882( 0.836) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Feb 21 00:03:20 EST 2007

phido
February 21st, 2007, 08:34 AM
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz, 1GB RAM


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.480 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.912 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.676 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.700 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.708 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.744 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.596 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.484 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 33.958 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.106( 0.844) Sec.

webjames
February 25th, 2007, 11:33 PM
Time: 27.994

Pentium 4 3.4 HT
512
no graphics card.

here is the screen shot:

26144

regards,

James

bward1
February 26th, 2007, 02:28 AM
My system has an intel core 2 duo E6600 with 2gb ram. Here is what my system got while running amarok beryl firefox gnome etc. also

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 25 20:19:53 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.252 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.684 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.676 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.676 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.668 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.676 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.664 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.664 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.652 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.636 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.588 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 13.357 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.072 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 13.429( 1.972) Sec.

Furthermore, when I ran two of them simultaneously, the scores were about 15 or 16 seconds for each of them. Ohh the power of dual core.

Another interesting thing to point out is that while running in wine (I downloaded the .exe) I recorded a score of 23 seconds, significantly slower than the 13 I got before. A slow down was expected though as it was running in an emulator.

I continued my experimenting by running it on my brother's machine of similar specs but running windows instead of linux. His system has the latest nvidia northbridge wheras mine has the intel ich8 and his system has 800 ram while mine only has 667. His system took 30 seconds, which is slower than both linux and linux with wine. I personally found these results to be pretty amazing.

ahaslam
March 2nd, 2007, 09:30 PM
bward1 how much of an oc are you running?

My E6300 @ 2562MHz (FSB+100) with 1G of DDR2-5400 @ 732MHz and timings of 4-4-4-12 takes a while longer:


ahaslam[super_pi]$ ./pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Fri Mar 2 20:23:34 GMT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.233 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.756 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.878 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.875 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.878 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.877 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.878 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.877 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.878 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.875 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.877 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.876 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.876 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.876 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.874 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.873 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.866 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.856 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.828 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.777 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.261 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.095 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.356( 0.619) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Mar 2 20:23:52 GMT 2007

bward1
March 4th, 2007, 06:28 AM
I'm not overclocking at all. I'm guessing that the difference between our performance is due to the differing L2 cache sizes. While granted your processor is running a little faster than mine is, mine has twice the L2 cache, so that may make up the difference. I'm not entirely sure how the L2 cache works, but I know that bigger is better, and that is the only thing I can think of that would cause the differing performance.

PatrickMay16
March 4th, 2007, 07:07 AM
OH MAN!!!! Recently I got a processor upgrade.



patrick@ubuntu:~/Desktop/super_pi.tar.gz_FILES$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Mar 4 06:04:32 GMT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.416 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.336 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.540 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.532 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.532 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.536 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.536 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.520 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.512 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.464 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.360 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 30.270 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.418( 0.724) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Mar 4 06:05:02 GMT 2007


This is information on the new processor I have.


processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 47
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3800+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2452.013
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni
bogomips : 4910.09

Toet
April 16th, 2007, 03:42 PM
My current pc, XP3200+ 1,5GB mem, with X (feisty). Getting a new board (with X2 3800) in a few days, I'm looking forward to see what that will do.


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.572 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.872 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.144 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.144 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.148 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.140 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.152 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.136 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.160 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.140 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.156 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.120 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.136 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.940 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 42.511 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 42.695( 1.304) Sec.


Now with my X2 3800 (32bit):


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.824 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.720 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.636 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.528 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.798 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.978( 0.960) Sec.


X2 3800 64 bit Feisty:


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.668 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.500 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.712 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.712 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.736 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.740 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.744 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.732 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.728 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.696 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.540 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.350 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.530( 0.764) Sec.

WiFi Ed
April 17th, 2007, 05:44 AM
And mine...


------ Started super_pi run : Mon Apr 16 21:39:53 PDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.284 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.040 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.036 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.040 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.036 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.036 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.028 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.028 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.024 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.024 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.016 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.000 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.912 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 20.325 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.120 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 20.445( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Apr 16 21:40:14 PDT 2007

BOBSONATOR
April 17th, 2007, 06:17 AM
My Laptop Centrino 1.8 Dothan, pretty good eh?


./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of"-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Apr 16 22:13:43 PDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.456 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.848 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.832 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.848 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.844 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.836 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.832 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.840 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.816 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.796 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.652 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 36.206 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.216 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 36.422( 1.044) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Apr 16 22:14:23 PDT 2007



I got 35.005 w/o X.

WiFi Ed
April 17th, 2007, 06:35 AM
"My Laptop Centrino 1.8 Dothan, pretty good eh?"

Not too shabby:D . Your numbers compare well with some of the faster CPU's in the thread!

I hoped for a little better from mine, but I'm not complaining:o

makinasvp
April 17th, 2007, 06:37 AM
As soon as I go home from work, I will test my AMD FX-60 Dual Core processor. I'm excited hehe

markupstart
April 17th, 2007, 07:11 AM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 1998120
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1
noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Apr 17 01:08:05 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.252 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.892 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.880 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.868 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.840 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.792 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.597 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.096 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.693( 0.508) Sec.


Info On CPU

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 1596.000
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni mo
nitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 3736.05
clflush size : 64

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 1596.000
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni mo
nitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 3733.31
clflush size : 64

makinasvp
April 17th, 2007, 03:35 PM
Here are my results...
Are they any good?

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d123/siasalami/results.png

m.musashi
April 18th, 2007, 12:40 AM
Here are my results...
Are they any good?

Good is kind of subjective but those are not bad numbers. The fastest I've seen here is about 13-14 seconds for over-clocked core 2s. Some are well into 1 minute + so yours are definitely in the top half or better. I can't remember but my 4800 X2 was in the 24 sec range and I'm pretty happy with my set up.

EDIT: oops, 29 secs.

Rhapsody
April 18th, 2007, 01:11 AM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 18 01:06:25 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.712 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.256 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.596 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.592 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.584 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.584 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.592 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.584 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.584 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.588 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.572 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.572 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.536 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.468 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.288 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 51.111 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.228 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 51.339( 1.404) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 18 01:07:18 BST 2007

AMD Sempron 2800+ (early version, does not support SSE3 or AMD64)

mrazster
April 18th, 2007, 01:13 AM
Heres my Opteron 170@2700mhz ,mems 270mhz 2,5-3-3-8 1T ....and I have some apps running. Will do another run next time I reboot...think it'll shave of a second or so.


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.340 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.072 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.232 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.212 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.200 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.092 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.222 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.136 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.358( 0.776) Sec

Compucore
April 18th, 2007, 03:13 AM
Here is mine I know it is slow compared to some of the newer ones here that are running faster processors. I just ran it on my Dell GX150 PIII 1.0 GHZ with 256 megs of ram

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Apr 17 22:07:42 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.776 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 5.596 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 6.584 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 6.376 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 6.292 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 6.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 6.404 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 6.488 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 6.224 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 6.792 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 6.176 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 6.672 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 6.436 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 6.604 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 6.524 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 6.488 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 6.456 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 6.108 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 5.832 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 5.828 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 127.824 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.484 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 128.308( 4.088) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Apr 17 22:10:21 EDT 2007

I'll try it on my laptop over here soo to see if there is a difference and on a dual procesoor server with two PII 800 and 1.5 gigs of ram.

Here are the results from my laptop which gets better. RUnning a Piv 1.6 ghz and 256 megs of ram.

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Apr 17 22:35:39 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.216 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.332 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.792 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.788 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 3.752 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.748 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.928 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.912 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.476 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.780 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.804 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.752 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.752 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.776 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.728 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.724 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.728 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.688 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.552 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.308 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 74.517 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.336 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 74.853( 1.796) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Apr 17 22:37:01 EDT 2007

Onyros
April 25th, 2007, 01:54 PM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -
noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 13:48:21 WEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.744 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.408 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.792 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.776 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.760 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.692 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.572 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 55.455 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.280 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 55.735( 1.440) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 13:49:17 WEST 2007

My Thinkpad X31 (Pentium M 1.4GHz 1MB L2 cache, 768MB RAM)

I have my Toshiba's result (Pentium M 760 2.0GHz, 2MB L2 cache) somewhere around here, too.

End of calculation. Time= 31.186 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.188 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.374( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 11:37:26 WET 2006

That was back in November, I suppose I can get a better result now.

samjh
April 25th, 2007, 02:11 PM
Intel Core2 Duo 6300 processor
Intel P965 chipset
2 Gigabytes of DDR2 800Mhz RAM


------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 23:07:14 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.356 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.304 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.152 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.304 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.304 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.148 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.148 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.140 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.128 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.088 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.020 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 23.909 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.136 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.046( 0.952) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 23:07:38 EST 2007

Iceni
April 25th, 2007, 02:16 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 15:11:11 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.484 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.520 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.764 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.768 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.768 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.788 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.760 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.752 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.768 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.772 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.740 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.740 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.724 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.692 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.556 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 34.846 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.156 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 35.002( 1.088) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 15:11:48 CEST 2007


AMD A64 3000+@2.35Ghz

MaximPL
April 25th, 2007, 04:44 PM
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz





Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.320 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.012 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.160 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.168 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.160 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.160 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.164 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.160 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.156 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.148 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.132 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.096 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.036 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 22.921 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.144 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 23.065( 0.752) Sec.

Onyros
April 28th, 2007, 10:29 PM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -
noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 13:48:21 WEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.744 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.408 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.812 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.804 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.808 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.792 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.776 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.760 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.692 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.572 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 55.455 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.280 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 55.735( 1.440) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 25 13:49:17 WEST 2007

My Thinkpad X31 (Pentium M 1.4GHz 1MB L2 cache, 768MB RAM)

I have my Toshiba's result (Pentium M 760 2.0GHz, 2MB L2 cache) somewhere around here, too.

End of calculation. Time= 31.186 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.188 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.374( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Nov 30 11:37:26 WET 2006

That was back in November, I suppose I can get a better result now.Damn, my Thinkpad X31's result was with Debian Etch... I managed to shave 3 seconds out of it with Ubuntu Feisty. I say it's strange, because that result was with Debian Etch and the i686 kernel, and Ubuntu's result was with a generic kernel image.


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -
noframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 22:25:14 WEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.720 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.268 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.648 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.644 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.652 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.636 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.656 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.648 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.632 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.652 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.628 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.644 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.616 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.596 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.532 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.404 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 52.207 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.280 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 52.487( 1.240) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 22:26:07 WEST 2007

Puppy fam
April 28th, 2007, 10:47 PM
Core 2 Duo (E6600) @ 2.4 GHz


------ Started super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 17:40:14 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.204 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.604 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.708 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.680 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.652 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.612 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 13.773 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.088 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 13.861( 0.464) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 17:40:31 EDT 2007

wconstantine
May 10th, 2007, 09:19 PM
Core 2 Duo (E6600) @ 2.4 GHz


------ Started super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 17:40:14 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.204 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.604 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.708 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.680 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.652 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.612 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 13.773 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.088 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 13.861( 0.464) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Apr 28 17:40:31 EDT 2007


Nice. When I ran my E6600 at 3GHz I got 12.125s. You must be running a quite tweaked ubuntu or something? I laugh at the overclocking team that just broke the 9s limit of calculating 1M with superpi! They used a Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 running at 5620 MHz and they got 8,985s. In Linux that record would have been around 4seconds better or more.

I ran superpi in Vista 1M and got 16s at 3GHz, in Linux 12,125s. Although I only tried it once, it seems to vary up and down in Linux. :p

Balazs_noob
May 10th, 2007, 10:02 PM
Amd64 3000+ / k8n51 Gigabyte / 1gb


------ Started super_pi run : Thu May 10 22:55:17 GMT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.820 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.080 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.368 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.344 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.352 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.376 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.364 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.368 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.360 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.324 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.272 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.132 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 47.051 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.200 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 47.251( 1.296) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu May 10 22:56:06 GMT 2007

JeyKey
May 16th, 2007, 03:12 PM
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.5GHz:

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed May 16 16:11:16 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.172 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.496 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.568 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.560 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.560 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.552 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.548 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.524 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.492 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 11.109 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.076 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 11.185( 0.464) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed May 16 16:11:27 CEST 2007

canceLinux
May 17th, 2007, 10:03 AM
First computer Celeron 2.4
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 5.096 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 5.728 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 5.840 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 5.732 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 5.828 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 5.688 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 5.664 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 5.688 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 5.708 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 5.540 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 5.412 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 5.400 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 5.500 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 5.452 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 5.436 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 5.444 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 5.452 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 5.160 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 4.872 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 110.615 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.252 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 110.867( 1.844) Sec.


And the real bomb :lolflag:

Celeron mendocino 400 Mhz

here, the screenshot:
http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/1372/mendocinogp2.png

yes beryl running on that :S

maybe i should buy a new computer ;)

bierbo
May 17th, 2007, 11:16 PM
woooho, ubuntu feisty with beryl!
maybe i should give him some tweaking - but my lenovo 3000 n100 is running fine and WITH sound, unusual for this series. i think i won't tweak it unless my beryl gets slow.


http://blog.wordy-rappinghood.net/uploads/Image/super-pi.png

Mr.Clark
May 19th, 2007, 03:19 PM
Surely some mistake, it's less than half the time of my Windows run:

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/148/superpihn3.png

Specs here (http://www.themongoose.co.uk/specs/)

screaminj3sus
May 19th, 2007, 04:25 PM
Weird, took alot less time then on windows
http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/3532/screenshotvk5.png (http://imageshack.us)

stmiller
May 19th, 2007, 04:48 PM
This executable is not multithreaded and only runs on one cpu!

madmetal
May 25th, 2007, 06:23 PM
AMD 3200+ (2.2Ghz 512k) 1.5Gb ram ubuntu feisty fawn 32bit.


------ Started super_pi run : Fri May 25 20:21:31 EEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.984 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.920 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.992 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.992 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.852 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.972 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.952 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.908 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.784 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 39.786 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.168 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 39.954( 1.288) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Fri May 25 20:22:11 EEST 2007

Digitallysick
May 27th, 2007, 01:24 AM
pentium 3.4ghz prescott 650 @ 4.2 GHZ swiftech watercooled , not bad for a non dualcore proc

------ Started super_pi run : Sat May 26 19:22:35 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.304 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.000 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.128 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.128 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.332 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.304 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.376 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.252 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.176 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 25.174 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.192 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 25.366( 0.780) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat May 26 19:23:00 CDT 2007

pistooli
May 29th, 2007, 07:35 PM
Intel Core2Duo 2.4 GHz

------ Started super_pi run : Tue May 29 20:34:18 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.308 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.860 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.092 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.032 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.848 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.072 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.844 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.844 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.752 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.293 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.100 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.393( 0.572) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue May 29 20:34:36 CEST 2007

alxjl
May 29th, 2007, 07:48 PM
Intel Centrino Core Solo T1350@1.86Ghz


------ Started super_pi run : Wed May 30 02:43:34 PHT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.368 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.176 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.356 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.364 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.352 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.220 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 26.838 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 26.986( 0.816) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed May 30 02:44:02 PHT 2007

l1oyd
June 9th, 2007, 03:44 AM
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jun 9 12:27:54 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.600 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.928 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.188 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.220 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.200 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.240 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.180 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.188 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.180 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.220 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.204 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.236 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.236 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.124 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.980 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.188 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.192 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.936 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 43.247 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 43.419( 1.528) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jun 9 12:28:42 EST 2007

Just did my first ever overclock and dropped my time from ~53.8 down to this time of ~43.5 Lets hope the heatsink does its job.

ASUS A7N8X-Deluxe
AMD2100+ running @ 2700+ (sorry I can't remember the actual freq)
2 x 256MB Geil
1 x that 256MB stick I found under the couch...
ATI Radeon 9600 128MB

mips
June 12th, 2007, 11:32 PM
AMD64 3200+, Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9, 1GB, Kubuntu Dapper


Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.548 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.052 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.108 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.036 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.020 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.012 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.988 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.936 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.812 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.163 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 40.343( 1.304) Sec.

With Sabayon it shaves more than 2 seconds off the time,


------ Started super_pi run : Wed Jun 13 00:26:48 UTC 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.523 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.675 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.918 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.914 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.923 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.914 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.917 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.925 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.917 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.919 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.920 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.914 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.920 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.916 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.913 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.910 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.900 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.883 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.837 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.716 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 37.893 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.175 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 38.068( 1.091) Sec.

x0as
June 17th, 2007, 10:14 PM
Intel Celeron 346 3.06Ghz, 512mb ram.


------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jun 17 22:06:59 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.592 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.804 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.068 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.076 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.088 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.068 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.084 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.076 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.108 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.060 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.076 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.072 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.088 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.080 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.048 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.080 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.056 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.956 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.808 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 40.987 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 41.159( 1.380) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jun 17 22:07:40 BST 2007

ijustam
June 17th, 2007, 10:49 PM
Intel Core 2 Duo 1.86ghz, 1gb ram


------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jun 17 17:47:52 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.284 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.928 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.060 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.128 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.080 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.132 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.104 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.108 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.120 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.104 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.108 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.132 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.124 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.044 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.104 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.096 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.044 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.024 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.068 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.984 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 21.637 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.116 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 21.753( 0.648) Sec.

avik
June 17th, 2007, 11:02 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jun 17 15:01:28 PDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.752 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.468 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.756 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.688 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.684 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.680 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.672 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.760 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.772 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.716 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.644 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.504 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 33.966 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.160 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 34.126( 0.848) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jun 17 15:02:03 PDT 2007

petru.patrascu
June 24th, 2007, 08:21 PM
LAPTOP ACER Turion 2 GHZ, 1GB RAM 533 MHZ !!!:)

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jun 24 21:15:59 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.944 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.560 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.788 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.784 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.780 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.776 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.764 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.744 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.704 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.588 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 35.654 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 35.834( 0.940) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jun 24 21:16:35 CEST 2007

Techn101
June 24th, 2007, 09:07 PM
On my laptop with a Core 2 Duo T2500

./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : zo jun 24 22:08:57 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.372 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.464 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.568 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.412 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.468 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.504 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.536 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.460 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.396 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.452 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.348 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.380 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 28.874 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.132 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.006( 1.024) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : zo jun 24 22:09:34 CEST 2007

OneSeventeen
July 11th, 2007, 08:12 PM
I can't seem to get the file downloaded from there... does anyone have a copy of the super_pi.tar.gz file elsewhere?

Trueno22
July 12th, 2007, 04:22 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 11:21:17 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.196 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.560 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.648 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.636 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.636 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.632 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.620 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.600 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.552 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 12.649 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.084 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 12.733( 0.468) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 11:21:30 EDT 2007

Atomic Dog
July 12th, 2007, 05:07 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 09:04:55 MST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.352 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.064 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.232 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.224 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.236 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.232 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.240 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.240 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.240 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.240 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.236 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.240 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.232 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.228 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.200 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.172 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.088 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 24.422 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.140 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 24.562( 1.012) Sec.


The only thing is it seems only one core is being used on my C2D T5600 laptop

~LoKe
July 12th, 2007, 05:19 PM
loke@x04d:cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 3360.075
cache size : 2048 KB

------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 11:35:13 EST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.184 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.608 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.692 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.700 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.688 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.696 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.680 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.660 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.616 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 13.725 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.072 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 13.797( 0.480) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 11:35:41 EST 2007
While stress testing.

cookieforyou
July 12th, 2007, 06:51 PM
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 36.130 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 36.314( 0.884) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 19:48:09 SAST 2007


Celeron D 2.8 GHz, 1GB RAM


$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2813.786
cache size : 256 KB

crimesaucer
July 13th, 2007, 03:05 AM
CPU info:



blah@blah-blah:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.60GHz
stepping : 8
cpu MHz : 1596.538
cache size : 1024 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe nx
bogomips : 3196.27
clflush size : 64


Super Pi:




blah@blah-blah:~$ cd ~/super_pi
blah@blah-blah:~/super_pi$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 22:02:38 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.632 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.064 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.376 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.392 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.400 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.372 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.416 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.408 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.384 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.364 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.380 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.360 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.340 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.280 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.144 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 47.099 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.240 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 47.339( 1.084) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Jul 12 22:03:26 EDT 2007
blah@blah-blah:~/super_pi$

TheeMahn2003
July 22nd, 2007, 09:13 PM
AMD X2 4600 Asus A8N-SLI 32 Deluxe (only uses 1 CPU for some reason and jamming to music and browsing the net as it ran ;)


------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 16:09:13 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.740 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.300 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.484 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.476 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.460 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.420 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.324 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 29.778 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.144 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.922( 0.740) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 16:09:43 EDT 2007

Anyone know if there is a switch to enable usage of second cpu?

mrazster
July 22nd, 2007, 09:55 PM
Got beryl and a couple of other apps running...but pretty good run anyway...

Hardware:
Asus P5N-E SLI
Intel QX6700
2x2gb A-Data PC2 5300



------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 22:49:08 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.196 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.573 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.655 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.653 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.653 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.652 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.653 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.654 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.646 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.645 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.641 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.630 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.608 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.565 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 12.842 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.082 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 12.924( 0.539) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 22:49:21 CEST 2007

lepz
July 22nd, 2007, 11:20 PM
AMD 64x2 4200


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 23:07:40 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.444 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.392 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.592 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.608 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.604 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.568 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.584 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.548 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.508 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.400 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.390 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.562( 0.820) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jul 22 23:08:11 BST 2007

RamonBianco
August 4th, 2007, 07:11 PM
Core 2 Duo e4300 @2.7 GHz [8*338]
sudo lshw
*-cpu
description: CPU
product: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz
vendor: Intel Corp.
physical id: 4
bus info: cpu@0
version: 6.15.2
serial: 0000-06F2-0000-0000-0000-0000
slot: Socket 775
size: 2704MHz
capacity: 4GHz
width: 64 bits
clock: 338MHz



Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 4 13:56:18 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.236 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.780 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.912 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.856 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.816 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.865 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.088 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.953( 0.764) Sec.

Milk & Toast & Honey
August 4th, 2007, 08:15 PM
Pentium M 1.6Ghz with 2GB RAM, running Feisty:

End of calculation. Time= 38.770 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.248 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 39.018( 0.896) Sec.

Pentium D 3.4Ghz (Dual) with 2GB RAM, running openSuSE 10.2:

End of calculation. Time= 25.126 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.160 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 25.286( 0.784) Sec.

bob_c_b
August 5th, 2007, 04:16 AM
I forgot all about this thread, my first post was way back on page 4. Anyway, running FC7 right now, but here are my current results...


[bob@tortuga super_pi_lnx]$ sh super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 4 23:08:15 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.283 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.812 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.933 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.925 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.926 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.928 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.932 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.925 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.932 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.931 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.922 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.926 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.931 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.925 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.915 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.899 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.865 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.808 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 18.273 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.116 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 18.389( 0.883) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 4 23:08:33 EDT 2007


C2D e6420@stock

My first run was with a barely OCd Celeron D and came in at over double the time, thank you Moore's Law (which I know someone will remind me has nothing to do with CPU speed but actually transistor count and isn't really a law but an observation, forgive me).

mr.propre
August 21st, 2007, 12:03 PM
IBM (lenovo) Thinkpad R60 Intel Core 2 T5600 @ 1.83GHz

Picture (http://image.codeforpron.com/PI.png)


webshit@Lappie-II:~$ sh super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 09:29:33 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.372 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.080 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.260 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.248 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.244 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.192 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.128 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 25.010 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.136 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 25.146( 0.976) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 09:29:58 CEST 2007

xyz
August 21st, 2007, 12:26 PM
Seems awful slow to me.
Toshiba Satellite A40 IntelCeleron 2.7Ghz 512 RAM

What could I do about it? Thnx.

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 13:20:52 CEST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.932 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 6.284 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 7.252 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 7.368 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 7.088 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 7.100 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 7.080 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 7.148 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 7.168 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 6.936 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 7.168 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 7.224 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 7.252 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 7.188 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 6.944 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 7.148 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 7.100 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 7.028 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 6.944 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 6.368 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 141.525 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.492 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 142.017( 3.444) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 13:23:32 CEST 2007

Arwen
August 21st, 2007, 01:10 PM
My P4 @3GHz with 1GB RAM is really not sth to be proud of:
I had firefox,amsn and vlc working..
End of calculation. Time= 37.766 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.196 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.962( 1.244) Sec.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of calculation. Time= 37.766 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.196 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.962( 1.244) Sec.
with all 3 apps and update manager downloading.

kuja
August 21st, 2007, 07:21 PM
My new Inspiron 1420N Laptop (processor is a T7300):

blackwaltz@dell:~$ super_pi
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 14:16:36 EDT 2007
Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.280 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.820 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.928 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.924 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.916 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.912 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.916 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.912 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.920 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.908 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.884 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.804 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 18.121 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.116 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 18.237( 0.980) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 14:16:57 EDT 2007

RideP2
August 21st, 2007, 07:48 PM
My ~4 year old P4 1.7Ghz box with 768MB of ram.

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 4.268 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 4.604 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 4.916 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 4.848 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 4.856 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 4.808 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 4.832 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 4.836 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 4.852 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 4.864 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 4.852 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 4.852 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 4.872 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 4.844 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 4.832 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 4.796 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 4.728 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 4.580 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 4.228 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 95.454 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.668 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 96.122( 2.136) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 14:46:19 EDT 2007

Warren Watts
August 21st, 2007, 08:22 PM
450MHz PIII 384MB RAM:

------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 14:55:15 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 3.196 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 9.809 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 11.233 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 11.233 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 11.201 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 11.161 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 11.177 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 11.173 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 11.157 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 11.213 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 11.197 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 11.177 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 11.277 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 11.349 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 11.305 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 11.321 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 11.241 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 11.061 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 10.721 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 9.909 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 221.962 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 1.152 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 223.114( 7.476) Sec.

Woo Hoo!

tdrusk
August 21st, 2007, 08:53 PM
------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 15:51:17 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.408 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.520 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.516 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.552 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.544 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.532 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.520 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.528 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.532 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.556 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.524 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.516 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.464 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.352 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 30.186 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.144 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.330( 0.840) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 15:51:49 EDT 2007

Good? Bad?

fhco
August 22nd, 2007, 12:51 AM
Toshiba U200-ST2091, Core 2 T7300



------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 18:47:54 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.372 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.948 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.884 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 19.693 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.132 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 19.825( 0.940) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 18:48:13 CDT 2007

kuja
August 22nd, 2007, 01:19 AM
Toshiba U200-ST2091, Core 2 T7300



------ Started super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 18:47:54 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.372 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.992 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.996 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.948 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.884 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 19.693 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.132 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 19.825( 0.940) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Tue Aug 21 18:48:13 CDT 2007

That's interesting/odd. I wonder why even though we have the same processor that mine did it in 1.6 seconds less. Did you do it with dynamic scaling still on or something like that?

Jeff_From_VA
August 22nd, 2007, 08:42 AM
Just built this box tonight, still not finished with it....
c2d e8650 @3.0ghz
1gb ddr2 8500
gigibyte mobo
pair of raptors (not yet working in raid 0, thanks to absolute crap raid support in ubuntu)

Haven't started over clocking, or optimizing ubuntu yet

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.224 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.564 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.648 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.652 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.648 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.644 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.640 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.636 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.636 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.556 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.560 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.536 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 12.561 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.084 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 12.645( 0.432) Sec.

WiFi Ed
August 24th, 2007, 05:44 AM
Here's mine after upgrading my cpu to a 2.4 GHz Core2Quad Q6600


Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu Aug 23 21:38:59 PDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.244 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.704 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.812 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.812 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.808 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.796 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.804 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.788 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.776 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.756 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.700 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 15.841 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.104 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 15.945( 0.716) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu Aug 23 21:39:15 PDT 2007

Previous was about 20 seconds with a 2.13GHz Core2Duo...

grndslm
September 3rd, 2007, 06:35 PM
I, too, have a quad-core Q6600 w/2GB & Gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R mATX board.

I used the autoclocking feature of the board and it says it's at 3.47GHz, but it's prolly a bit under that. Anyway, here are my results... FAST!

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 12:32:51 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.200 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.512 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.672 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.580 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.588 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.580 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.580 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.660 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.568 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.544 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.508 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 11.705 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.072 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 11.777( 0.452) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 12:33:03 CDT 2007
Would running the 64-bit OS show much improvement over this speed?? Wondering if 64-bit Linux is worth the hassle (i.e. - compiling 32-bit apps, flash, java, etc.)

christhemonkey
September 3rd, 2007, 06:43 PM
Mine looks very slow after that one!

Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 18:41:24 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.732 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.320 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.660 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.660 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.672 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.660 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.676 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.660 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.664 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.652 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.652 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.668 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.660 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.680 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.640 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.636 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.628 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.616 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.536 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.320 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 52.523 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 52.703( 1.928) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 18:42:21 BST 2007


This is with a AMD Athlonx XP 2600+ 2.1Ghz

Ultra Magnus
September 3rd, 2007, 07:44 PM
james@HAL-9000:~/tarballs$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 19:41:53 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.332 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.864 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.980 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.968 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.008 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.988 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.976 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.972 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.964 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.968 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.940 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.916 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.848 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 19.297 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.124 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 19.421( 0.792) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 19:42:12 BST 2007

This is with 2.0 Ghz Core 2 Duo (Centrino)

Kingsley
September 3rd, 2007, 08:07 PM
king@dv6000t:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 15:01:07 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.436 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.112 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.336 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.312 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.344 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.332 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.340 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.252 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.160 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 26.222 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 26.370( 1.308) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 15:01:34 EDT 2007

PatrickMay16
September 3rd, 2007, 08:49 PM
king@dv6000t:~/Desktop$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 15:01:07 EDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.436 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.112 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.380 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.336 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.312 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.308 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.344 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.320 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.324 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.328 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.332 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.340 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.252 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.160 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 26.222 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 26.370( 1.308) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 15:01:34 EDT 2007


I'm quoting you now. Heh heh heh heh.
Alright LISTEN UP. What CPU do you have?
Oh man yeeeeeaaaahhhhhh BENIS DENIS.


And, since I last posted in this thread, I upgraded my processor yet again. Now I have a dual core opteron which I overclocked a bit.




------ Started super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 20:47:43 BST 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.388 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.252 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.440 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.436 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.432 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.428 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.408 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.388 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.292 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 28.466 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.140 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 28.606( 1.044) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Sep 3 20:48:12 BST 2007


It normally runs at 2200MHz... but my main man Deven Gallo gave me some tips and pointers, and I now have it running at about 2500MHz.
It usually hits temperatures of about 51 to 53 degrees celcius with both cores at full load.

grndslm
September 3rd, 2007, 09:56 PM
Mine looks very slow after that one!
...

Total calculation(I/O) time= 52.703( 1.928) Sec.
...

This is with a AMD Athlonx XP 2600+ 2.1GhzYes, it does look very slow doesn't it? =^p

This single-threaded app shows that even just one core from a C2D or quad-core chip are super efficient!! One 3.4GHz does the work in about 4.5 times as fast as this Athlon. Could you imagine apps like these being multi-threaded?!?!? \/\/0\/\/!

I'm really not pickin', I'm just sayin'... this thing is fast!

grndslm
September 3rd, 2007, 10:00 PM
It normally runs at 2200MHz... but my main man Deven Gallo gave me some tips and pointers, and I now have it running at about 2500MHz.
It usually hits temperatures of about 51 to 53 degrees celcius with both cores at full load.Wow... my heatsink gets to about 37C on idle & almost 40C at full load during the day time. I'm sure any individual core prolly gets up to 10C higher than the heatsink, but that's impressive.

Q6600 w/ G0 stepping & Zalman CNPS7700, FTW!!

PatrickMay16
September 3rd, 2007, 10:29 PM
Wow... my heatsink gets to about 37C on idle & almost 40C at full load during the day time. I'm sure any individual core prolly gets up to 10C higher than the heatsink, but that's impressive.

Sorry for the confusion here. But what is impressive? Your heatsink temperature, or my CPU core temperature which I mentioned?

At the same time, I was looking keenly at a zalman heatsink. But they're very large, and I'm worried that it wouldn't fit in my case or break stuff due to the heavy weight. Did that cause a problem for you when installing it?

Kingsley
September 4th, 2007, 03:16 PM
I'm quoting you now. Heh heh heh heh.
Alright LISTEN UP. What CPU do you have?
Oh man yeeeeeaaaahhhhhh BENIS DENIS.

Oh yeah, I should have put that in.
-Intel Core 2 Duo 1.73 GHz

pinguino13
September 5th, 2007, 09:23 AM
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 1Gig RAM

edgar@Antec:~/Desktop/super$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Sep 5 03:17:46 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.976 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.360 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.288 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.280 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.292 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.284 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.276 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.272 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.268 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.248 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.220 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.152 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 26.170 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.128 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 26.298( 0.716) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Sep 5 03:18:13 CDT 2007

lamborghiniwang
September 5th, 2007, 07:07 PM
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Sep 5 13:06:39 CDT 2007
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.320 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.800 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.916 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.904 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.900 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.896 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.888 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.872 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.844 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.784 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 17.813 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.116 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.929( 1.084) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Sep 5 13:06:57 CDT 2007


Intel Core 2 Duo T7400.

qazwsx
September 5th, 2007, 07:22 PM
./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with ver
sion 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Mi
nline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -M
noreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : ke 5.9.2007 21:16:18 +0300
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 1.020 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 3.156 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 3.608 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 3.752 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 4.012 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 3.952 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 3.720 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 3.640 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 3.644 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 3.676 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 3.564 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 3.580 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 3.596 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 3.592 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 3.588 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 3.608 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 3.584 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 3.536 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 3.460 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 3.168 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 72.321 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.352 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 72.673( 2.036) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : ke 5.9.2007 21:17:32 +0300


:confused: Athlon X2 64 4200+ Kubuntu x86_64
wtf