DoctorMO
June 8th, 2007, 05:15 AM
So I writes this really nice post to fill in some sanity into a baddly written and spelled post. only to find that when I hit submit the post has gone.
OK so I accept that the thread was abusive so I won't quote any, but I'd not like to waste my time so I'll post my response.
I tried to get my Nokia 6060 to work in Linux but the phone caused fire and then exploaded. This doesn't work in this operating system. I notice that MacOSX has the Nokia Suite which although nokia won't port over to Linux I blame all of you for this small failure in my own abilities (added swearing)
Phones are poor quality in general, the features they offer are always very slim and the phone makers and network operators control what software you can run on them. put simply the mobile phone isn't ready for Linux yet. and the market needs to grow up some more.
I have far too many grievances to continue to use Linux any further, I shall be recommending any friends that I COULD make in the future not to use it; and I hope you all will be most sorry for prompting my anger by not pandering to my tastes.
Yes your right the best solution as you so concisely put, would be to implement a HAL driven connection to user service back ends which would tie into any specific client gui. and I do like your idea of holding all protocalls in a standard module format that can be reused for multiple phones coupled to your idea of phone id settings stored within HALs data structure so the user services don't mess up syncing and service settings when you plug in two or more phones at the same time or one after another. actually your ideas on passive ports for serial connected phones was most forward thinking even if most passive ports are not used for newer devices I think the kernel level modifications would be very valuable.
See instead of bitching I use the large thing between my ears to think of solutions. this isn't windows or Mac where you have to beg someone else for support. this is the real world mate; like it or hate it, your either proactive and productive member of the community or your an abusive leech. guess which one you are at the moment?
OK so I accept that the thread was abusive so I won't quote any, but I'd not like to waste my time so I'll post my response.
I tried to get my Nokia 6060 to work in Linux but the phone caused fire and then exploaded. This doesn't work in this operating system. I notice that MacOSX has the Nokia Suite which although nokia won't port over to Linux I blame all of you for this small failure in my own abilities (added swearing)
Phones are poor quality in general, the features they offer are always very slim and the phone makers and network operators control what software you can run on them. put simply the mobile phone isn't ready for Linux yet. and the market needs to grow up some more.
I have far too many grievances to continue to use Linux any further, I shall be recommending any friends that I COULD make in the future not to use it; and I hope you all will be most sorry for prompting my anger by not pandering to my tastes.
Yes your right the best solution as you so concisely put, would be to implement a HAL driven connection to user service back ends which would tie into any specific client gui. and I do like your idea of holding all protocalls in a standard module format that can be reused for multiple phones coupled to your idea of phone id settings stored within HALs data structure so the user services don't mess up syncing and service settings when you plug in two or more phones at the same time or one after another. actually your ideas on passive ports for serial connected phones was most forward thinking even if most passive ports are not used for newer devices I think the kernel level modifications would be very valuable.
See instead of bitching I use the large thing between my ears to think of solutions. this isn't windows or Mac where you have to beg someone else for support. this is the real world mate; like it or hate it, your either proactive and productive member of the community or your an abusive leech. guess which one you are at the moment?