View Full Version : Is ReGet fast or what? Anything else come close?
C-A
February 26th, 2007, 01:59 AM
I recently downloaded a file that took about 3 hours. My friend downloaded the same file using ReGet (in windows) and it took him about 45 minutes. We have the same isp so I would think that there should not be too big of a difference between our bandwidth in general.
I have tried KGet in Kubuntu but still did not see ReGet speeds.
Does ReGet make that big of a difference or I am missing something?
PriceChild
February 26th, 2007, 02:03 AM
I'm guessing he's closer to the exchange and so getting a better connection.
prizrak
February 26th, 2007, 02:54 AM
I think wget is pretty damn quick ;)
Mateo
February 26th, 2007, 03:01 AM
wget is really quick, too bad it's not a download manager though.
C-A
February 26th, 2007, 03:37 AM
I'm guessing he's closer to the exchange and so getting a better connection.
You are probably correct. I thought I was closer but my speed does not compare to his.
maniacmusician
February 26th, 2007, 05:05 AM
You are probably correct. I thought I was closer but my speed does not compare to his.
A good way to test it would be to use the same download manager. The default one in Firefox would work well, for instance.
BarfBag
February 26th, 2007, 05:11 AM
http://www.broadbandreports.com/
That site may have a speed tester. If not, it's a useful site.
C-A
February 27th, 2007, 12:12 AM
A good way to test it would be to use the same download manager. The default one in Firefox would work well, for instance.
I did some testing and it looks like it is a little of both- his connection is faster and reget is faster. We both downloaded a file with the firefox download manager and his connection was somewhat faster. He then downloaded the file with reget and his speed jumped up significantly.
NewOldTimer
February 27th, 2007, 12:52 AM
http://www.broadbandreports.com/
That site may have a speed tester. If not, it's a useful site.
yes it has speed test, this is one of my favorite sites that I brought over to ubuntu when I changed, this section of theirs is always good for something...http://www.dslreports.com/forum/deeplink
tbroderick
February 27th, 2007, 02:03 AM
wget is really quick, too bad it's not a download manager though.
You could use wget-queue (http://decafbad.net/projects/scripts/). Then wget will sort of act like a download manager. You just have to manually edit a simple file called todo.txt with any wget options and the address.
toxickiwi
March 6th, 2007, 10:38 AM
ReGet is fast because it downloads multiple streams over http at the same time.
I am also looking for something like ReGet or Freedownloadmanager for Ubuntu. Anyone?
toxickiwi
March 7th, 2007, 07:47 AM
Okay after looking around today I have found two, Axel & Prozilla
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/download-accelerator-for-linux-command-line-tools.html
http://prozilla.genesys.ro/
I have only used axel from command line to download http, it is faster than using wget but I still don't seem to get the same speed as reget on windows.
Also the http connection I am downloading from has passwords so I need to use it like this.
axel http://username:password@site.com/filename.tar.gz
I hope that helps a bit.
C-A
March 7th, 2007, 11:27 PM
Okay after looking around today I have found two, Axel & Prozilla
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/download-accelerator-for-linux-command-line-tools.html
http://prozilla.genesys.ro/
I have only used axel from command line to download http, it is faster than using wget but I still don't seem to get the same speed as reget on windows.
Also the http connection I am downloading from has passwords so I need to use it like this.
axel http://username:password@site.com/filename.tar.gz
I hope that helps a bit.
Nice, Thanks! Axel produced really good speeds when I tested it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.