v8YKxgHe
January 17th, 2007, 07:29 PM
Hey,
A friend of mine linked me to a forum topic about XSOS 0.3, (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=125713) an operating system that supports Dx10 and can run all Windows programs natively, they apparently did a deal with Microsoft and they helped implement Dx10, which I find hard to believe.
While this may be all good and well, I feel it could be violating the GPL License. There is a similar project, ReactOS (http://www.reactos.org/en/index.html), that aims to be a legal reversed engineered version of WinXP. ReactOS's current version is 0.3, the same as XSOS.
I find it hard to believe that what appears to be 1 person coding, has created an entire OS that can run Windows programs natively with DX10 support. What I think he has done is taken the ReactOS source-code, used that as a base and called it something else, which is all legal. But XSOS is closed-source, so this means if he did take ReactOS as a base and made it closed source that would be a GPL violation. I have posted in the topic and have tried to PM him about this but he will not reply, which makes me think he's trying to hide something :p
Is there anything we can do to make sure he's not using the GPL'ed code and then making it closed-source, which is violating the gpl license?
A friend of mine linked me to a forum topic about XSOS 0.3, (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=125713) an operating system that supports Dx10 and can run all Windows programs natively, they apparently did a deal with Microsoft and they helped implement Dx10, which I find hard to believe.
While this may be all good and well, I feel it could be violating the GPL License. There is a similar project, ReactOS (http://www.reactos.org/en/index.html), that aims to be a legal reversed engineered version of WinXP. ReactOS's current version is 0.3, the same as XSOS.
I find it hard to believe that what appears to be 1 person coding, has created an entire OS that can run Windows programs natively with DX10 support. What I think he has done is taken the ReactOS source-code, used that as a base and called it something else, which is all legal. But XSOS is closed-source, so this means if he did take ReactOS as a base and made it closed source that would be a GPL violation. I have posted in the topic and have tried to PM him about this but he will not reply, which makes me think he's trying to hide something :p
Is there anything we can do to make sure he's not using the GPL'ed code and then making it closed-source, which is violating the gpl license?