hizaguchi
November 16th, 2006, 08:28 PM
There's plenty of talk already about the Microsoft/Novell deal, and now the Microsoft/Red Hat no-deal floating around the interwebs. But I have a different interest in the situation. I'm just wondering exactly what patent issues have to do with me, directly, as an end user. I mean, as I understand it, a big part of these deals is that Microsoft won't sue Suse users for patent issues. But I'm not sure how much substance there really is to that in the first place. So I'd like to play out a little though experiment:
Let's assume, just for the purposes of this thread, that a significant portion of Gnu/Linux operating systems is in violation of patents owned by Microsoft. How does that affect an end user? Obviously there are indirect effects due to the possibility that the developers who write the code could potentially be sued for patent infringement, resulting in badness for everybody that benefits from their work. But could Microsoft actually sue end users for just running the code? Could that be turned into an RIAA style random lawsuit fest against kids and grandmas everywhere? Or is the whole idea of end users needing indemnification pure FUD?
Let's assume, just for the purposes of this thread, that a significant portion of Gnu/Linux operating systems is in violation of patents owned by Microsoft. How does that affect an end user? Obviously there are indirect effects due to the possibility that the developers who write the code could potentially be sued for patent infringement, resulting in badness for everybody that benefits from their work. But could Microsoft actually sue end users for just running the code? Could that be turned into an RIAA style random lawsuit fest against kids and grandmas everywhere? Or is the whole idea of end users needing indemnification pure FUD?