jdong
September 11th, 2006, 05:35 PM
Well, it looks like it's Microsoft's turn to have their QA department questioned....
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/09/11/1342224.shtml
Better check out those compressed files there!
So, bad QA affects even the biggest of companies. It's not just Ubuntu -- Microsoft does it too. And they've done it several times before, too.
EDIT: Looking at the timeline for this patch:
August 8, 2006: First release
August 24, 2006: Re-release of patch, first time it didn't correct all the vulnerabilities.
August 24, 2006: Reports surface in newsgroups of corruption, confirmed that it is caused by this update.
Sept 11, 2006: Slashdot coverage, no word from Microsoft yet.
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/09/11/1342224.shtml
Better check out those compressed files there!
So, bad QA affects even the biggest of companies. It's not just Ubuntu -- Microsoft does it too. And they've done it several times before, too.
EDIT: Looking at the timeline for this patch:
August 8, 2006: First release
August 24, 2006: Re-release of patch, first time it didn't correct all the vulnerabilities.
August 24, 2006: Reports surface in newsgroups of corruption, confirmed that it is caused by this update.
Sept 11, 2006: Slashdot coverage, no word from Microsoft yet.