New Years Resolution

[sffvba[e0rt]

3840 x 2160

[codingman]

1920x1080

Sorry...I'm still in the dark ages...

[bytr]

I'm also in the dark ages.
After all, 4K display is still expensive.

[sffvba[e0rt]

Oh I am still on full HD but would like to hit 4k this year perhaps... Or have some sort of VR headset :p

[DuckHook]

Okay. At the risk of unseemly flaunting...

Four identical 10-yr-old 1600x1200 monitors picked up from office equipment auction: $50 each/$200 total

GPU HIS Radeon HD 7950: $150 ebay

Cables & adapters: $50

Total resolution: 4800 x 1600
Total cost: $400

It's not 4K HD, but it's close. What's not close is the cost. Not close. At all.

Happy New Year.

[sffvba[e0rt]

Okay. At the risk of unseemly flaunting...

Four identical 10-yr-old 1600x1200 monitors picked up from office equipment auction: $50 each/$200 total

GPU HIS Radeon HD 7950: $150 ebay

Cables & adapters: $50

Total resolution: 4800 x 1600
Total cost: $400

It's not 4K HD, but it's close. What's not close is the cost. Not close. At all.

Happy New Year.

I like the way you think :D

[user1397]

1366x768 :(

[pfeiffep]

2 to 1
cars that is!

[DuckHook]

I like the way you think :DMy kids think I'm a cheapskate!:lolflag:

[nerdtron]

1440x900 home computer

[Mike_Walsh]

1920x1080

Sorry...I'm still in the dark ages...

YOU'RE still in the dark ages? Try 1024x768... :shock:


Regards,

Mike. :D

[QIII]

5760 x 1080

[Irihapeti]

YOU'RE still in the dark ages? Try 1024x768... :shock:


Well then, try 1024 x 600 :P

[codingman]

Okay. At the risk of unseemly flaunting...

Four identical 10-yr-old 1600x1200 monitors picked up from office equipment auction: $50 each/$200 total

GPU HIS Radeon HD 7950: $150 ebay

Cables & adapters: $50

Total resolution: 4800 x 1600
Total cost: $400

It's not 4K HD, but it's close. What's not close is the cost. Not close. At all.

Happy New Year.


Two can play at that game...

1920x1080 +
1600x900 +
1600x1200
=
5120x3180

Ha! Beat that 4K lovers!

[codingman]

5760 x 1080

3 1920x1080 monitors side by side? What's the aspect ratio on that?

[codingman]

o_O (http://4ktvblog.com/4k-tablet)

[Irihapeti]

All right then! Going in the other direction: 240 x 320 on an ancient smartphone. :D

[Mike_Walsh]

Well then, try 1024 x 600 :P

Goodness me, Irihapeti.....I didn't think there WAS anything smaller! :shock:

Regards,

Mike. ;)

[DuckHook]

Goodness me, Irihapeti.....I didn't think there WAS anything smaller! :shock:

Regards,

Mike. ;)Okay, I'll bite. I once tried to debug a script using a serial port attached to a scrolling LED display. Guestimated resolution: 48x10. In the snow. Uphill. Both ways. :tongue:

Only in the alternate reality of a Linux forum can a thread about monitor resolution turn into bragging rights about the smallest device ever used. :cool:

[Joeb454]

Currently for me it's 2560x1440 at home, and 7680x1080 at work. No idea what the resolution of my phone is though

[Yellow Pasque]

1920x1200, a strange resolution for a strange man.

EDIT: Well, I guess it's not that strange, but I haven't come across it in the screens I've seen.

[slickymaster]

Speaking about the dark ages: 1280x800 :icon_frown:

[user1397]

yay no one's made fun of my resolution yet! :D

[bytr]

This month, EIZO will launch SQFHD (1920 x 1920) display, priced at 129,600 JPY in Japan.
It is very interesting, but too expensive.