PDA

View Full Version : [ubuntu] Question Amd64 bit or 32 Bit ?



Blue-Fox
April 18th, 2014, 02:47 AM
Planning on doing a clean install of Ubuntu 14.04. I have an AMD Athalon 64bit processor. The pc only has 512 ram.

My question is should I use the Amd64 bit or 32 Bit version of Ubuntu 14.04?
Plan on upgrading the memory but not sure how much I can add.

Thank you for your help.

jbaerboc
April 18th, 2014, 02:50 AM
I would say go with 64 bit right of the bat. If you are planning on adding anything above 3gb-4gb then you'll need 64 bit to actually use that amount of ram anyway. I have 64-bit running with 8gb of ram.

Blue-Fox
April 18th, 2014, 02:53 AM
Thanks for the input. I had been using lubuntu 14.04 beta2 for a few days while I was waiting for the ubuntu 14.04 Lts to be released and it seamed to work ok.

su:bhatta
April 18th, 2014, 03:59 AM
If you are planning on adding anything above 3gb-4gb then you'll need 64 bit to actually use that amount of ram anyway. I have 64-bit running with 8gb of ram.

This is not required actually. Even if you install 32Bit, it will be able to use 4GB or 8Gb RAM.
Actually, 32Bit system supports upto 64Gb RAM.

But since the CPU architecture is 64Bit, it's best you use 64 Bit ISO and install.
Also, since you are already running the Beta2, running the following commands in a terminal will upgrade your present installation to 14.04 LTS:


sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
sudo apt-get -f install

Muhammad_Ahmad_Mujtaba
April 18th, 2014, 04:27 AM
This is not required actually. Even if you install 32Bit, it will be able to use 4GB or 8Gb RAM.Actually, 32Bit system supports upto 64Gb RAM.Yeah supports only, but cannot utilize more than 4GB [in many cases, not completely 4GB RAM itself is utilized.]I have PC's in my university which are 32bit architecture PC's and when i see their RAM's [manually , in the motherboard, it says 8GB]but it only shows round around 4GB [not completely 4GB] because of 32 bit long addresses which can max access 4GB at a time

su:bhatta
April 18th, 2014, 04:51 AM
Yeah supports only, but cannot utilize more than 4GB [in many cases, not completely 4GB RAM itself is utilized.]I have PC's in my university which are 32bit architecture PC's and when i see their RAM's [manually , in the motherboard, it says 8GB]but it only shows round around 4GB [not completely 4GB] because of 32 bit long addresses which can max access 4GB at a time

Is this with Linux or Windows?

Have a look here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/32bit_and_64bit
with pae, Ubuntu utilizes 64Gb RAm on 32bit architecture.

jbaerboc
April 18th, 2014, 05:19 AM
Is this with Linux or Windows?

Have a look here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/32bit_and_64bit
with pae, Ubuntu utilizes 64Gb RAm on 32bit architecture.

I definitely did not know PAE could do that. That being said unless your CPU is not 64-bit why on earth would you go with 32-bit with that much RAM? This part grabbed my attention:

"If you are doing heavy work where you have started to hit the 4GB memory barrier, then 64-bit is for you. Certain intensive tasks such as encoding video or audio also run significantly faster on 64-bit operating systems (NOTE: this is implementation specific).
Phoronix has done some testing (http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_32_pae&num=1) (2009), comparing 32bit/PAE/64bit, and this seems to indicate that 64bit performs better than 32bit in almost all cases."

Muhammad_Ahmad_Mujtaba
April 18th, 2014, 05:46 AM
PAE, how can i forget this , doh! i learned about it in intel 8088 processor assembly language course, therefore, yes you can do 32 bits extended stuff in Ubuntu OS but my university works with WINDOWS and windows is we all know what xD

sudodus
April 18th, 2014, 09:53 AM
I definitely did not know PAE could do that. That being said unless your CPU is not 64-bit why on earth would you go with 32-bit with that much RAM? This part grabbed my attention:

"If you are doing heavy work where you have started to hit the 4GB memory barrier, then 64-bit is for you. Certain intensive tasks such as encoding video or audio also run significantly faster on 64-bit operating systems (NOTE: this is implementation specific).
Phoronix has done some testing (http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_32_pae&num=1) (2009), comparing 32bit/PAE/64bit, and this seems to indicate that 64bit performs better than 32bit in almost all cases."

In the beginning (and for several years) many tasks were running better in 32-bit systems compared to 64-bit systems, but gradually the software (application programs) take full advantage of the 64-bit architechture. One drawback of 64-bit systems is that they require more RAM for a certain task, so with low RAM, say below 4 GB, it might be better to use a 32-bit system. But with 4 GB or more, I think most people would recommend 64 bits.

jbaerboc
April 18th, 2014, 06:44 PM
In the beginning (and for several years) many tasks were running better in 32-bit systems compared to 64-bit systems, but gradually the software (application programs) take full advantage of the 64-bit architechture. One drawback of 64-bit systems is that they require more RAM for a certain task, so with low RAM, say below 4 GB, it might be better to use a 32-bit system. But with 4 GB or more, I think most people would recommend 64 bits.

I love how one can learn so much from these forums :D