greyday
February 13th, 2014, 02:51 PM
Hi all--I've read through several of the threads on slow resync times and haven't found an answer; I tried setting the min and max values higher and higher, as well as trying the bitmap trick (ended up having the resync drop to about 10% the lowest speed without (literally 12K at one point), destroyed and rebuilt the RAID without). I am stumped; info on the setup and situation:
Resyncs have always been slow on my server but I always assumed it was a result of the build being a simple dual-atom setup. I just retired a main workstation and swapped it into the case, it is now a gigabyte P55a-ud3 (1156) with a quad core i7 2.8gHz processor and 8gb ram. There are three RAIDs, all run off the intel chipset on the motherboard running from a 12 driverack case (2 5-port multipliers and 2 direct), just using straight esata-->sata converters (the system drive is a hardware RAID0 of two small SSDs, running off the marvel chipset--yes, I know it's a faulty sata3 chipset, but both drives are sata2 and seems to deliver decently). This was by choice, as I was having problems with the pcie esata cards I was using on the old build (multiple drive failures with drives that tested clean using smartmontools). The new setup is definitely more reliable; however, the lag is ridiculous, the resyncs are running slower than the atom setup, and the system is reporting 7% of RAM used and pretty much 0% cpu usage DURING the rebuild. I have two RAIDs resyncing and one running:
md0=RAID5, 4x1tb (active)
md1=RAID5, 3x2tb (rebuilding, average speed around 2000k/sec)
md2=RAID6, 5x1.5tb (initial sync after zeroing all superblocks, average speed around 400k/sec)
Currently running headless (removed the graphics card entirely to cut down on energy consumption). Fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04.4 lts. Only added installs are mdadm (obviously), plexmediaserver, and smartmontools. Did a minimal base install, only selecting samba.
Part of the point of swapping to a less energy-efficient system was to improve performance (and reliability, so I'm 1 for 2 so far). I just don't get why, with all the processing power and memory available, the resyncs are running so slow. Even allowing for the port multipliers, doing the math all 8 drives working are running at wayyy less than a single drive would. Any ideas?
Resyncs have always been slow on my server but I always assumed it was a result of the build being a simple dual-atom setup. I just retired a main workstation and swapped it into the case, it is now a gigabyte P55a-ud3 (1156) with a quad core i7 2.8gHz processor and 8gb ram. There are three RAIDs, all run off the intel chipset on the motherboard running from a 12 driverack case (2 5-port multipliers and 2 direct), just using straight esata-->sata converters (the system drive is a hardware RAID0 of two small SSDs, running off the marvel chipset--yes, I know it's a faulty sata3 chipset, but both drives are sata2 and seems to deliver decently). This was by choice, as I was having problems with the pcie esata cards I was using on the old build (multiple drive failures with drives that tested clean using smartmontools). The new setup is definitely more reliable; however, the lag is ridiculous, the resyncs are running slower than the atom setup, and the system is reporting 7% of RAM used and pretty much 0% cpu usage DURING the rebuild. I have two RAIDs resyncing and one running:
md0=RAID5, 4x1tb (active)
md1=RAID5, 3x2tb (rebuilding, average speed around 2000k/sec)
md2=RAID6, 5x1.5tb (initial sync after zeroing all superblocks, average speed around 400k/sec)
Currently running headless (removed the graphics card entirely to cut down on energy consumption). Fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04.4 lts. Only added installs are mdadm (obviously), plexmediaserver, and smartmontools. Did a minimal base install, only selecting samba.
Part of the point of swapping to a less energy-efficient system was to improve performance (and reliability, so I'm 1 for 2 so far). I just don't get why, with all the processing power and memory available, the resyncs are running so slow. Even allowing for the port multipliers, doing the math all 8 drives working are running at wayyy less than a single drive would. Any ideas?