PDA

View Full Version : [ubuntu] Duplicate source list entry problem



ngchandrasekhar
May 20th, 2013, 06:44 AM
Hello
I while updating with sudo apt-get update I am getting some source list problem
sekhar@sekhar-laptop:~$ sudo apt-get update
[sudo] password for sekhar:

Get:1 http://ftp.iitm.ac.in lucid/ Release.gpg [490B]
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release.gpg
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/restricted Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Translation-en_IN
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release.gpg
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/restricted Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/universe Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/multiverse Translation-en_IN
Hit http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release.gpg
Ign http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ lucid/partner Translation-en_IN
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security Release.gpg
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/restricted Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/universe Translation-en_IN
Hit http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release
Ign http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/bin/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/ Translation-en_IN
Ign http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/multiverse Translation-en_IN
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release
Hit http://archive.canonical.com lucid/partner Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security Release
Hit http://archive.canonical.com lucid/partner Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/restricted Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/restricted Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/universe Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/universe Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/multiverse Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/multiverse Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/main Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/restricted Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/main Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/restricted Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/universe Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/universe Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/multiverse Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/multiverse Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/main Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/restricted Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/main Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/restricted Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/universe Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/universe Sources
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/multiverse Packages
Hit http://in.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-security/multiverse Sources
Get:2 http://ftp.iitm.ac.in lucid/ Release [2,270B]
Ign http://ftp.iitm.ac.in lucid/ Release
Get:3 http://ftp.iitm.ac.in lucid/ Packages [62.7kB]
Fetched 65.5kB in 9s (6,618B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.iitm.ac.in lucid/ Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 51716619E084DAB9
W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ lucid/partner Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.canonical.com_ubuntu_dists_lucid_partner_b inary-i386_Packages)

I tried to check the sources. list to find the duplicate sources. list..but could not solve the problem. but yes while running the sedu apt- get update second time its not sawing the warning.. but again the same warning is there ..I am attaching the sources. list below.


# deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 10.04 LTS _Lucid Lynx_ - Release i386 (20100429)]/ lucid main restricted
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.

deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted

## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid universe
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid universe
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates universe
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates universe

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid multiverse
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid multiverse
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates multiverse
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates multiverse

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports'
## repository.
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
# deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse
# deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner
deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner

deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security main restricted
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security main restricted
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security universe
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security universe
deb http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security multiverse
deb-src http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security multiverse
deb http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/bin/linux/ubuntu lucid/[/QUOTE]



Please help me solving the problem . Thank you with regards .

claracc
May 20th, 2013, 07:01 AM
About the key error in http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/bin/linux/ubuntu, you have explanation in the site:


Announcement: Due to sever issues, the Ubuntu CRAN packages have been signed with a new pgp key. See SECURE APT below

So you will have to add the new key in the way addressed in the web:

sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys E084DAB9

ajgreeny
May 20th, 2013, 10:49 AM
Lucid has now lost its support so you will need to update to a newer ubuntu version, I'm afraid.

Forget about the duplicate sources; you will not be able to easily update any more. I suggest 12.04 as the best option for you, and if you don't want or like unity try Xubuntu 12.04 instead. Xubuntu has a more conventional DE and you will probably find that it is very like ubuntu Lucid in many ways.

fantab
May 20th, 2013, 12:58 PM
+1 to ajgreeny.
Your issue is not what it says it is. Its that Lucid is dead, no more updates. You have to install 12.04.

ngchandrasekhar
May 22nd, 2013, 10:24 AM
+1 to ajgreeny.
Your issue is not what it says it is. Its that Lucid is dead, no more updates. You have to install 12.04.

thank you.. Does it mean no more ubuntu 10.04.?:confused:

ngchandrasekhar
May 22nd, 2013, 10:30 AM
thank you all .. But I still want to know if there is any other alternative solution rather upgrading to 12.04. Please help me thank you..Thank you again

fantab
May 22nd, 2013, 12:47 PM
thank you all .. But I still want to know if there is any other alternative solution rather upgrading to 12.04. Please help me thank you..Thank you again

Why do you want an "alternative solution rather upgrading to 12.04"? With all support for 10.04 has stopped there is no alterantive but to upgrade. Is there any special reason why you don't want to upgrade?

claracc
May 23rd, 2013, 08:29 AM
You can find more information in this link: http://askubuntu.com/questions/101479/are-existing-updates-available-after-end-of-support

Doing what this link indicates you can install software through synaptic or software center but you won't receive any update.

p-dh
May 23rd, 2013, 10:18 AM
Another solution is to try Y-PPA Manager (https://launchpad.net/~webupd8team/+archive/y-ppa-manager?field.series_filter=lucid) and let it fix the issue. 10.04 desktop has been sunsetted - 10.04 server still has two years. So, certain archives are and will be still available.
A quick addition is that I have updated all my 10.04 PCs to 12.04 - including a vastly underpowered netbook. They all run 12.04 at least as well as 10.04 with the added advantage of having desktop support through 2017.

Peace,
Paul :cool:

ngchandrasekhar
May 23rd, 2013, 04:43 PM
Thank you all for all the suggestion. The reason of retaining 10.04 was only because once I tried to upgrade to 11. 04 but it didnt goes well.. Now I have upgraded to 12.04. Thanks to all your suggestion.. but I have a small query. I found the upgrade versiono to be 32bit. As my processor is 64 bit. I want to know whether its alright or shall I download the 64 bit. Help me to know the differences between the two. Thank you again.

fantab
May 23rd, 2013, 04:52 PM
If your processor is 64bit then install 64bit Ubuntu, it will perform better than 32bit. 32bit is old technology while 64bit is newer.

ubu_dynamite
May 23rd, 2013, 05:17 PM
32bit will work just fine to 64bit consumes more ram so if your low on that stick with 32bit.

p-dh
May 23rd, 2013, 06:41 PM
If you had 32-bit 10.04 and did an in-place upgrade, you would receive the 32-bit 12.04. You cannot simply upgrade from 32-bit to 64-bit, you must do a reinstall.
For more info on the difference between 32-bit and 64-bit, here (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/32bit_and_64bit) is a good place to start. The original issues associated with running 64-bit have disappeared (I simply haven't seen any) and it's worth considering if you are doing a new install or setting up a new PC.

Peace,
Paul :cool: