PDA

View Full Version : [all variants] Is a re-installation needed after hardware upgrade?



SpudULike
January 7th, 2013, 04:00 PM
Hi,
I had a 12.10 system running on a:-

* Processor 2x Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz
* Memory 2060MB

but I have now updated the hardware, swapped out the motherboard, processor, and memory so I now have:-

* Processor 6x AMD FX(tm)-6200 Six-Core Processor
* Memory 8269MB

The machine still boots from the existing installation, once I found it on my sprawling collection of hard dives and got the boot order established.

Is it necessary to do a new installation to take full advantage of the new hardware? I would prefer not to do a complete install, but would much rather refresh the current. How would I do this?

Bufeu
January 7th, 2013, 04:05 PM
No, I don't think so. Linux should handle new hardware quite well. Just be sure that you download and install the latest drivers for your graphic card and CPU (use Jockey, a.k.a. "Additional drivers").

grahammechanical
January 7th, 2013, 04:30 PM
You can run the command


sudo lshw -html > hardwareprofile.html

That will create a document called hardwareprofile.html. It will open in a web browser and it should list all the hardware. See, if it matches the specification given in the motherboard user guide and what you know of the hardware.

Regards.

darkod
January 7th, 2013, 04:32 PM
I agree. There is no need to "refresh" anything. If it works, it works.

I don't remember right now whether the AMD FX has integrated graphics like the AMD A series, but i think it doesn't. If you are using the same video card you did before, no need to do anything about the video drivers too.

If the CPU has integrated graphics that you started using now, you might need to activate the fglrx driver for AMD/ATI in Additional drivers.

Apart from that, nothing. In effect you only changed the CPU which doesn't involve much. Enjoy your faster ubuntu. :)

oldfred
January 7th, 2013, 04:42 PM
Because your old system only had 2GB did you have the 32bit version? While the 32bit versions now include PAE so it will see your 8GB of RAM, you really need the 64 bit version for that to be fully utilized.

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2028717
Ubuntu 12.10: 32-bit vs. 64-bit Linux Performance
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1210_3264&num=1
Assuming your hardware is x86_64 capable (basically any modern Intel/AMD CPU) and have at least 2GB of RAM, you really should be running the 64-bit version.
Essentially says if you can use the 64bit kernel you should.April 2011
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_natty_pae64&num=1
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/32bit_and_64bit
Ubuntu 32-bit, 32-bit PAE, 64-bit Kernel Benchmarks Dec 2009
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_32_pae&num=1
Linus does not like PAE or 32 bit.
http://cl4ssic4l.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/linus-torvalds-about-pae/

You do have to do a new install to convert from 32bit to 64 bit. If separate /home it is easier or fully backup /home. Also export list of installed apps to make it easier to reinstall.

gordintoronto
January 7th, 2013, 11:31 PM
With PAE, a single program can not use more than 4 GB of memory. There are very few programs which want that much memory, so switching to a 64-bit version should be low priority -- unless you plan to do large video-editing projects.

If you change video cards, that can trigger a re-install, CPUs not so much. (Even the video card should be OK if you remove any Additional Driver *before* you make the change.)