PDA

View Full Version : [SOLVED] unmet dependencies



MikeCyber
August 21st, 2012, 12:16 PM
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libasound2-dev : Depends: libasound2 (= 1.0.25-1ubuntu10)
libqt4-dev : Depends: libqt4-dbus (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-help (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libqt4-network (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-qt3support (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-script (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-scripttools (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libqt4-sql (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-svg (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-test (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libqt4-xml (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is to be installed
Depends: qt4-linguist-tools (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: libqt4-opengl-dev (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: libqtwebkit-dev (>= 2.0~) but it is not going to be installed
libsvn-dev : Depends: libaprutil1-dev but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
michael@michael-ubuntu:/media/DATA/FGFSn$

sigh...what to do?
Thanks

MikeCyber
August 21st, 2012, 12:52 PM
solved by manually selecting qt4 in the update manager.

The update manager is kind of freaky. Selecting all would have broken my system! Xorg breaking Nvidia and kernel most likely the whole OS.
Freaky...yea Linux still is...

cortman
August 21st, 2012, 02:24 PM
solved by manually selecting qt4 in the update manager.

The update manager is kind of freaky. Selecting all would have broken my system! Xorg breaking Nvidia and kernel most likely the whole OS.
Freaky...yea Linux still is...

How do you know that these updates would have "broken your system"?

Bucky Ball
August 21st, 2012, 02:45 PM
solved by manually selecting qt4 in the update manager.

The update manager is kind of freaky.

Not suprisingly. Now you've solved the problem you can see all the missing dependencies contained 'qt' so freaky becomes obvious. But freaky things sometimes do happen, yes! It's the ones that take two days to figure out I don't love. ;)

Please mark as 'Solved' from thread tools to help others.

MikeCyber
August 21st, 2012, 06:49 PM
Yes my fault. I had another conflict tiff - jpeg62, hence I decided to risk a full update. Reinstalled Nvidia and all is fine. The only drawback seems that a full update installs all kind of stuff.
Some years this went wrong but apparently this has improved. ;)

jcoles
September 7th, 2012, 02:38 AM
solved by manually selecting qt4 in the update manager.

The update manager is kind of freaky. Selecting all would have broken my system! Xorg breaking Nvidia and kernel most likely the whole OS.
Freaky...yea Linux still is...

I have a similar problem with apache. But I don't understand how I can select a specific application in the Update Manager. The only packages listed there are the ones with available updates. Can you explain what you mean?

Bucky Ball
September 7th, 2012, 07:49 AM
I have a similar problem with apache. But I don't understand how I can select a specific application in the Update Manager. The only packages listed there are the ones with available updates. Can you explain what you mean?

This thread has been inactive for two weeks and the OP's problem has been solved. I advise you start a new thread with a descriptive title and give as much info as possible about YOUR problem specifically. You will get more help that way. Thanks and good luck. ;)

jcoles
September 8th, 2012, 12:22 AM
This thread has been inactive for two weeks and the OP's problem has been solved. I advise you start a new thread with a descriptive title and give as much info as possible about YOUR problem specifically. You will get more help that way. Thanks and good luck. ;)

Thanks for the advice.
Perhaps I misunderstood the injunction to "Search before posting a thread." If the found threads don't have the answer I need, then a new thread is best?

BlinkinCat
September 8th, 2012, 12:24 AM
Thanks for the advice.
Perhaps I misunderstood the injunction to "Search before posting a thread." If the found threads don't have the answer I need, then a new thread is best?

Yes - ;)