PDA

View Full Version : 6 Web Browsers and their html 5 support scores.



MasterNetra
August 30th, 2011, 10:50 PM
Ok, So I tested the lastest version of 6 different web browsers to see which one had the best html5 support, the browsers where: IE9, Safari 5.1, Firefox 6, Chrome ( 13.0.782.218 ), Opera 11.50, and a smaller time browser Midori 0.4.0 .

Each were tested on http://html5test.com/ , the site shows the specific things the the browser viewing it supports as well as a score the that is calculated based on it. For the sake of space I will just post the scores (The scores are out of 450 possible);

Chrome: 340 (Plus 13 bonus points)
Firefox: 298 (Plus 9 bonus points)
Opera: 286 (Plus 7 bonus points)
Safari: 252 (Plus 2 bonus points)
Midori: 176 (No bonus points)
IE9: 141 (Plus 5 bonus points)

haqking
August 30th, 2011, 10:58 PM
Ok, So I tested the lastest version of 6 different web browsers to see which one had the best html5 support, the browsers where: IE9, Safari 5.1, Firefox 6, Chrome ( 13.0.782.218 ), Opera 11.50, and a smaller time browser Midori 0.4.0 .

Each were tested on http://html5test.com/ , the site shows the specific things the the browser viewing it supports as well as a score the that is calculated based on it. For the sake of space I will just post the scores (The scores are out of 450 possible);

Chrome: 340 (Plus 13 bonus points)
Firefox: 298 (Plus 9 bonus points)
Opera: 286 (Plus 7 bonus points)
Safari: 252 (Plus 2 bonus points)
Midori: 176 (No bonus points)
IE9: 141 (Plus 5 bonus points)

well i just used firefox 6 and got 313 + 9 points and chrome i got 337 points + 13 ;-)

BeRoot ReBoot
August 30th, 2011, 11:00 PM
313+9 on Firefox 6 from the official 11.04 repos here.
EDIT: 337+13 on whatever version of chromium-browser is in the repos.

MasterNetra
August 30th, 2011, 11:00 PM
well i just used firefox 6 and got 323 + 9 points and chrome i got 337 points + 13 ;-)

I am running the windows versions of them. On win 7.

Weird how their scores are varying. Guess it defers to some degree on different OS's?

Bachstelze
August 30th, 2011, 11:01 PM
I got 313 on FF 6.

haqking
August 30th, 2011, 11:05 PM
my bad 313 not 323 on FF6 in 10.10

cbowman57
August 30th, 2011, 11:08 PM
313+9

FF6 on Arch (at the moment)

Bachstelze
August 30th, 2011, 11:09 PM
293+14 in Epiphany, 231+10 on Arora, 92+6 on Konqueror. :p

Erik1984
August 30th, 2011, 11:14 PM
That's strange I'm getting 298+9 for FireFox 6 in Natty while other report 313

marin123
August 30th, 2011, 11:32 PM
That's strange I'm getting 298+9 for FireFox 6 in Natty while other report 313

Me too 298+9.

On chromium I got 322 + 13.

Ubuntu natty 64 bit with latest updates. I'm going to test oneiric tomorrow with FF 7.

Frogs Hair
August 30th, 2011, 11:39 PM
314 +9 FF9 Nightly

Bandit
August 30th, 2011, 11:41 PM
Chrome may score the highest on HTML5 support. But lacks support for other things like XML/XSLT.

FatalMessenger
August 30th, 2011, 11:56 PM
313 + 9 with FF6 on 10.04.3 64-bit.

Give mozilla a while and the scores will probably go up.

juancarlospaco
August 31st, 2011, 12:08 AM
Just saying...,
that Test try to access a local Webcam, so if you dont have one, or its turned Off, it will discount points,
the same with an OpenGL video card.

3Miro
August 31st, 2011, 12:11 AM
Gentoo Linux:

Chromium 13.0.782.215 = 337 + 9 bonus
Firefox 6 = 313 + 9 bonus
Midori 0.3.3 = 217 + 11! bonus

Midory got a lot of bonus points on the Video section, H.264 and MPEG-4 support seem to be the reason. Maybe I messed up something about the build tags in Chromium and Firefox (both are custom build, not the distributed binaries).

Dangertux
August 31st, 2011, 12:23 AM
In addition to the web cam. It also is testing for certain codec support.

In my opinion that is probably not the most accurate test :/

KBD47
August 31st, 2011, 02:17 AM
Chrome 324 and 13 bonus
FF6 313 and 9 bonus running Natty.

Legendary_Bibo
August 31st, 2011, 03:23 AM
322+13 on Chrome on Fuduntu 14.

Bandit
August 31st, 2011, 04:48 AM
In addition to the web cam. It also is testing for certain codec support.

In my opinion that is probably not the most accurate test :/

I agree. Its testing features outside of the browsers control.

ilovelinux33467
August 31st, 2011, 10:57 AM
Firefox 6 on Fedora 15 I get 298 + 9 bonus points.

tmette
August 31st, 2011, 02:19 PM
I also got 298+9 with Firefox 6.0.1 on Win7.

KUU
August 31st, 2011, 02:31 PM
FF 6 on MacOS X

http://uppix.net/3/6/3/9e124af1f478d860748ecbc8c9396.png (http://uppix.net/3/6/3/9e124af1f478d860748ecbc8c9396.html)



Safari 5 on MacOS X

http://uppix.net/7/2/c/80515ebecb0883d74fc7a73d0413a.png (http://uppix.net/7/2/c/80515ebecb0883d74fc7a73d0413a.html)


Chrome 13 on MacOS X

http://uppix.net/1/0/6/b503effaedf92b2130ef67f45ddd9.png (http://uppix.net/1/0/6/b503effaedf92b2130ef67f45ddd9.html)

eriktheblu
August 31st, 2011, 03:10 PM
Firefox 3.6.20 scored 179 +4
IE 7 scores 25 (no bonus)

Through Vista

Merk42
August 31st, 2011, 03:31 PM
Firefox 3.6.20 scored 179 +4
IE 7 scores 25 (no bonus)

Through Vista
IE8 (emulated in Windows 7) scored 41 + 0
IE9 scored 141 + 5 (yes 100 more points)
IE10PP2 scored 231 + 6

forrestcupp
August 31st, 2011, 08:35 PM
I am running the windows versions of them. On win 7.

Weird how their scores are varying. Guess it defers to some degree on different OS's?

I'm running the Windows version of Firefox 6.0.1 on Win7, also. But I got 313 +9. Maybe the minor update boosted it a little.

Jesus_Valdez
August 31st, 2011, 10:29 PM
Midori scores 308 + 14 Bonus points.

Ubuntu 11.04 64 bits, Midori 0.4.0

Merk42
September 1st, 2011, 01:07 AM
I'm running the Windows version of Firefox 6.0.1 on Win7, also. But I got 313 +9. Maybe the minor update boosted it a little.This test is about standards, not how fast it can run, like peacekeeper (http://clients.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action).
The discrepancies in scores of the same browser versions are most likely if said computer has a webcam/video card/etc.

forrestcupp
September 1st, 2011, 12:43 PM
This test is about standards, not how fast it can run, like peacekeeper (http://clients.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action).
The discrepancies in scores of the same browser versions are most likely if said computer has a webcam/video card/etc.

If that's true, it's kind of strange that everyone is getting the same numbers with only 2 variations. I know there are a lot more variations in computers than that. It would make a lot more sense to me that the 0.1 Firefox update added something to add to html5 compatibility. That's what I meant by getting a boost, not speed.

cbowman57
September 1st, 2011, 12:48 PM
Obviously the rating isn't a benchmark, simply weighted based on capability & features.

Lucradia
September 1st, 2011, 01:02 PM
Firefox 6 gets: 313 and 9 bonus points on Windows 7 x64.

Also gets 97/100 on Acid3: http://acid3.acidtests.org/

if Mozilla wants to do what they really desire (soon) with Firefox, they will need to add "Web Notifications" and "Webcam Access" at the very least, which Firefox 6 has none of.

ilovelinux33467
September 1st, 2011, 01:35 PM
Chromium 13.0.782.215 on Fedora 15 gives me 322 + 13 bonus points.

Merk42
September 1st, 2011, 01:59 PM
If that's true, it's kind of strange that everyone is getting the same numbers with only 2 variations. I know there are a lot more variations in computers than that. It would make a lot more sense to me that the 0.1 Firefox update added something to add to html5 compatibility. That's what I meant by getting a boost, not speed.That's exactly why the numbers are quite the same. The few variations are probably people that do/don't have a webcam/video card/etc.
This tests only checks if the browser can or can't do something. So you could take the same computer, run the test, then upgrade its RAM and processor, but kept the OS and browser version, you'd get the same result.
The 0.1 update was a security update, having absolutely 0 effect on rendering features.
Obviously the rating isn't a benchmark, simply weighted based on capability & features.This.

aura7
September 1st, 2011, 02:14 PM
I got 298 + 9 bonus for FF 6 installed using mozilla ppa on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

forrestcupp
September 1st, 2011, 06:13 PM
That's exactly why the numbers are quite the same. The few variations are probably people that do/don't have a webcam/video card/etc.
Who is going to test it without a video card? If that's true, then I'd say the only difference is whether or not someone has a webcam. Maybe the people getting a slightly lower number do not have a webcam.

juancarlospaco
September 1st, 2011, 06:55 PM
Meh..., today i discovered Firefox 9 dont support HTML5 Meter tag ಠ_ಠ

My example :


<meter style="width:100%;height:20px;" title="Time" max="30" low="10" high="20" optimum="15" value="12">Your Browser DONT support HTML5 Meter tag.</meter>

Merk42
September 1st, 2011, 07:14 PM
Meh..., today i discovered Firefox 9 dont support HTML5 Meter tag ಠ_ಠ

My example :


<meter style="width:100%;height:20px;" title="Time" max="30" low="10" high="20" optimum="15" value="12">Your Browser DONT support HTML5 Meter tag.</meter>

I think you meant this thread (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1818283)

Firefox doesn't fully support it yet, you need CSS styling right now (and I would think most places that would use it would style it anyway).

Just go [url=http://caniuse.com/#compare=y&b1=firefox+6&b2=chrome+13]here[/url if you want to compare what Firefox can('t) do vs. what Chrome can('t) do. Yes Chrome has a better record, but there still are some some reasons to go all ಠ_ಠ at Chrome too.