mo.reina

November 5th, 2010, 04:49 PM

is it actually possible to evaluate the second expression by hand? surely there must be a better way instead of substituting all the way down? you'd need to use a whole wall to do it!

View Full Version : Sicp 1.10

mo.reina

November 5th, 2010, 04:49 PM

is it actually possible to evaluate the second expression by hand? surely there must be a better way instead of substituting all the way down? you'd need to use a whole wall to do it!

saulgoode

November 5th, 2010, 10:53 PM

After you've completed the first expression, you should be able to determine the simple function (f y) which is equivalent to (A 1 y).

Then when evaluating the second expression, don't expand out any of the steps when you encounter a (A 1 y); just evaluate y and afterward map it to (f y).

In other words, when the second expression is evaluated, the first substitution will result in (A 1 (A 2 3)). Noting that you've generically solved this expression, it is only necessary to evaluate (A 2 3) [and then substitute the result back into (f y)].

Then when evaluating the second expression, don't expand out any of the steps when you encounter a (A 1 y); just evaluate y and afterward map it to (f y).

In other words, when the second expression is evaluated, the first substitution will result in (A 1 (A 2 3)). Noting that you've generically solved this expression, it is only necessary to evaluate (A 2 3) [and then substitute the result back into (f y)].

Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2016 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.