PDA

View Full Version : Duke Nukem Forever finally comming out!!!!!!



linux18
September 4th, 2010, 05:19 PM
It's only been in developement for 14 years.

http://pax.gamespot.com/story/6275153/duke-nukem-forever-shipping-in-2011-on-360-ps3-pc

Is it fake?
Am I dreaming?
Now what will win the vaporware award?
Is the end of the world near?

Naiki Muliaina
September 4th, 2010, 05:24 PM
OMG the sky is falling, sheep are really flying, and hells just called to say they are serving chilled beer....

Does this mean we are going to need a new games project to take the mickey out of when discussing release dates?.... ):P

Random_Dude
September 4th, 2010, 05:32 PM
Finally!

linux18
September 4th, 2010, 05:38 PM
Quick! we need a vaporware replacement to keep the universe from imploding, ET: The Sequel maybe?

pwnst*r
September 4th, 2010, 05:41 PM
It better be $10

FuturePilot
September 4th, 2010, 06:05 PM
Quick! we need a vaporware replacement to keep the universe from imploding, ET: The Sequel maybe?

GNU Hurd. :P

linux18
September 4th, 2010, 06:21 PM
GNU Hurd. :P
Ah, the universe is saved, but just for good measure we should arrange ningas to attack richard stallman

linux18
September 4th, 2010, 06:48 PM
controller config:
http://i54.tinypic.com/2jbuznp.jpg

Dustin2128
September 4th, 2010, 07:11 PM
gasp! I heard it was only available on hurd! Hurd won't work people, we need something new, fast!

kamaboko
September 4th, 2010, 07:14 PM
Well, this calls for a celebration!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzxWZupHWkc

Guilden_NL
September 4th, 2010, 07:27 PM
I never knew he was in the closet.... :razz:

Lots of memories, and sadly I don't think the latest version can match them. I hope that I am wrong, but Duke was the best way back in the day. Then along came Wolfenstein....

DeadSuperHero
September 4th, 2010, 08:35 PM
It'd be really amazing if a Linux port ever saw the light of day.


I'm being serious. :|

gnomeuser
September 4th, 2010, 09:23 PM
A working perpetual motion machine is just around the corner then

toupeiro
September 4th, 2010, 09:41 PM
While excited, I'll believe it when I see it. :)

I got equally excited when Lucas arts was developing Full Throttle 2, and even had a trailer, then subsequently pulled the game. I just don't think my heart can take it again. :P

Legendary_Bibo
September 4th, 2010, 09:41 PM
I remember over a year ago they had a trailer for it and everything and said it was coming out soon, but it never did.

toupeiro
September 4th, 2010, 09:45 PM
I have to admit though, I can't wait to kick *** and chew bubblegum, but I'm all out of gum!

NCLI
September 4th, 2010, 10:23 PM
The demo looks awesome! If it really is released, I'll buy three copies. One to play, one to keep safe, and one extra to be safe.

Random_Dude
September 4th, 2010, 10:28 PM
I have to admit though, I can't wait to kick *** and chew bubblegum, but I'm all out of gum!

Amen.

linux18
September 4th, 2010, 11:32 PM
Lots of memories, and sadly I don't think the latest version can match them.


The game starts with a tourial on how to use a urinal and there is a button on the controller for be*cough*er, I think it's possibly better than DN 3D when you subtract the nostalgia.

NCLI
September 4th, 2010, 11:41 PM
The game starts with a tourial on how to use a urinal and there is a button on the controller for be*cough*er, I think it's possibly better than DN 3D when you subtract the nostalgia.

And the level ends with... well, Duke getting intimate with two twins, and saying something like "This has better be good, it's been twelve years in the making." Whether that is a reference to the age of the twins or the games developement, I leave to you to decide :s

linux18
September 5th, 2010, 12:07 AM
google trends statistics for the last 30 days:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=duke+nukem%2Cduke+nukem+forever%2Cgearbox %2C3d+realms&ctab=0&geo=all&date=mtd&sort=0

at this rate, DNF news will constitute 75% of all news in 6 days, and create a search/news apocolypse by the time it comes out. looks like the world will end when DNF gets released

chessnerd
September 5th, 2010, 01:07 AM
We'll see. 2011 is still a year away and while portions of the game may be playable, it is still in development.

Case and point - in 2002 Richard Stallman said that the GNU Hurd kernel was working and that it could be released by the end of the year.[1] (http://www.pcworld.com/article/88464/free_software_sees_gnu_loose_of_linux.html) It's great that 8 years later we have so many production machines running a totally free GNU system with a microkernel.

When Duke Nukem Forever actually hits the shelves, then you can say that it is done. It is far from done.

If it is really getting released, I'm hoping it will get delayed one more year and be released on 12/21/12 just to freak everyone out.

1. ^ http://www.pcworld.com/article/88464/free_software_sees_gnu_loose_of_linux.html

linux18
September 5th, 2010, 01:27 AM
We'll see. 2011 is still a year away and while portions of the game may be playable, it is still in development.

Case and point - in 2002 Richard Stallman said that the GNU Hurd kernel was working and that it could be released by the end of the year.[1] (http://www.pcworld.com/article/88464/free_software_sees_gnu_loose_of_linux.html) It's great that 8 years later we have so many production machines running a totally free GNU system with a microkernel.

When Duke Nukem Forever actually hits the shelves, then you can say that it is done. It is far from done.

If it is really getting released, I'm hoping it will get delayed one more year and be released on 12/21/12 just to freak everyone out.

1. ^ http://www.pcworld.com/article/88464/free_software_sees_gnu_loose_of_linux.html
LOL, I enjoy wikipedia citations in forum posts.

+1 for 12/21/12 after 13 years, whats another 2 to freak people out

foxxxy
September 5th, 2010, 02:26 AM
It's about time :) They better add it in the Ubuntu repos :)

Dustin2128
September 5th, 2010, 04:30 AM
in other news, scientists have achieved a positive energy output on a dishwasher sized cold fusion reactor. Heh, at academic team practice just the day before yesterday, there was a question series on of computer software terms. It cited examples, e.g. DOOM for shareware, and DNF was number one on the list for vaporware.

Someone uk
September 5th, 2010, 01:08 PM
yatzee gave DNF a good reveiw :p:lolflag:

gnomeuser
September 5th, 2010, 01:13 PM
yatzee gave DNF a good reveiw :p:lolflag:

Now I know this is all just a practical joke

llua+
September 5th, 2010, 02:35 PM
3 pages and no "I've got balls of steel" joke.
so disappointed.

linux18
September 5th, 2010, 04:24 PM
yatzee gave DNF a good reveiw :p:lolflag:
And that review was voted best one by the fans: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation/1968-Viewers-Choice-Duke-Nukem-Forever




3 pages and no "I've got balls of steel" joke.
so disappointed.

We should get those all out of the way now:
http://images.eurogamer.net/assets/articles//a/1/2/5/0/7/6/3/ss_preview_e3e0b.jpg.jpg
"I've got balls of steel!"


http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_img_1781-w1200.jpg
"Hail to the king baby!"


http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_img_1783-w1200.jpg
"Always bet on Duke!"


http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_500x_moreduke.jpg
"Your @$$ is grass and I'm the weed wacker."


http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_img_1780-w1200.jpg
"It's time to kick some @$$ and chew bubble gum, and I'm all out of gum."

kamaboko
September 5th, 2010, 06:03 PM
Question: How much are you willing to pay for a copy of DNF?

Naiki Muliaina
September 5th, 2010, 06:16 PM
I am always happy to pay for decent games released on Linux :) Guessing DNF wont be and the only other up to date console i have is a DSi.

linux18
September 5th, 2010, 06:19 PM
Question: How much are you willing to pay for a copy of DNF?
about 14 years and $60

NCLI
September 5th, 2010, 07:20 PM
Question: How much are you willing to pay for a copy of DNF?

Pretty much anything, to be honest. It's already a legendary game.

Spice Weasel
September 5th, 2010, 08:05 PM
FINALLY!

So happy right now, but I'd be fine with playing eDuke32 "forever". :D

nrs
September 5th, 2010, 08:08 PM
I remember over a year ago they had a trailer for it and everything and said it was coming out soon, but it never did.
Development has been taken over by a competent studio. Same people that did Borderlands.

kamaboko
September 5th, 2010, 11:07 PM
May have to pull out the old DN Halloween costume this year.

linux18
September 5th, 2010, 11:36 PM
May have to pull out the old DN Halloween costume this year.
and carve pumkins:
http://www.3drealms.com/fanstuff/images/dukepumpkin.JPG

Legendary_Bibo
September 5th, 2010, 11:47 PM
Development has been taken over by a competent studio. Same people that did Borderlands.

Yeah why did the game take so long for it to come out? I've never played the duke nukem games, Doom, or Quake and yet my only introduction to these old series has been Quake 4, Doom 3, and now DNF. It looks good, and not like so many generic FPS's out there. I still don't like the half life games, I played the Orange Box and couldn't figure out what was so great about HL2. I still like Team Fortress 2 and Portal though those made the entire Orange Box worth it so much so that I bought TF2 and Portal on Steam when I used to have Windows to play on PC. Good times.

murderslastcrow
September 6th, 2010, 01:01 AM
The game took so long because the producer kept redeciding what he wanted to do with it. I'm sure they actually got some models and maybe even some code from the old studio to put into this.

They say it's taken them a year so far, and for this company (think about how long Borderlands took to make) a year is a very long time to make a game. It's insane to think what will be in it now, but it's also amusing to think that, because they have the game in the hands of the right people now, who can focus, they can bring all the ideas and work together from a decade and put it into a year's worth of production.

Of course, depending on how many and what kind of people you have working for you. For someone like me, who has made a gaming going all-solo, I know there are some games only one person could make. If you have enough hands and the right idea, you can kick it hardcore.

linux18
September 6th, 2010, 01:23 AM
a "little" history courtesy of wikipedia:





Quake engine, 1997–1998

Duke Nukem Forever was officially announced on April 28, 1997,[14] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-wernicke-1-13) with the intention of releasing the game no later than mid-1998.[15] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-14) Barely a year after the release of Duke Nukem 3D, the game's graphics and its game engine, Build, were antiquated. Id Software's new Quake II engine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Id_Tech_2) was far superior to Build, so Broussard decided to license it.[14] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-wernicke-1-13)[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15) The price spent for the licensing rights was steep—estimates were as high as $500,000—but Broussard reasoned that it would save time used to write a game engine from scratch.[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15) Broussard and Miller were flush with cash from sale of Duke Nukem 3D and other games, so they decided to fund Duke Nukem Forever themselves, turning marketing and publishing rights over to GT Interactive (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT_Interactive).[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16)
In August and September, the first screenshots of Duke Nukem Forever were released in PC Gamer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Gamer). However, 3D Realms did not receive the Quake II engine code until November 1997, and the earlier screenshots were mock-ups with the Quake engine that the team had made in their spare time.[18] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-reed-17) 3D Realms unveiled the first video footage of Duke Nukem Forever using the Quake II engine at the 1998 Electronic Entertainment Expo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Entertainment_Expo) (E3) conference.[18] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-reed-17) The trailer showed Duke fighting on the back of a moving truck and firefights with aliens. While critics were impressed, Broussard was not happy with the progress being made.[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15)
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=4)] Unreal engine, 1998–2002

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b2/Duke_Nukem_Screenshot2.jpg/220px-Duke_Nukem_Screenshot2.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Duke_Nukem_Screenshot2.jpg) http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Duke_Nukem_Screenshot2.jpg)
Screenshot of Duke Nukem Forever from 1999.


Soon after the release of the Quake II engine, Epic Games (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games) had unveiled its own Unreal Engine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unreal_Engine). The Unreal Engine was more realistic than Quake II and was better suited to producing open spaces—3D Realms had been struggling to render the Nevada desert. Soon after E3, a programmer suggested that they make the switch. After discussions, the developers unanimously agreed to the change, which would mean scrapping much of their work so far,[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15) including significant changes 3D Realms had made to the Quake Engine.[19] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-wernicke-2-18) In June 1998, 14 months after the Quake II announcement, 3D Realms made the switch announcement. Broussard said that the game would not be "significantly delayed" by the switch, but that the project would be back to where it was at E3 "within a month to six weeks". Broussard also said that no content seen in the E3 trailer would be lost.[20] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-3drealms-engine_switch-19) Chris Hargrove, one of the game's programmers at the time, confided that the change amounted to a complete reboot of the project.[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15)
By the end of 1999, Duke Nukem Forever had missed several release dates and was largely unfinished; half the game's weapons remained concepts.[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15) Broussard shot back at criticisms of the game's lengthy development time as the price paid for developing complex modern games:
Today's games are MUCH more complex. In Duke Nukem 3D all the characters were sprites. Today they are polygonal models, have to be skinned, and then animated or motion captured. A very long, tedious and complex process. Also games today are "deeper" and require more than key/door stuff. That means more time to develop. Note all the so-so [first-person shooter] games that didn't sell well in the last two years and you will see that they were simple compared to more complex efforts like Half-Life (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Life_%28video_game%29). A game like Duke Nukem Forever is probably 5-10 times more complex than Duke Nukem 3D was.[21] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-ign-duke1999-20)
A significant factor contributing to the game's protracted development was that Broussard was continually looking to add new elements to the game. A running joke at 3D Realms was to stop Broussard from seeing a new video game, as he would want to include portions of it in Duke Nukem Forever. Later that year Broussard decided to upgrade to a new version of the Unreal engine that was designed for multiplayer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplayer) matches. Former employees recalled that Broussard did not have a plan for what the finished game would look like.[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-2-15) At the same time, GT Interactive was facing higher-than-expected losses and hired Bear Stearns (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns) to look into selling the company or merging it.[22] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-cnet-gt_interactive-21) Later that year Infogrames Entertainment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infogrames_Entertainment,_SA) announced it was purchasing a controlling interest in GT Interactive.[23] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-22) The publishing rights for Duke Nukem Forever passed to Gathering of Developers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gathering_of_Developers) in early December 2000.[24] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-23)
To placate anxious fans, Broussard decided to create another trailer for E3 2001—it was the first public look at the game in three years.[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) The video showed a couple of minutes of in-game footage,[25] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-ign-e32001-24) which notably showed the player moving in a what appears to be Las Vegas and a certain level of interactivity (the player buys a sandwich from a vending machine and pushes each individual button on a keypad (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keypad) with Duke's outstretched finger). The trailer was impressive, and Duke Nukem was the talk of the convention;[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) IGN reported on the games graphics that, "Characters come to life with picturesque facial animations that are synced perfectly with speech, hair that swings as they bob their heads, eyes that follow gazes, and more. The particle effects system, meanwhile, boasts impressive explosion effects with shimmering fire, shattered glass, and blood spilt in every direction [...] Add in real-time lighting effects, interactive environments, and a variation in locales unequaled in any other first-person shooter and you begin to see and understand why Duke Nukem Forever has been one of the most hotly anticipated titles over the last couple of years."[25] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-ign-e32001-24) Duke Nukem Forever looked as good or better than most games, and staff at 3D Realms recalled a sense of elation after the presentation; "The video was just being eaten up by people," one said. "We were so far ahead of other people at the time." While many of the staff expected Broussard to make a push for finishing the game, however, he still did not have a finished product in mind.[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) Following the death of one of Gathering of Developers' co-founders and continuing financial problems, the publishers' Texas-based offices were shut down and absorbed into parent company Take-Two Interactive (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take-Two_Interactive).[26] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thorsen2003-25)
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=5)] Conflict with Take-Two

By 2003, only 18 people at 3D Realms were working on the game. One former employee said that Broussard and Miller were still operating on a "1995 mentality", before games became large-team, big budget development affairs. Because they were financing the project themselves, the developers could also ignore pressure from their publisher;[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) their standard reply to when Duke Nukem Forever would ship was "when it's done".[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16)[27] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-morris2003-26) In 2003, Take-Two CEO Jeffrey Lapin reported that the game would not be out that year.[28] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-27) He further said the company was writing off $5.5 million from its earnings due to Duke Nukem Forever's lengthy development time.[27] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-morris2003-26) Broussard shot back that "Take-Two needs to STFU (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/STFU) ... We don’t want Take-Two saying stupid-*** things in public for the sole purposes of helping their stock. It's our time and our money we are spending on the game. So either we're absolutely stupid and clueless, or we believe in what we are working on."[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16)[27] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-morris2003-26) Later that year, Lapin said 3D Realms had told him that Duke Nukem Forever was expected to be finished by the end of 2004, or the beginning of 2005.[26] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thorsen2003-25)
In 2004, video game website GameSpot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameSpot) reported that Duke Nukem Forever had switched to the Doom 3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doom_3) engine.[29] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thorsen2004-28) Many gaming news sites mailed Broussard, asking him to confirm or deny the rumor. After receiving no answer from him, they published the rumor as fact, but Broussard explicitly denied the rumor soon after.[29] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thorsen2004-28) Soon after 3D Realms replaced the game's Karma physics system with one designed by Meqon (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meqon&action=edit&redlink=1), a relatively unknown Swedish firm. Closed-doors demonstrations of the technology suggested that the physics of Duke Nukem Forever would be a step up from the critically-acclaimed Half-Life 2 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-Life_2).[30] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-29) Rumors suggested that the game would appear at 2005 E3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E3_%28Electronic_Entertainment_Expo%29). While 3D Realms' previously-canceled Prey (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prey_%28video_game%29) made an appearance, the rumors of Duke Nukem Forever's appearance proved false.[31] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-30)
Broussard reported in a January 2006 interview that many of Duke Nukem Forever's elements had been finished; "we're just basically pulling it all together and trying to make it fun".[32] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-31) Later that year Broussard demonstrated samples of the game, including an early level, a vehicle sequence, and a few test rooms.[33] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-carless2006-32) Among the features seen was the interactive use of an in-game computer to send actual e-mails.[34] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-33) The developer seemed contrite and affected by the long delays; while a journalist demoed the game Broussard referenced note cards and constantly apologized for the state of the game.[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) In filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission), Take-Two revealed they had renegotiated the Duke Nukem Forever deal, with the developer receiving $4.25 million instead of $6 million on release of the game. Take-Two offered a $500,000 bonus if Duke Nukem Forever was commercially released by December 31, 2006.[33] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-carless2006-32) However, Broussard denied the rumors that DNF would be released, saying that 3D Realms never cared for or asked for the bonus. He stated that he would "never ship a game early."[35] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-34)
Some of the staff were tired of the delays—Duke Nukem Forever was the only 3D game many had worked on, giving them little to put on a resume, and as much of 3D Realms' payment hinged on profit-sharing after release, the continual delays meant deferred income.[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-3-16) By August 2006, between 7–10 employees had left since 2005, a majority of the Duke Nukem Forever team (which in recent months had shrunk to around 18 staff).[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-4-35)[37] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-36) While Shacknews (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shacknews) speculated that the departures would lead to further delays, 3D Realms denied the claims, stating that the employees had left over a number of months and that the game was still moving ahead.[38] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-37) Creative director Raphael van Lierop, hired in 2007, played through the completed content and realized that there was more finished than he expected. Lierop told Broussard that he felt they could push the game and "blow everyone out of the water", but Broussard responded that the game was still two years away from completion.[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-4-35)
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=6)] 2007–2009

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e0/Dukenukemforever2007.jpg/220px-Dukenukemforever2007.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dukenukemforever2007.jpg) http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dukenukemforever2007.jpg)
Duke Nukem Forever 2007 teaser screenshot


The long delay strained Broussard and Miller's relationship, and by the end of 2006 Broussard appeared to become serious about shipping the title.[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-4-35) On January 25 and May 22, 2007, Broussard posted two Gamasutra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamasutra) job ads with small screenshots of Duke Nukem and an enemy, which he later confirmed were real in-game screenshots.[39] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-38)[40] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-39) The team doubled in size within a short timeframe. Among the new hires was project lead Brian Hook, who became the first person to successfully resist Broussard's requests for changes.[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-4-35)
A new game trailer was released on December 19, 2007, the first teaser in more than six years. The video was made by 3D Realms employees as part of holiday festivities. While Broussard maintained the release date would be "when it's done", he added that "you can expect more frequent media releases [and] we have considerable work behind us".[41] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-40) While the Dallas Business Journal "confirmed" a 2008 release date for the game, Broussard later reported that this was based on misunderstanding "off the record" information.[42] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-41) In-game footage of the game appeared in 2008 premiere episode of The Jace Hall Show. Filmed entirely on hand-held cameras but not originally expected to be publicly released,[43] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-42) the video showed host Jason Hall (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Hall_%28producer%29) playing through parts of a single level on a PC at 3D Realms' offices. The footage was confirmed to have been shot 6 months prior to the episode air date and according to Broussard, contained outdated particle and combat effects that had since been replaced.[44] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-43)[45] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-44)[46] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-45) The game did not make an appearance at E3 2008, an event which Miller described as "irrelevant".[47] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-46)
While the game neared completion, the funding began to dry up. Having spent more than $20 million of their own money, Broussard and Miller asked Take-Two for $6 million to complete the game. According to Broussard and Miller, Take-Two initially agreed, but then only offered $2.5 million. Take-Two maintained that they offered $2.5 million up front and another $2.5 million on completion. Broussard rejected the counteroffer, and on May 6, 2009, suspended all development.[36] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-thompson-4-35)
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=7)] DNF team fired and 3D Realms downsized: 2009–2010

3D Realms laid off the DNF staff on May 8, 2009 due to lack of funding, but inside sources claimed it would still operate as a smaller company.[48] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-official_release-47) Development on DNF halted, and its fate was unknown. Publisher Take-Two Interactive, in response, stated that they still held the publishing rights for Duke Nukem Forever, but they were not funding the game.[49] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-48)
On May 7 and May 8, 2009, unreleased screenshots, concept art, pictures of models from the game and a goodbye message from 3D Realms were posted by alleged former employees. Similar leaks occurred on May 9, 10, 11, and 12.[50] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-misc_link_1-49)[51] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-misc_link_2-50) On May 9, 2009, an unofficial Duke Nukem Forever gameplay video was leaked by a user of the Duke4.net forums. According to the user, the video was to serve as a demo reel for animator Bryan Brewer (who had been working on the game with 3D Realms), and Brewer had been waiting for approval from George Broussard, former co-owner of 3D Realms, at the time of the leak.[52] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-51) On May 10, 2009 a second demo reel showing some Duke Nukem Forever animation was also released. The same user of the Duke4.net forums later proceeded to release 28 screenshots and documents outlining the plot of the game. The 28 screenshots were taken from a employees portfolio that was on Linkedin.
On May 14, 2009, Take-Two filed a lawsuit against 3D Realms over their failure to complete Duke Nukem Forever, citing that they paid $12 million to Infogrames (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infogrames) in 2000 to acquire the publishing rights.[53] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-amon-bloomberg-52) 3D Realms argued, however, that they never received that money, as it was a direct agreement between Infogrames and Take-Two.[54] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-53) The lawsuit seemed to be over a contractual breach, but not regarding the $12 million mentioned above.[55] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-lawsuit-54) Take-Two asked for a restraining order and a preliminary injunction, to make 3D Realms keep the Duke Nukem Forever assets intact during proceedings.[56] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-lawsuit2-55) The court denied Take-Two's request for a temporary restraining order.[57] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-56)[58] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-57)
In June 2009, Apogee court filings stated "[3D Realms/Apogee Ltd.] admits that it has continually worked on the development of the DNF for many years, and continues to do so" as well as revealing that development halted on 'Duke Begins'.[59] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-58) In December 2009, Apogee CEO Scott Miller clarified that "we've never said that Duke Nukem Forever has ceased development," explaining "yes, we released the internal team, but that doesn't correlate to the demise of the project."[60] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-59) According to a recent interview with magazine Gamesauce, "3D Realms has laid off the game's internal development team, but still plans to most likely work with external development studios to develop the game."[61] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-60) An unofficial compilation of gameplay footage was also released in December 2009.[62] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-61)
On June 11, 2010, it was announced that 3D Realms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_Realms) and Take-Two (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take-Two) had settled the lawsuit and dismissed it with prejudice (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice_%28legal_procedure%29) on May 14.[63] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-lawsuitSettled-62)[64] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-Settled-63) According to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office), 3D Realms remains the owner of the Duke Nukem intellectual property (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property).
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=8)] Revival

At Penny Arcade Expo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_Arcade_Expo) 2010 on September 3, 2010, it was announced that development of the game is being continued by Gearbox Software (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gearbox_Software) and is going to be released by Take Two Interactive sometime in 2011, one of the developers confirmed in an online interview.[65] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-64) Playable demo booths were held on the first day of the convention. The demo was reported to be a build from 3D Realms and Triptych Games before involvement from Gearbox Software and Piranha Games.
Gearbox president Randy Pitchford (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Pitchford) confirmed his studio was finishing the game since 2009 and that they now own the Duke Nukem IP.[66] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-65) Furthermore Take Two subsidiary 2K Games (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_Games) announced that they have secured the exclusive long-term publishing rights to the game.[67] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever#cite_note-66) Duke Nukem co-creator Allen Blum and his studio Triptych Games are working with Gearbox, as well as independent developer Piranha Games.
Gearbox creative chief officer Brian Martel said the booth was simply set up without making an announcement, making it a surprise for attendees.
[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duke_Nukem_Forever&action=edit&section=9)]

Legendary_Bibo
September 6th, 2010, 02:56 AM
I hope gearbox studios doesn't go out of business if they catch the DNF curse.