PDA

View Full Version : what are the benefits of a clean install vs an upgrade?



mamamia88
April 13th, 2010, 07:55 PM
if you do a clean install with old home partition don't you have to reinstall drivers etc? also wouldn't more settings be kept in tact with an upgrade? i've been using ubuntu since 8.10 but have never actually upgraded before and always started over with each new release but this time i am pretty content with what i have and don't want to lose anything

snowpine
April 13th, 2010, 07:57 PM
Upgrades should work fine. If they don't, it is a bug in the Ubuntu upgrade manager. :)

More info here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes

mamamia88
April 13th, 2010, 07:58 PM
all right i will give it a try this time

WinterRain
April 13th, 2010, 08:00 PM
I've noticed that upgrades are "iffy" at best. You will get the best results by clean installing. I don't even use the same home, as apps change and old configs can screw up the newer app. Considering upgrading can take hours with no guarantees of working well, I'll take a 1 hour clean install anyday.

forrestcupp
April 13th, 2010, 08:03 PM
The benefits are that you get to see the changes they made to the installer, and you get to see how much better and easier things work out of the box.

That's about all. Upgrades work very well, especially compared to what they were like a few years ago.

edit: I guess with a clean install, it's easier to set up a different file system, like ext4.

FuturePilot
April 13th, 2010, 08:05 PM
I always upgrade and I've never had a problem caused specifically by the upgrade. And I've upgrade many machines multiple times.

NightwishFan
April 13th, 2010, 08:22 PM
The Ubuntu up-grader is quite clever. It has contingencies for some common stuff during upgrades.

ZarathustraDK
April 13th, 2010, 08:57 PM
I always clean install, I want to see the installer and how default looks and feels like. :P

swoll1980
April 13th, 2010, 09:05 PM
There aren't any. I've upgraded every version of Ubuntu since 7.04 w/o a hitch. I can't see any reason why someone would want to do a reinstall over an upgrade. It just doesn't make sense to me.

toupeiro
April 13th, 2010, 09:21 PM
I prefer upgrades as I hate having to reconfigure everything after fresh installs. Upgrades preserve almost everything. Evolution's upgrade didn't really work well this time around, so make sure you do a manual backup of your evolution settings prior to your upgrade (and by manual backup, I mean use evolution to create the backup). ..unless you don't use it or have a lot of things to sync with it.

blur xc
April 13th, 2010, 09:24 PM
There aren't any. I've upgraded every version of Ubuntu since 7.04 w/o a hitch. I can't see any reason why someone would want to do a reinstall over an upgrade. It just doesn't make sense to me.

I'm going to upgrade this time around and I'm going the clean install route- As I have been learning Linux, I've been screwing around with tons of junk, installed a lot of stuff I've long since forgotten about, and I'm looking forward to starting out w/ a clean slate this time around, only reinstalling what I really need.

BM

beetleman64
April 13th, 2010, 09:25 PM
I've always performed a clean install, although I performed an upgrade on my test machine and it worked perfectly. That said, since 10.04 is an LTS release I'll probably stick with my old methods.

swoll1980
April 13th, 2010, 09:37 PM
I'm going to upgrade this time around and I'm going the clean install route- As I have been learning Linux, I've been screwing around with tons of junk, installed a lot of stuff I've long since forgotten about, and I'm looking forward to starting out w/ a clean slate this time around, only reinstalling what I really need.

BM

Use computer janitor. People talk crap about it, but I think it's great. Make it easy to find, and delete those programs you forgot about.

sdlynx
April 13th, 2010, 10:03 PM
I usually do a clean install, partly because I have already made a separate partition for /home and figure, why not. I usually save like my fstab (of course some things are different due to formatting of the swap partition), so that I don't have to redo everything. Even my settings are kept, and I feel that with a clean install I can get rid of apps that I never use, saving space (and bootup time).

Also, sometimes when I run upgrades it fails and stuff gets out of control.

madjr
April 13th, 2010, 10:25 PM
with clean install to a new partition you can always revert back

also should be snapier and cleaner, the home and root dirs can have lots of crap over the years

better safe than sorry

also as a bonus you already have a live-cd in case you need it later

lovinglinux
April 13th, 2010, 10:27 PM
I've noticed that upgrades are "iffy" at best. You will get the best results by clean installing. I don't even use the same home, as apps change and old configs can screw up the newer app. Considering upgrading can take hours with no guarantees of working well, I'll take a 1 hour clean install anyday.

+1

I always do clean installs. I have a separate home, but I have already experienced serious issues due to old configuration files. So whenever I do a new clean install I backup all my settings from home, then test if everything is working properly. If not, then I clean my home settings files and manually restore only those folders that I consider most important, like the ones that store encryption keys, passwords and stuff that cannot be re-configured by memory.

WinterRain
April 13th, 2010, 10:29 PM
It just doesn't make sense to me.

And to me, it doesn't make sense to upgrade. To each their own.

Looking around the forums, you will see a lot of "after upgrading, sound/video/wireless no longer works" threads. And, upgrades can take hours, while I can have everything back as it was in a little over an hour with a clean install. (only takes me 4 minutes to install from usb stick) So if only from a time standpoint, why would you upgrade and take a chance that something may break? It just doesn't make sense to me. ;)

swoll1980
April 14th, 2010, 05:34 AM
And to me, it doesn't make sense to upgrade. To each their own.

Looking around the forums, you will see a lot of "after upgrading, sound/video/wireless no longer works" threads. And, upgrades can take hours, while I can have everything back as it was in a little over an hour with a clean install. (only takes me 4 minutes to install from usb stick) So if only from a time standpoint, why would you upgrade and take a chance that something may break? It just doesn't make sense to me. ;)

I clone my hard drive in case I need to restore it. My updates never took that long, or I probably wouldn't upgrade either. It downloads the packages in about 30 minutes, then it spends 30 minutes installing.

jfreak_
April 14th, 2010, 06:46 AM
I have a rather customised system ie the UI is extremely different from the one you guys see regularly, the rgba patch has been implemented in a lot of programs, nautilus has been replaced by nautilus-elementary, many of the boot services have been removed etc etc. you think an upgrade will preserve all these tweaks? I shudder at the thought of doing all these things again.

handy
April 14th, 2010, 09:33 AM
I usually upgrade everyday. Have done on this system for over two years & it is working at least as well as it ever has. :)

Khakilang
April 14th, 2010, 09:48 AM
I have made clean install from 8.10 to 9.94 to 9.10 so maybe I will try the upgrade and see how it goes.