PDA

View Full Version : open source alternatives to PDF ?



zexoc
March 13th, 2010, 08:55 PM
Even though there are much cheaper and free (at least pdf creation) alternatives to Adobe Acrobat, I was wondering if there is a credible alternative to the pdf format itself ?

any thoughts ?

Bachstelze
March 13th, 2010, 08:59 PM
PDF has been an open format for a bit less than two years now (since June 2008 IIRC).

zexoc
March 13th, 2010, 09:01 PM
PDF has been an open format for a bit less than two years now (since June 2008 IIRC).

Oops, didnt read about that one. Thanks for the update Bachestelze !

reyfer
March 13th, 2010, 09:39 PM
Yes, PDF is open, but if you still want to try alternatives, I suggest DjVU. Same quality scans, a lot more compression.


DjVu (pronounced "déjà vu") is a digital document format with advanced compression technology and high performance value. DjVu allows for the distribution on the Internet and on DVD of very high resolution images of scanned documents, digital documents, and photographs. DjVu viewers are available for the web browser, the desktop, and PDA devices.
http://djvu.org/

EDIT: I forgot to mention, both the viewer and the Firefox plugin are in the repos ;)

Tibuda
March 13th, 2010, 09:41 PM
+1 to stick to PDF. It is almost an universal format.

For the Acrobat alternative, try Scribus.

markbuntu
March 14th, 2010, 05:47 AM
Open Office has PDF creation/editing capability now if you are looking for some way to make PDFs. I have not tried it myself. I am not sure but it may be an add on.

juancarlospaco
March 14th, 2010, 06:16 AM
PDFedit, the Ubuntu PDF printer, OpenOffice, Scribus.

Use Evince (avaliable for Windows too) or ePDF Viewer (lighweight)

eumetaxas
March 14th, 2010, 06:39 PM
Don't forget Latex in order to make high quality pdf documents

qyot27
March 14th, 2010, 09:36 PM
I've never tried to use PDFs in Ubuntu, but in Windows I use Sumatra PDF (http://blog.kowalczyk.info/software/sumatrapdf/index.html) (which is GPLv3) - consumes a whole lot fewer resources than Acrobat/Reader. It's rated as Platinum level in Wine. (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=5973)

matthew.ball
March 14th, 2010, 09:51 PM
Don't forget Latex in order to make high quality pdf documents
AUCTeX + Emacs!

Tibuda
March 14th, 2010, 11:06 PM
AUCTeX + Emacs!

Vim LaTeX suite!

shafin
March 15th, 2010, 02:19 AM
I've never tried to use PDFs in Ubuntu, but in Windows I use Sumatra PDF (http://blog.kowalczyk.info/software/sumatrapdf/index.html) (which is GPLv3) - consumes a whole lot fewer resources than Acrobat/Reader. It's rated as Platinum level in Wine. (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=5973)
Evince has become available for windows recently (http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/binaries/win32/evince/2.28/evince-2.28.0.msi), and it works great there too.

Groucho Marxist
March 15th, 2010, 02:23 AM
Even though there are much cheaper and free (at least pdf creation) alternatives to Adobe Acrobat, I was wondering if there is a credible alternative to the pdf format itself ?

Paper.

In fact, I made some a couple of years ago; good times.

Tibuda
March 15th, 2010, 12:12 PM
Evince has become available for windows recently (http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/binaries/win32/evince/2.28/evince-2.28.0.msi), and it works great there too.

Evince can edit PDFs now? That's interesting...

reyfer
March 15th, 2010, 01:08 PM
Sorry, I see all of you are suggesting alternatives to the viewer. I suggested DjVu because I thought the OP was asking about alternatives to the PDF format, not the reader. I may have been mistaken, but....


Even though there are much cheaper and free (at least pdf creation) alternatives to Adobe Acrobat, I was wondering if there is a credible alternative to the pdf format itself ?

any thoughts ?

Is it the reader or the format?

Tibuda
March 15th, 2010, 01:17 PM
Sorry, I see all of you are suggesting alternatives to the viewer. I suggested DjVu because I thought the OP was asking about alternatives to the PDF format, not the reader. I may have been mistaken, but....



Is it the reader or the format?

I think the OP is asking for both the editor (not the reader) and the format.