ben44b
March 1st, 2010, 05:54 AM
Good day,
I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of years and for the most part, I like it. The most frustrating thing over the years has been my run-ins with Intel Graphics Chipset 845G (Brookdale). Since Karmic has come out, this chipset crashes Ubuntu and, months later, this has not been fixed. (See bug #456902). So I had to re-install Ubuntu 9.04.
Thinking this was a Ubuntu problem, I went out and bought a Linux magazine with a Fedora 12 inside. This was after I had downloaded the same distro but couldn't get the install going because of the proverbial chipset. After re-installing 9.04, after I installed Fedora 12 twice, I am now back to a crappier display then the one I had when I decided to "upgrade" to Ubuntu Karmic in November. My patience with the poison brew of Intel and Linux is wearing really, really, really thin.
I cannot afford a new computer nor Windows 7.
My question is: Does Intel care about people who use Linux?
Thanks.
I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of years and for the most part, I like it. The most frustrating thing over the years has been my run-ins with Intel Graphics Chipset 845G (Brookdale). Since Karmic has come out, this chipset crashes Ubuntu and, months later, this has not been fixed. (See bug #456902). So I had to re-install Ubuntu 9.04.
Thinking this was a Ubuntu problem, I went out and bought a Linux magazine with a Fedora 12 inside. This was after I had downloaded the same distro but couldn't get the install going because of the proverbial chipset. After re-installing 9.04, after I installed Fedora 12 twice, I am now back to a crappier display then the one I had when I decided to "upgrade" to Ubuntu Karmic in November. My patience with the poison brew of Intel and Linux is wearing really, really, really thin.
I cannot afford a new computer nor Windows 7.
My question is: Does Intel care about people who use Linux?
Thanks.