handy
January 24th, 2010, 07:05 AM
Only a tiny percentage of organisations involved in the protection of children, are actually for this new imposition on the citizens of Oz' freedom of speech.
It is opposed by nearly all of them, plus the ISPs, & any other thinking person; all say, that this is NOT how to solve the problem & that it will be very easy to sidestep, it is a waste of money.
I think that the true reasons for the imposition of this control on our internet freedom is that it is just a part in the ongoing corporate takeover of the internet by the mega-corps; Rupert Murdoch, Sony, Intel, AT&T, & so on.
The talk of paedophiles & such was just used as the easiest way to try & sell this incredibly expensive system to the population (& it failed). Now we have a small group of people deciding what is & is not good for us to do on the internet!
Whatever happened to the governments actually representing the people who elected them?
http://nocleanfeed.com/
It is opposed by nearly all of them, plus the ISPs, & any other thinking person; all say, that this is NOT how to solve the problem & that it will be very easy to sidestep, it is a waste of money.
I think that the true reasons for the imposition of this control on our internet freedom is that it is just a part in the ongoing corporate takeover of the internet by the mega-corps; Rupert Murdoch, Sony, Intel, AT&T, & so on.
The talk of paedophiles & such was just used as the easiest way to try & sell this incredibly expensive system to the population (& it failed). Now we have a small group of people deciding what is & is not good for us to do on the internet!
Whatever happened to the governments actually representing the people who elected them?
http://nocleanfeed.com/