PDA

View Full Version : Restricted extras vs Medibuntu



armandh
December 12th, 2009, 01:32 PM
Medibuntu is about my only use of the command line
so I thought I would try the restricted extras instead
installed easily but my test dvd did not play
de installed easily too.

Medibuntu's stuff was cut and pasted to the command line and just worked.
the test dvd just played.
in this case I will stick with the successful harder way.

The results....
I finally upgraded the family room media player
I had used an old 933 P-III with a DVI out video card
now a tiny atom/ion itx box & brick power-supply
it even looks like an AV thing
rather than an old computer.

coffeecat
December 12th, 2009, 05:54 PM
I thought I would try the restricted extras instead
installed easily but my test dvd did not play
de installed easily too.

This is not a question of ubuntu-restricted-extras versus Medibuntu. For encrypted DVD playback the two are complementary.

With ubuntu-restricted-extras you would have installed the libdvdread4 library. From the libdvdread4 package description:


libdvdread provides the functionality that is required to access many DVDs. It
parses IFO files, reads NAV-blocks, and performs CSS authentication and
descrambling.

libdvdread currently uses libdl to dynamically probe for libdvdcss at runtime.
If found, libdvdcss will be used to decrypt sections of the DVD as necessary..

Note that it says, "if found, libdvdcss will be used..." The library libdvdcss2 is provided by Medibuntu and without it you will not be able to play encrypted DVDs. In fact, without libdvdread4 you won't be able to play them either. The reason that you could after you "de installed" ubuntu-restricted-extras is that restricted-extras is merely a meta-package. All its dependencies, including libdvdread4, will remain installed even if ubuntu-restricted-extras has been uninstalled.

armandh
December 12th, 2009, 09:22 PM
well if I have to go to medibuntu anyway...

OK. what does medibuntu not have?
I still need flash

I find VLC and medibuntu completes the AV playback
but I could be missing some thing

Ginsu543
December 12th, 2009, 10:37 PM
I think it's more of a both/and rather than either/or, since they both add functionality to Ubuntu. Besides AV-related files, ubuntu-restricted-extras also installs Microsoft TrueType fonts, flash, java, and cabextractor. I always install both on my Ubuntu systems, even on my Dell Vostro A90 with a 4 GB SSD (there's enough room for both).

murderslastcrow
December 13th, 2009, 12:10 AM
I've never used Medibuntu. What does it have to offer?

murderslastcrow
December 13th, 2009, 12:11 AM
Just checked the official site. Doesn't seem too compelling to me, although it certainly did have its place in the olden days.

SuperSonic4
December 13th, 2009, 12:13 AM
essentially non-free codecs and other non-free software useful to ubuntu user

NormanFLinux
December 13th, 2009, 12:14 AM
Medibuntu offers proprietary software and third party codecs for media playback that cannot be shipped with Ubuntu for legal reasons. Ubuntu only offers free software and the minimum proprietary hardware drivers needed to make your computer run. Nothing else. That's why adding it to your Software Sources list will give you a full multimedia desktop.

drawkcab
December 13th, 2009, 05:02 AM
I think it's more of a both/and rather than either/or, since they both add functionality to Ubuntu. Besides AV-related files, ubuntu-restricted-extras also installs Microsoft TrueType fonts, flash, java, and cabextractor. I always install both on my Ubuntu systems, even on my Dell Vostro A90 with a 4 GB SSD (there's enough room for both).

agreed