handy
December 1st, 2009, 01:10 AM
First off, in an attempt to try & allow this thread to live as long as possible, this is NOT a thread about religion, it is about an attitude that some people have with regard to the scientific method & the sciences both soft & hard, in general.
______________
Due to my long term interests in the limitations of science, I have recently taken delivery of an as yet unread book called "The Taboo of Subjectivity" by B. Alan Wallace. Which has inspired the following question.
My question is:
What are your thoughts on the existence of the attitude which some have termed scientistic dogmatism?
To help define the attitude in question I've added some quotes from the back of the book:
In this very important book, Alan Wallace opens our eyes to the scientistic dogmatism that tends to intrude into scientific thought & practice, hampering its effectiveness & blocking its advance into the subtle areas that hold so much promise for new breakthroughs today. It is incisive, comprehensive, & persuasive. A major statement, it should be widely read & seriously considered.
__ Robert A. F. Thurman, Columbia University
_________
Alan Wallace is pointing out a path for extending the scientific method to go beyond the traditional emphasis on the object-pole of experience. He argues convincingly that a future science dealing with experience in its fullness, subject & object & all, can be every bit as scientific & reliable as what we now consider science to be.
__ Piet Hut, Institute for Advanced Study
__________
This book should appeal to many who are dissatisfied with the current status of consciousness & subjectivity in mainstream science, for it offers many fresh insights & trenchant, global criticisms in a field already deluged with 'critiques.'
--William Waldron, Middlebury College
______________
Due to my long term interests in the limitations of science, I have recently taken delivery of an as yet unread book called "The Taboo of Subjectivity" by B. Alan Wallace. Which has inspired the following question.
My question is:
What are your thoughts on the existence of the attitude which some have termed scientistic dogmatism?
To help define the attitude in question I've added some quotes from the back of the book:
In this very important book, Alan Wallace opens our eyes to the scientistic dogmatism that tends to intrude into scientific thought & practice, hampering its effectiveness & blocking its advance into the subtle areas that hold so much promise for new breakthroughs today. It is incisive, comprehensive, & persuasive. A major statement, it should be widely read & seriously considered.
__ Robert A. F. Thurman, Columbia University
_________
Alan Wallace is pointing out a path for extending the scientific method to go beyond the traditional emphasis on the object-pole of experience. He argues convincingly that a future science dealing with experience in its fullness, subject & object & all, can be every bit as scientific & reliable as what we now consider science to be.
__ Piet Hut, Institute for Advanced Study
__________
This book should appeal to many who are dissatisfied with the current status of consciousness & subjectivity in mainstream science, for it offers many fresh insights & trenchant, global criticisms in a field already deluged with 'critiques.'
--William Waldron, Middlebury College