View Full Version : Midnight Commander or EmelFM2 - have you compared?
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 01:24 PM
Hi all
I am looking for a decent file manager that will encourage and promote, efficiency, speed and power.
I am NOT a command line super hero, but I am willing to spend time to learn, as I am doing with vim, IF that investment will be repaid as in the aforementioned criteria.
I'm interested in the opinions of those who preferably, use both; ie midnight commander / emelFM2.
Continued development and support of the apps is also important.
Eisenwinter
September 29th, 2009, 01:28 PM
I don't use "a file manager".
To me, it's much more comfortable to manage my files in the terminal, I also find it much faster.
cd dir<tab>
mv file<tab> /dir<tab>
cp file<tab> ...<tab>
As they say, TAB is king! ;)
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 01:42 PM
I don't use "a file manager".
To me, it's much more comfortable to manage my files in the terminal, I also find it much faster.
cd dir<tab>
mv file<tab> /dir<tab>
cp file<tab> ...<tab>
As they say, TAB is king! ;)
The command line is good for a lot of things but IMO, a file manager, it aint.
Besides, like I said, I'm interested in the views of those that have used either of the FM's I listed above.
juancarlospaco
September 29th, 2009, 03:16 PM
cd dir<tab>
mv file<tab> /dir<tab>
cp file<tab> ...<tab>
As they say, TAB is king! ;)
But i use TAB on Midnight Commander, it have TAB TAB trick too... :)
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 04:08 PM
this thread is getting away from my original post
:confused:
juancarlospaco
September 29th, 2009, 04:28 PM
+1 Midnight
this need to be a poooolll
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 04:33 PM
Poll added :)
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 07:52 PM
I'm leaning towards midnight commander
cariboo
September 29th, 2009, 08:10 PM
I've used mc almost as long as I have been using Linux (Redhat 5.2) . I find it indispensable for managing my server.
Ascenti0n
September 29th, 2009, 08:47 PM
I've used mc almost as long as I have been using Linux (Redhat 5.2) . I find it indispensable for managing my server.
Do you know if MC is in continuous development?
I often use this criteria (rightly or wrongly) as a way to determine the strength and future of the product, though in the case of MC, that seems a mute point.
FuturePilot
September 29th, 2009, 08:52 PM
I like both. Depending on what fits best in the situation. I.E. no gui --> Midnight Commander.
diesch
September 29th, 2009, 09:06 PM
Do you know if MC is in continuous development?
Midnight Command is around for quite a long time now and
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ looks like development is still active.
kk0sse54
September 29th, 2009, 09:10 PM
I prefer mc for the rare times I need a file manager and for the even rarer times when I need a GUI file manager I like pcmanfm. Eventually I'll get around to trying vifm...
PurposeOfReason
September 29th, 2009, 09:14 PM
I like vifm. I have mc set to use vim but it doesn't load my vimrc which makes it useless to me. I don't really use either though, much better with the command line. I only pop up vifm if for some reason something isn't right.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.