kazmo
July 8th, 2009, 03:47 PM
Installing Ubuntu over Windows XP on a windows XP box using the latest ISO of 9.04, downloaded July 4th. The hardware is a Dell, Intel P4 at 1.6Mhz. The box has two IDE drives, one 250Gig, one 40gig.
The 250 gig drive is seen by XP as the C: boot drive, and by the BIOS as Drive 0.
The installation appeared to go smoothly. I choose to load Ubuntu to the C: drive. Upon booting Ubuntu, I received the message:
************************************
ALERT! /host/ubuntu/disks/root.disk does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
BusyBox v1.10.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.10.2-2ubuntu7) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
(initramfs)
************************************
Searching the forums turned up a number of similar problems. The one that sounded most similar involved adding "rootdelay=90".
I tried all of those things. That wasn't it.
Booting back into XP and looking at the drives showed the wubildr, boot.ini and config files had been copied to both the C: and E: drives. The Ubuntu directory was on the c: drive, which is what I expected.
So reboot back to Ubuntu. At the Busybox shell, I tried to find a directory that existed on the C: drive. Nothing found. I thend tried a find on a files that existed only on the E: drive, and low and behold, there it is. So Ubuntu was looking for the root.disk on a drive different from the one specified to WUBI in the install process.
I was luck enough to have allocated only 20gb to Ubuntu during the install. Since the E: drive had enough space available, I copoed the Ununtu directory over from C: to E:.
Sure enough, Ubuntu booted after that change. After plinking around and creating a couple of test files, I dropped Linux and re-booted XP. The root.disk on the E: drive had been updated, the root.disk on C: still had the date/time stamp from the install.
Question:
1) Is this a known issue? It sounds similar to other problems, but those solutions did not resolve the issue.
2) I figure I could pull the plug on the E: drive and re-install. Is there another easier fix? It dual boots fine, I'd just as soon not mess up the XP install.
3) If it sounds like a new bug, what is SOP for reporting it? There's so much stuff to read, I must be searching for the wrong things.
The 250 gig drive is seen by XP as the C: boot drive, and by the BIOS as Drive 0.
The installation appeared to go smoothly. I choose to load Ubuntu to the C: drive. Upon booting Ubuntu, I received the message:
************************************
ALERT! /host/ubuntu/disks/root.disk does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
BusyBox v1.10.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.10.2-2ubuntu7) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
(initramfs)
************************************
Searching the forums turned up a number of similar problems. The one that sounded most similar involved adding "rootdelay=90".
I tried all of those things. That wasn't it.
Booting back into XP and looking at the drives showed the wubildr, boot.ini and config files had been copied to both the C: and E: drives. The Ubuntu directory was on the c: drive, which is what I expected.
So reboot back to Ubuntu. At the Busybox shell, I tried to find a directory that existed on the C: drive. Nothing found. I thend tried a find on a files that existed only on the E: drive, and low and behold, there it is. So Ubuntu was looking for the root.disk on a drive different from the one specified to WUBI in the install process.
I was luck enough to have allocated only 20gb to Ubuntu during the install. Since the E: drive had enough space available, I copoed the Ununtu directory over from C: to E:.
Sure enough, Ubuntu booted after that change. After plinking around and creating a couple of test files, I dropped Linux and re-booted XP. The root.disk on the E: drive had been updated, the root.disk on C: still had the date/time stamp from the install.
Question:
1) Is this a known issue? It sounds similar to other problems, but those solutions did not resolve the issue.
2) I figure I could pull the plug on the E: drive and re-install. Is there another easier fix? It dual boots fine, I'd just as soon not mess up the XP install.
3) If it sounds like a new bug, what is SOP for reporting it? There's so much stuff to read, I must be searching for the wrong things.