PDA

View Full Version : Wasting a DVD-R



LightB
May 6th, 2009, 04:53 PM
Since I had nothing else to do, I went ahead and installed [Windows 7 RC] aka Vista SP3 RC. This is how it went.

First I tried installing it on a really old spare hard drive. That didn't work. The installer first detected it, then when it reached 100% of "expanding archives" or something like that, it vanished off the system. The drive vanished. I don't know if it died now by coincidence after years working on an old PC, or if there is some minimum size for the installation that it didn't match, who knows, that's conjecture. I haven't bothered to check the drive again.

Ok, I grabbed another old drive of 30GB and it did install there. Going through the process, the fact that it's Vista really does come through.

Once everything was done and I was in the desktop, I just think it's another flavor of the Vista fugliness (http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/9572/74700204.jpg). At least mode 1400x1050 was working, which is nice. The panel is a mix of static icons that double as 'window items' ala OSX, with a mix of asinine windows list (http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/2151/37761038.jpg).

Great, some updates have been applied (http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6413/10186873.jpg). Same old "restart for everything" Windows stupidity. Not shocked, just saying.

At least the latest and greatest IE8 (http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/7126/79236692.jpg) is included. If you look around the status bar, Protected Mode is on! Get this right away, this is the safest thing ever created in existence. Well since I would be one of those self-destructive types, I went ahead and tried out installing Firefox instead. At least it did install, but it's slow as always compared to the safe and great IE8. You can be sure WoW nerds will not and should not put up with slow loading clan blogs on Firefox, which is why it's fail and IE wins by default. But I digress.

Then it was time to restart and the resolution was screwed. I know Windows 7 'is awesome', but I just can't keep up with it's enlightened, new-age, widescreen resolution recommendations (http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/9629/95916163.jpg) on a 4:3 monitor. As you can see, my desired resolution had disappeared. To be fair, it's probably ATI's fault for failing to release proper drivers for this latest MS buttbaby, but oh well, resolution is gone regardless. 1280x960 should be good enough according to the updates (http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/6196/44621173.jpg).

Well, that was fun. In closing, I thought it had some really nice wallpapers and a spiff little animation during the slow startup with 4 lights flying together to form a glowing Windows icon. If that's not worth the same performance on faster hardware for several hundred $, I don't know what is.

pwnst*r
May 6th, 2009, 04:58 PM
k.

joey-elijah
May 6th, 2009, 05:08 PM
Haha fair enough review. I'm think Windows 7 is great.. for a windows release. Though all of the praise it's getting because it doesn't crash, is stable, works with hardware is a bit moot considering an operating system should do those things off the bat, not proclaim them "features".

LightB
May 6th, 2009, 05:13 PM
Haha fair enough review. I'm think Windows 7 is great.. for a windows release. Though all of the praise it's getting because it doesn't crash, is stable, works with hardware is a bit moot considering an operating system should do those things off the bat, not proclaim them "features".

I think it's getting "praise" because MS microscopically yielded to the pressure to not try artificially peddling hardware. In other words, because it's not Vista. But it sort of still is. But now people can pretend like it's not with a new name which makes it "officially not Vista". That, and after being on Linux, etc, this just feels like a restrictive distro that's been rooted.

NightwishFan
May 6th, 2009, 05:42 PM
I love the sarcasm. :KS

From your screenshots.. I really think it is not as well done as I thought, so I am relieved. I am all for Windows actually working so that my personal information such as medical will eventually be stored on a reasonably reliable system. I cringe when my dentist inputs all this information in some ancient Xp program.

Yet I do not want them so succeed. Not out of spite, it is just if Windows is finally good, Linux will begin to be spit upon... I would like a bit more adoption so they finally give us official support. The only hardware I know that even mentions Linux are flash drives. And they tend to say things like "advanced features such as so and so will not be available on Linux". Which is untrue.

Well KDE4 is great, and GNOME 3 may surprise us all. We shall see.