PDA

View Full Version : [ubuntu] The Jackalope eats my desktop effects!



calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 01:38 PM
Hello!

This might be a bit minor, but when I upgraded to Jaunty, I noticed that the "wobbly windows" effect was not enabled, so I went in to the Appearance settings, and when I clicked the "Extra" effects setting, an error box pops up saying that desktop effects could not be enabled.

Please help me - I miss the effects already! :mad: :lol:

loklaan
April 25th, 2009, 02:02 PM
Have you installed propriety video drivers? You need them to run compiz, at least I did

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 02:12 PM
I have not installed proprietary drivers.

The desktop effects were working fine on Intrepid :confused:

loklaan
April 25th, 2009, 02:19 PM
You had probably looked away when the drivers were being installed on Ibex? Haha idk. Look in System > Administration > Hardware Drivers to see what drivers you can download. If you already have a driver magically installed, well... :s

What graphics card do you have btw?

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 02:29 PM
I don't know how to get info about my graphics card although i have a pretty good guess that you put the following into a terminal:


lspci

solidsnake204
April 25th, 2009, 02:42 PM
You can install Sysinfo to get information about your system:

sudo apt-get install sysinfo

You can find it in your System Tools sub-menu.

Launch Sysinfo then goto Hardware.
There's a dropdown box on the top right, select Graphic Card.

loklaan
April 25th, 2009, 02:48 PM
^ hazza, though lspci does will enough, mine for example in the lspci print-off:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 9500M GS (rev a1)

Did you look in System > Administration > Hardware Drivers calvinps?

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 02:53 PM
^ hazza, though lspci does will enough, mine for example in the lspci print-off:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 9500M GS (rev a1)Did you look in System > Administration > Hardware Drivers calvinps?

I did but all there is is my alternate wifi driver (MadWIFI) on the list, and no mention of proprietary graphics drivers

loklaan
April 25th, 2009, 02:59 PM
Ah ok, and what is your graphics card? (VGA controller)

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 03:09 PM
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

The VGA-compatible controller is also listed on sysinfo.

Hope this helps :D

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 03:48 PM
bump :P

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 04:08 PM
Go to: System > Preferences > Appearance. Click the "Visual Effects" tab. See if you can enable any of those options. Those might be the limit to what your system can handle as you seem to have an integrated graphics chip.

GolemdX
April 25th, 2009, 04:15 PM
In his first post, he said he already tried that and it failed, but it was working fine in Inteprid.

Having the same problem with 2 of my computers. Here's info on 1:


VGA compatible controller
Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
Subsystem: Dell Device 019d

Nothing in Hardware Drivers, also was working on Inteprid.

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 04:15 PM
Go to: System > Preferences > Appearance. Click the "Visual Effects" tab. See if you can enable any of those options. Those might be the limit to what your system can handle as you seem to have an integrated graphics chip.

I can't enable any of these options.

GolemdX
April 25th, 2009, 04:17 PM
Having an integrated graphics chip doesn't really put very many limitations when it comes to ubuntu, although with Windows it can cause problems.

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 04:24 PM
It all depends on the capabilities and compatibility of the graphics chip. Intel in general aren't that great for graphics. Try and run a lot of heavy eye candy and the system will get bogged down.

The Nvidia card in my Dell XPS M1330n starts to suffer with 4 virtual desktops. Especially if I enable the cube effects.

I'm wondering how much of the effects were enabled last time around. Was the desktop cube enabled?

calvinps
April 25th, 2009, 04:29 PM
I don't run Compiz on my laptop.

I don't see the point on having multiple workspaces. Its the desktop effects i'm concerned about

D1ZZ4ZZT3R
April 25th, 2009, 04:29 PM
i'm not trying to steal this thread but, it's related and, no body has answered my thread in three days so...

i have an nvidia card, and everytime i turn the comp on, my resolution gets set too high. i have to manually set it back using my graphic driver vendors tool (which i never had to use in intrepid or hardy). using that, i go to x server display configuration, change my resolution, and it works fine (until i turn comp back on). i also attempt to save to x configuration file (with merge with existing file checked) but, it tells me "unable to create new x config backup file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'.


anyone?

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 04:29 PM
Okay what you need to do is go and read the following.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/IntelPerformance
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReinhardTartler/X/RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 04:32 PM
It's Compiz that provides the wobble in your wobbly windows.

GolemdX
April 25th, 2009, 05:02 PM
For me, I had Wobbly Windows, Desktop Cube, Rotate Cube, 3D Windows, Reflection and Deformation, Paint fire on Screen, and other desktop effects that I'm forgetting.

My Acer Aspire One netbook (which also has an intel integrated card) had:
Desktop Cube, Rotate Cube, 3D Windows, Reflection and Deformation (With deformation disabled), Paint Fire on Screen, the one that made it rain, and other desktop effects that I'm forgetting.

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 05:08 PM
Have you tried editing the file manually D1ZZ?


# xorg.conf (X.Org X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the xorg.conf manual page.
# (Type "man xorg.conf" at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg
# package.
#
# Note that some configuration settings that could be done previously
# in this file, now are automatically configured by the server and settings
# here are ignored.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following command:
# sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg

Section "Device"
Identifier "Configured Video Device"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Configured Monitor"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Monitor "Configured Monitor"
Device "Configured Video Device"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1024x768"
EndSubSection
EndSection

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 05:10 PM
For me, I had Wobbly Windows, Desktop Cube, Rotate Cube, 3D Windows, Reflection and Deformation, Paint fire on Screen, and other desktop effects that I'm forgetting.

My Acer Aspire One netbook (which also has an intel integrated card) had:
Desktop Cube, Rotate Cube, 3D Windows, Reflection and Deformation (With deformation disabled), Paint Fire on Screen, the one that made it rain, and other desktop effects that I'm forgetting.

So which revision of which Intel integrated graphics chip do you have?

D1ZZ4ZZT3R
April 25th, 2009, 05:18 PM
i did, aikiwolfie but, i didn't have permission, and it wouldn't let me change permission adn, i don't know how : /

Seq
April 25th, 2009, 05:30 PM
Alright guys, as to the original issue in the thread, desktop effects is blacklisted for several Intel cards currently in jaunty. Please read the release notes (http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904#Display%20freezes%20with%20Intel%20graphics%20 cards) for a bit more information.

The compiz website has information on the Blacklist (http://wiki.compiz-fusion.org/Hardware/Blacklist) (at least stuff that gets blacklisted upstream). At the bottom of that page is information on how to skip the blacklist check. Note that this MAY cause the stability problems that prompted the blacklist in the first place.

That said, I'm running jaunty with desktop effects enabled on a 965 (x3100) without any issues. I'm also running UXA instead of EXA as well, which apparently causes stability issues for some right there.

GolemdX
April 25th, 2009, 05:35 PM
So which revision of which Intel integrated graphics chip do you have?

I posted it earlier in this topic... This is the first computer, not the netbook.


VGA compatible controller
Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
Subsystem: Dell Device 019d

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 06:39 PM
i did, aikiwolfie but, i didn't have permission, and it wouldn't let me change permission adn, i don't know how : /

Press Alt+F2 or open a terminal windows and type the following:

gksudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Enter your password when asked and you should now have permission.

GolemdX
April 25th, 2009, 08:03 PM
Press Alt+F2 or open a terminal windows and type the following:

gksudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Enter your password when asked and you should now have permission.

Does this apply to me too, or just him. If it does apply to me, what should I edit?

aikiwolfie
April 25th, 2009, 09:21 PM
No. If you're having the same issue as the original poster then you should look at the same links I gave him earlier.

GolemdX
April 26th, 2009, 01:08 AM
Installing the 2.4 driver fixed it, after reboot everything was back to normal!

D1ZZ4ZZT3R
April 26th, 2009, 09:24 AM
Press Alt+F2 or open a terminal windows and type the following:

gksudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.confEnter your password when asked and you should now have permission.


well, thanks aikiwolfie but, i did that, pasted into it (after clearing what was there) what i was given in the preview of what the nvidia config tool was attempting to save with out success, restarted and it didn't work. i then did it again with what you provided earlier, changing the resolution to what i actually wanted, restarted and, it worked but, it doesn't use the graphics card anymore (no more effects).

i'm sure the fault is mine, i'm tired of trying, i'm tired and hungry. thank you anyway, i'll probably try again later with more attention to detail at a later date.

telmac
April 26th, 2009, 09:28 AM
naughty naughty jackalope!

aikiwolfie
April 26th, 2009, 11:30 AM
well, thanks aikiwolfie but, i did that, pasted into it (after clearing what was there) what i was given in the preview of what the nvidia config tool was attempting to save with out success, restarted and it didn't work. i then did it again with what you provided earlier, changing the resolution to what i actually wanted, restarted and, it worked but, it doesn't use the graphics card anymore (no more effects).

i'm sure the fault is mine, i'm tired of trying, i'm tired and hungry. thank you anyway, i'll probably try again later with more attention to detail at a later date.

Sorry it didn't work. Try reinstalling the nvidia driver. Then just add the section for the resolutions to what is already there.

D1ZZ4ZZT3R
April 26th, 2009, 05:18 PM
Sorry it didn't work. Try reinstalling the nvidia driver. Then just add the section for the resolutions to what is already there.


well, i think i know what happened. i looked at the box of text you provided and it seems there's no specific information included (which there wouldn't be, seeing as you don't know my personal specs). like i said, i was tired. i'll just go in and add that stuff and see what happens.

first breakfast.

how's the OP's problem coming along? i almost forgot this wasn't my thread. hey, aikiwolfie, would you mind taking a look at this thread for me?

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1134582

it's got this problem and one more... you seem helpful and like you know what you're doing. also, i don't want to take away from this threads OP's problem.

aikiwolfie
April 26th, 2009, 05:45 PM
Actually I took that file from a virtual machine. Probably not the best idea. But then again my actual xorg.conf file doesn't look much different. As far as I know the xorg development guys are trying to get away from using that config file for some reason. Which has left a lot of people with display issues.

My actual xorg.conf file. I don't use the resolution settings. But I do need the BusID option because I have two graphics cards and the new xorg doesn't select a default. Like DOH!

# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg
# package.
#
# Note that some configuration settings that could be done previously
# in this file, now are automatically configured by the server and settings
# here are ignored.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following command:
# sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg

Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Configured Monitor"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Monitor "Configured Monitor"
Device "Configured Video Device"
DefaultDepth 24
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load "glx"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier "Configured Video Device"
BusID "01:00:00"
Driver "nvidia"
Option "NoLogo" "True"
EndSection

calvinps
April 27th, 2009, 04:45 PM
Just a small question:

The page says that I need to restart X after the driver was installed. Does that mean restarting the computer? if not, what do I have to do?

aikiwolfie
April 27th, 2009, 04:58 PM
Normally logging out and back in again is enough. But restarting the whole PC will have the same effect.

calvinps
April 27th, 2009, 05:05 PM
Normally logging out and back in again is enough. But restarting the whole PC will have the same effect.

Ok. I restarted my box when I installed the drivers, but I still get this "can't enable desktop effects" thingy

I really want my FX back!!! :lol:

calvinps
April 28th, 2009, 07:04 AM
bump

Seq
April 28th, 2009, 02:01 PM
Just a small question:

The page says that I need to restart X after the driver was installed. Does that mean restarting the computer? if not, what do I have to do?

Which drivers did you install, calvinps?

Note that if you're enabling desktop effects on an Intel 965 (like you indicated you had in the earlier) that you are probably blacklisted. I had already posted a link to a workaround, but it may cause stability problems (which is why it is blacklisted until the Ubuntu devs can push an intel driver that works).

Edit: If the card is blacklisted (likely) then changing the driver won't unblacklist it -- though it might solve the problems that caused the blacklist in the first place. You will have to tell compiz (which is what provides desktop effects) to ignore the blacklist.

EDIT: a bit more info

calvinps
April 28th, 2009, 04:58 PM
Which drivers did you install, calvinps?

Note that if you're enabling desktop effects on an Intel 965 (like you indicated you had in the earlier) that you are probably blacklisted. I had already posted a link to a workaround, but it may cause stability problems (which is why it is blacklisted until the Ubuntu devs can push an intel driver that works).

Edit: If the card is blacklisted (likely) then changing the driver won't unblacklist it -- though it might solve the problems that caused the blacklist in the first place. You will have to tell compiz (which is what provides desktop effects) to ignore the blacklist.

EDIT: a bit more info

I reverted the Intel driver to the version used in intrepid.

Speaking of blacklists, I dealt with one when I had issues with wi-fi on Intrepid, but now we're probably having to deal with them again here; this time with graphics issues. :/

Where could the blacklists be? I have a good guess that they could be in /etc/modules or something.

Seq
April 28th, 2009, 05:22 PM
I reverted the Intel driver to the version used in intrepid.

Speaking of blacklists, I dealt with one when I had issues with wi-fi on Intrepid, but now we're probably having to deal with them again here; this time with graphics issues. :/

Similar principle, but different blacklist. In this case it's a Compiz built-in blacklist (known problems running compiz on specific hardware), not a kernel module blacklist (known problems with driver). Your driver is loaded (no kernel blacklist), it's just Compiz has a list of cards that are known to cause problems. These problems are often due to the driver, but compiz has no idea what driver version will resolve an issue, so it just blocks the card (based on hardware IDs) until further notice. If it recognizes your card from this list it gracefully quits (thus reverting to metacity) rather than potentially crashing X (or causing whatever issues caused the card to appear on the blacklist).

Unfortunately you get the less than helpful "Unable to start" message that could mean one of 100 things...


Where could the blacklists be? I have a good guess that they could be in /etc/modules or something.

My post earlier in the thread had the relavant links to the compiz website on how to disable the compiz blocklist (http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7144022&postcount=25).

IsolatedSheep
October 17th, 2009, 02:38 PM
Hello, I'm new to ubuntu. i installed Jaunty Jackalope, but could not get the desktop effect to work, hope you can help me with this. Here's my system info:


andi@andi-laptop:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS780M/RS780MN [Radeon HD 3200 Graphics]
andi@andi-laptop:~$ compiz
Checking for Xgl: not present.
xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log
Detected PCI ID for VGA:
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: not present.
Trying again with indirect rendering:
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present.
Checking for non power of two support: present.
Checking for Composite extension: present.
Checking screen 1Comparing resolution (1366x768) to maximum 3D texture size (2048): Passed.
Checking for Software Rasterizer: present.
Software rasterizer detected, abortingaborting and using fallback: /usr/bin/metacity
And the terminal stop after the line that has "/usr/bin/metacity", it does not prompt for new command. If i try to close the terminal an error dialog shows up warning me about a process still running. I don't know why this happen, help you can answer this aswell.

Thanks in advance.. :D