nightrider.36
February 27th, 2009, 06:01 PM
Hello all,
I installed GNOME, KDE and XFCE environments in seperate partitions of my hard drive. I don't know if I needed to do that but that's how little I understand the various environments.
I'm running 8.10 on an Alienware Area-51 M5550 w/4GB RAM.
GNOME:
My default installation - SDA-1. Everything works great. Nvidia drivers work(with some effort), sound works, the system is snappy and I have no complaints. Hibernate and Sleep are twitchy but they were with Windows as well.
KDE:
Looks cooler than GNOME but bluetooth doesn't work, sound doesn't work. I don't understand their installer as I got used to the star rating in GNOME's. Things just seem more difficult to find. I know the hardware works because it works using GNOME and XFCE Yet KDE is the environment of choice if you like to customize. What gives? What am I doing wrong with KDE? I guess I don't really understand how they work.
XFCE:
Beautiful. Like GNOME, everything works perfectly and faster than the previous two environments.
So, what's the difference? More things seem to work on my laptop better and faster using GNOME than KDE. Xfce worked nicely as well, better than KDE.
Why do some users prefer one environment over the other?
I installed GNOME, KDE and XFCE environments in seperate partitions of my hard drive. I don't know if I needed to do that but that's how little I understand the various environments.
I'm running 8.10 on an Alienware Area-51 M5550 w/4GB RAM.
GNOME:
My default installation - SDA-1. Everything works great. Nvidia drivers work(with some effort), sound works, the system is snappy and I have no complaints. Hibernate and Sleep are twitchy but they were with Windows as well.
KDE:
Looks cooler than GNOME but bluetooth doesn't work, sound doesn't work. I don't understand their installer as I got used to the star rating in GNOME's. Things just seem more difficult to find. I know the hardware works because it works using GNOME and XFCE Yet KDE is the environment of choice if you like to customize. What gives? What am I doing wrong with KDE? I guess I don't really understand how they work.
XFCE:
Beautiful. Like GNOME, everything works perfectly and faster than the previous two environments.
So, what's the difference? More things seem to work on my laptop better and faster using GNOME than KDE. Xfce worked nicely as well, better than KDE.
Why do some users prefer one environment over the other?