PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft works hard for Linux users to watch inauguration via Moonlight & Mono



Grant A.
January 20th, 2009, 11:49 PM
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/20/134228

This is rather nice of them. This shows that not only do they support Mono, but this is proof the Novell deal is working since Novell leads the Mono project and Microsoft is contractually required to help out.

Although, could this be a new page for Microsoft?

jenkinbr
January 21st, 2009, 12:10 AM
WHOA!

Microsoft is required to contribute to Open Source Software?

Whether this is a new page for Microsoft, I don't know. Time will tell what MS does with this....

smartboyathome
January 21st, 2009, 01:27 AM
WHOA!

Microsoft is required to contribute to Open Source Software?

Whether this is a new page for Microsoft, I don't know. Time will tell what MS does with this....

They are because the European Union declared them a monopoly and Microsoft doesn't want to go to court with the EU.

Grant A.
January 21st, 2009, 01:48 AM
They are because the European Union declared them a monopoly and Microsoft doesn't want to go to court with the EU.

As a provision of the Microsoft-Novell deal, not only does it grant patent immunity to Novell, but it also requires Microsoft to contribute to open source projects.

I personally declare this a small victory for cooperation between Microsoft and the Linux community. Hopefully Microsoft will look towards licensing some major products as open source. :popcorn:

speedwell68
January 21st, 2009, 02:38 AM
As a provision of the Microsoft-Novell deal, not only does it grant patent immunity to Novell, but it also requires Microsoft to contribute to open source projects.

I personally declare this a small victory for cooperation between Microsoft and the Linux community. Hopefully Microsoft will look towards licensing some major products as open source. :popcorn:

Yeah, if they could release the source code for the next release of Office, that would be just dandy. I know OpenOffice is good, but MS Office is better. A bit bloaty but better.

Thirtysixway
January 21st, 2009, 02:42 AM
Releasing the source of office would never happen. That's like their next most popular product after windows. It brings in so much money for microsoft.

speedwell68
January 21st, 2009, 02:43 AM
Releasing the source of office would never happen. That's like their next most popular product after windows. It brings in so much money for microsoft.

I believe I was being ironic.:D

directhex
January 21st, 2009, 12:21 PM
As a provision of the Microsoft-Novell deal, not only does it grant patent immunity to Novell, but it also requires Microsoft to contribute to open source projects.

I personally declare this a small victory for cooperation between Microsoft and the Linux community. Hopefully Microsoft will look towards licensing some major products as open source. :popcorn:

Novell do not have patent immunity from Microsoft, nor vice versa.

Novell/MS customers do. It's an important distinction, as it still means Novell can sue MS for patent infringement (and vice versa) should they want to

Dragonbite
January 21st, 2009, 02:47 PM
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/20/134228

This is rather nice of them. This shows that not only do they support Mono, but this is proof the Novell deal is working since Novell leads the Mono project and Microsoft is contractually required to help out.

Although, could this be a new page for Microsoft?

The MS/Novell deal is for interoperability and virtualization. Mono is not specified in there and Microsoft has not helped as much with Mono as it has with Moonlight. While Moonlight is based on Mono it isn't the same thing as Mono.

The Patent protection (or "I promise not to sue if you promise not to sue") is for customers and (individual) developers of Novell products (which is the way Mono and Moonlight developers are protected, though Mono and Moonlight themselves are not).

Honestly, I don't think MS really gives a darn about the EU calling it a Monopoly. Looks like a stuffy group trying to "stick it to the man" than anything else.

bobbob1016
January 21st, 2009, 02:50 PM
No x86_64bit Ubuntu support though.

directhex
January 21st, 2009, 02:55 PM
No x86_64bit Ubuntu support though.

Really?

Really?

REALLY?


jms@osc-franzibald:~$ dpkg -l \*moon\* | grep ^ii
ii libmoon 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - unstable runtime library
ii moonlight-plugin-core 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - plugin core components
ii moonlight-plugin-mozilla 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - Xulrunner 1.9 plugin

Worked fine for me for watching the inauguration. Unlike Adobe Flash, Moonlight is multi-platform, including things like PowerPC

jrusso2
January 21st, 2009, 04:11 PM
I never did get it working for the inauguration which I ended up using Flash. Moonlight does work however on some demo sites I found by searching.

sydbat
January 21st, 2009, 04:19 PM
Does it work side-by-side with Flash? Or does one have to be removed for the other to work?

fluxlizard
January 21st, 2009, 04:31 PM
Does this mean I can watch it now on Netflix sooner?

directhex
January 21st, 2009, 04:37 PM
Does it work side-by-side with Flash? Or does one have to be removed for the other to work?

They're different plugins, for different purposes. They're no more incompatible than, say, having Java and Flash support at the same time. In fact, some sites use both SL and Flash at the same time


Does this mean I can watch it now on Netflix sooner?

Netflix requires Silverlight 2.0, due to DRM (1.0 does not support DRM), and Moonlight only offers Silverlight 1.0 support right now.

eragon100
January 21st, 2009, 04:53 PM
No x86_64bit Ubuntu support though.

CRAP I watched the stream perfectly on 64-bit ubuntu, there is a one-mouse-click install 64-bit version of the plugin. And I read multiple other people saying it works fine on their 64-bit ubuntu in the other thread about this.

I will repeat what I said there: way to go MS. Kudos to you. Seriously! :popcorn: :KS

sydbat
January 21st, 2009, 05:19 PM
I took the plunge and installed it for testing purposes...but every site I have checked (so far) wants me to install other 'Microsoft codecs' to view content. I cancel the popup and cannot view anything. Suggestions??

directhex
January 21st, 2009, 05:49 PM
I took the plunge and installed it for testing purposes...but every site I have checked (so far) wants me to install other 'Microsoft codecs' to view content. I cancel the popup and cannot view anything. Suggestions??

Use packages which are compiled against FFmpeg?

timcredible
January 21st, 2009, 08:16 PM
so what sites does this work on? i tried a few that i couldn't use before like abc.com, cwtv.com, they still don't work. so, microsoft went and made a linux version of their video player, but all sites still specifically look for and deny linux? what good is this?

directhex
January 21st, 2009, 08:55 PM
so what sites does this work on? i tried a few that i couldn't use before like abc.com, cwtv.com, they still don't work. so, microsoft went and made a linux version of their video player, but all sites still specifically look for and deny linux? what good is this?

Sites which look for Silverlight 2.0 won't work, as Moonlight doesn't yet support SL2.

bobbob1016
January 22nd, 2009, 03:29 PM
Really?

Really?

REALLY?


jms@osc-franzibald:~$ dpkg -l \*moon\* | grep ^ii
ii libmoon 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - unstable runtime library
ii moonlight-plugin-core 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - plugin core components
ii moonlight-plugin-mozilla 1.0-1~dhx2 Free Software clone of Silverlight 1.0 - Xulrunner 1.9 plugin

Worked fine for me for watching the inauguration. Unlike Adobe Flash, Moonlight is multi-platform, including things like PowerPC

You're right, I mean how could I have missed it saying Ubuntu x86_64 on their support page http://mono-project.com/MoonlightSupportedPlatforms

x86-64 (64 bit) SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 yes yes
openSUSE 11.0 yes

Nothing about 64bit Ubuntu...

Edit: No OFFICIAL support, is that better?

sydbat
January 22nd, 2009, 04:03 PM
Aaaaand...I just finished uninstalling it. It kept crashing FF. Not sure why, but it is the only add-on I have installed in months and FF was working perfectly beforehand. Coincidence?