racoq
January 12th, 2009, 09:20 PM
Interesting interview given by GetDeb Founder, Joćo Pinto:
Interview in English (http://translate.google.pt/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pplware.com%2F2009%2F 01%2F12%2Fentrevista-a-joao-pinto-getdeb%2F&sl=pt&tl=en&hl=pt-PT&ie=UTF-8)
Interview in Portuguese (http://www.pplware.com/2009/01/12/entrevista-a-joao-pinto-getdeb/)
I quote an interesting view:
(...) The Ubuntu repositories in their offers thousands of programs easily installable, although repositories aim at maximum stability, ie, once leaving a final version of Ubuntu, the programs available for this version no longer be updated, are only made security fixes or serious defects. Although the objective is the maintenance of a system as stable as possible, ie where there is no possibility of introducing new problems, this policy ultimately limit many people
Do you think that GetDeb is important for the end user, and adresses the limitation of the outdated software on ubuntu repositories?
Interview in English (http://translate.google.pt/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pplware.com%2F2009%2F 01%2F12%2Fentrevista-a-joao-pinto-getdeb%2F&sl=pt&tl=en&hl=pt-PT&ie=UTF-8)
Interview in Portuguese (http://www.pplware.com/2009/01/12/entrevista-a-joao-pinto-getdeb/)
I quote an interesting view:
(...) The Ubuntu repositories in their offers thousands of programs easily installable, although repositories aim at maximum stability, ie, once leaving a final version of Ubuntu, the programs available for this version no longer be updated, are only made security fixes or serious defects. Although the objective is the maintenance of a system as stable as possible, ie where there is no possibility of introducing new problems, this policy ultimately limit many people
Do you think that GetDeb is important for the end user, and adresses the limitation of the outdated software on ubuntu repositories?