How does this relate to a new browser about to be published by Google?
How does this relate to a new browser about to be published by Google?
Worked for most everyone I've ever introduced to Linux, well over two dozen people over a wide range of hardware, I'd say it's rather conclusive.
Though I will admit if you only use wireless (Which is evil anyways, I always go wired if I can help it.) then you're more likely to not get your hardware working right off the bat because of it.
And I said MOST hardware, not all. Try installing NON-OEM Windows and Ubuntu on the same machine, you might be surprised how far BEHIND Windows is on hardware support out of the box.
Provided you run to their websites (IF networking is functional.) and download their drivers. Again, everyone I've converted to Linux didn't have to do that when they installed Ubuntu, the drivers were all available.
Sure, the hardware manufacturers aren't making drivers themselves, but I find that out of the box everything working beats 5 hours of hunting for drivers.
everyone else agrees with me at my school, and my profs, and most people in this forum whom ive talked to, except a few. I thought it was common knowledge that Microsoft is great with devices, but lacks stability, and Linux was great with stability but lacked compatibility.
I did get wireless to work on my laptop only to have a kernel update kill the wireless and add/remove programs. I was able to fix it some 10 minutes later. But I am not sure how a Windows user trying out Ubuntu for just a few weeks would deal with updates killing key features.
Regarding Chrome, I see no use for it. I been using Firefox for a few years already on my Windows machines and now of course on Ubuntu.
Bookmarks