Re: multiple problems in firefox 3.0.2 (not sure if they are related)
Maybe it isn't the best place to do that, but...
1) Fx3 uses LESS resources than Fx2. Less a lot, at least for me. Moreover, this is Fx2 which is slow and resource-demanding
2) I haven't seen any problems with Flash and Java
3) It has a lot of useful features, and one of the most useful is the Awesomebar. I cannot live without it now
4) Fx 3.1 is about to be released within a month. It is how should Fx 3.0 look like, but developers didn't manage to do everything on time. You can download a new version and try it
Why do I say it? I know there are people that prefer Fx2 to Fx3. But: I consider Fx3 A LOT better than Fx2, and a lot people does the same. So don't post things like "Fx3 is a crap", since there are a lot of people than don't agree with You; besides, You're not helping this way.
EOT.
And I agree with CatKiller, in most cases just renaming .mozilla folder works.
Michał Gołębiowski
Dell Latitude E6500: P8600 | Intel GMA 4500MHD | 15,4'' 1440x900 LED (matte) | 4GiB DDR2 | 233 GiB HDD 7200 rpm (with Free Fall Sensor).
Jabber ID: mgol /at/ jabster.pl - let me write in within my profile details, please!
Bookmarks