Re: How to install ubuntu on USB drive and carry entire computing system in pocket?
Hello shrinathk87,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful warning.
I agree with you that for everyday use it's better to install Ubuntu in a hard disk drive inside a computer.
There are some special occasions though, such as when we need to go traveling and we want to travel without a lot of heavy baggage, when it is useful to be able to have an operating system in something like a flash memory stick which is small enough to carry in one's pocket.
Laptops can be easily stolen especially when people have to stop at places where they will be surrounded by strangers. In that case one would not care if the hard drive might last longer.
Laptops (or a USB external hard drive) can be accidentally dropped and broken, compared with a USB flash memory which can take quite a bit of physical punishment and remain unaffected. I have read that military equipment uses flash memory in preference to hard disk drives in many instances due to it's superior ability to withstand shocks.
Also, when we need something we can install many programs in for helping freinds fix their computers, Ubuntu installed in a flash memory is much better than a LiveCD. We can install the programs we want in the USB flash stick and they will always be there ready to use again. When we use a LiveCD, we need to install some programs every time we boot the CD if the program is not already included in the CD.
Flash memory technology is advancing, and getting more reliable and at the same time, getting more affordable.
Good quality modern flash memory is quite a lot different now than the flash memory we used to buy just one or two years ago. If we bother to take the time to do a little reading and research before we spend our money on a new flash memory stick we can probably buy one which will last as long or longer than a hard disk drive, without spending very much more money.
There are new computers which use flash memory instead of a hard disk drive,
ASUS | Eee PC
I have spent quite some time googling on this subject and I still can't find any convincing looking tests which indicate that flash memory is really that bad. I have found a test which seems to indicate it will probably last as long as a hard disk drive. I don't have the link for that right now but I will find it and add it to this post later.
EDIT: I think these were the links I was thinking of, Squeak! - How Solid is Hard Disk's Future?, and SSD Myths and Legends - "write endurance"
EDIT: And this one too, War of the Disks: Hard Disk Drives vs. Flash Solid State Disks
Quoted from the above link:
Reliability
In terms of reliability, conventional HDDs pale when compared to SSDs. The absence of mechanical arms and spinning platters is the reason behind its
reliability. In demanding environments, SSDs provide the type of ruggedness required for mobile applications. Unlike the HDD, SSD's can withstand extreme shock and vibration with data integrity and without any danger of data loss. This feature is very important in industrial applications where exposure to highly combustible materials and electromagnetic radiation are typical. Their ability to deliver unnerving performance in extreme conditions also makes SSD play a vital role in military operations, be it in defense, aerospace or aviation applications. Military applications require, in most cases, an operating temperature range of -60°C to +95°C. Shock, vibration, and temperature ratings of HDDs cannot comply with military standards, only SSDs can.
Regards, Herman
Last edited by Herman; August 6th, 2008 at 11:19 AM.
Ubuntu user since 2004 (Warty Warthog)
Bookmarks