Yes, but I was talking about the past continuing to the present, not the present exclusively.
I wouldn't mind a switch too much, but I really can't say I like KDE.
The last time I used KDE (a few months ago) it seemed dated and clunky, and I hated the fact that Konqueror was just that, conquering every aspect of the system. It reminded me too much of Windows Explorer.
I would probably stay with Ubuntu even if they switched fully to KDE. It would take a LOT of getting used to, but I think I could tolerate such a change.
Long Live TechTV!!
"Diane, I'm holding in my hands a small box of chocolate bunnies."
-Special Agent Dale Cooper
If Ubuntu ever moved to KDE (not going to happen), there will be a Gubuntu.
Mono can be removed you know.
A Fedora user
And XFCE is a light weight version of Gnome and to be honest I don't know how much mono is still in there.
Wrong. Nothing in the "core" of GNOME is written in Mono; only certain peripheral apps are, and they all have alternatives.but now GNOME depends to much in technology that has a lot to do with microsoft, there are too many dependencies to MONO.
Ubuntu only ships Tomboy and F-Spot, which you can easily remove.tomboy, banshee, beagle etc, all depend on MONO....
Lets not forget that Gnome, KDE, XFCE etc are only operating on top of Linux (Ubuntu) ... its easy to switch but the basic distro is still the same.
I agree. I don't bother with Kubuntu anymore simply because so much random crap breaks due to lack of support.Rather, I think Canonical should increase their support for Kubuntu and Xubuntu to the same level as Ubuntu, both of which are treated as second-class citizens.
Choice. Yours to make, and Ubuntu will continue to offer it. I hope!!
~~ Ubuntu Forums Firefox/Flock Menu ~~ Ubuntu User Number 206 ~~ Linux user number 403379 ~~
~~ If someone asks you to sudo rm -rf anything don't do it. ~~
Bookmarks