Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: ubuntu vs viasta

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Beans
    6,040

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by Chymera
    Reporting a crash is like getting slapped and then asked how it felt
    Except that it helps you not get slapped again.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    France
    Beans
    7,100
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by Chymera View Post
    6) Linux systems don't get bloated as much as windows systems
    This is entirely true... however, when i was using windows, i avoided the issue by freshly installing the os twice a year (the bloating usually becomes annoying after some 6 months of use)... In Ubuntu, in order to keep getting the newest stuff (and avoid upgrading, which is a total mess), I also have to do a new install, also, every 6 months.
    You do ?

    I don't, i'm using ubuntu since hoary and i have always upgraded with no problem. Sorry but this argument is really irrelevant for me.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    AU
    Beans
    590
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by 23meg View Post
    Except that it helps you not get slapped again.
    It's not to say that i never reported a crash, i did, some 3-4 times, and neither ms nor ubuntu ever got them fixed.... ms actually fixed it eventually but on the next release

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    AU
    Beans
    590
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by frodon View Post
    You do ?

    I don't, i'm using ubuntu since hoary and i have always upgraded with no problem. Sorry but this argument is really irrelevant for me.
    Well i was referring to my machine, obviously, or else i would have posted the ram usage of your machine

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    AU
    Beans
    590
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingsley View Post
    Back to the first part of your post. How is a legal copy of Vista better than an illegal copy?
    First of all you have access to the official updates (you can also have that via an illegal copy, if you call a stolen legal copy illegal)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /home
    Beans
    1,058

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    I don't know what you did to make Ubuntu use 900 mb of RAM. On my computer it uses a little more than 400 mb with Rhythmbox, Liferea, and Compiz running.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    The former asjdfwejqrfjcvm msz34rq33
    UbuntuForums member #98464 | Ubuntu Help & Support
    Never run any command unless you understand exactly what it will do. [link]

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Beans
    6,040

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by Chymera View Post
    It's not to say that i never reported a crash, i did, some 3-4 times, and neither ms nor ubuntu ever got them fixed.... ms actually fixed it eventually but on the next release
    Good; keep reporting them. That way there's a chance they'll be fixed.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    UK
    Beans
    393

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingsley View Post
    Back to the first part of your post. How is a legal copy of Vista better than an illegal copy?

    With an illegally activated copy of Vista, you have to keep an eye on what updates you install - and generally take a lot more care when connecting to Microsoft.

    When SP1 for vista is released, it will not be a problem for legal vista owners - whereas everybody else will probabaly be looking for workarounds to stop the OEM emulation fixes being nuked.



    In regards to the OP, I have had a very similar experience with Vista. In fact I have found that Vista works a lot better with my hardware - most notably wireless/keyboard and trackpad.

    Vista uses Ram in a very different manner to Ubuntu. It is unfair to compare the 2 by just viewing system monitor.
    My Vista install is every bit as 'snappy' and responsive as my Ubuntu install. It is also just as stable.
    Asus 1015px
    Macbook Pro 4.1

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    AU
    Beans
    590
    Distro
    Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Quote Originally Posted by 23meg View Post
    Good; keep reporting them. That way there's a chance they'll be fixed.
    Since you are an ubuntu member you're probably familliar with the heap of never-read bug reports in launchpad... It's like writing a complaint letter to the government, chances are it won't be read, and chances are that people reading it will be too busy making some constitutions which end up crashing the original constitution during upgrade

    ... if you understand what i mean

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Beans
    405

    Re: ubuntu vs viasta

    Wow your linux experience suck.
    I haven't tried Vista, and probably never will.

    But most people report Vista as worse than XP, and my experience is that Ubuntu runs better than XP, or at least equally well, on 4 different systems.

    I know a LOT of people that have removed Vista from their systems, and only one person I know use VISTA.
    Unfortunately some of the people I know have had to buy a new copy of Windows XP, which I get a little bit angry about, because Microsoft make twice the money on a lousy product.

    Several people i know have bought new laptops recently, they have all expressed much discontent that Vista is slow, their old programs don't work, they can't do stuff they could on their old laptop, and it takes forever to boot.
    Some even thought the stores were scamming them, because their brand new laptop worked so poorly.

    I haven't had your poor experience with any of the programs you mention, so I can't offer much help on it.
    Except maybe you have some media files with bad headers.
    Is it the same files that cause the crashes with Amarok?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •