Super PI Ubuntu - How fast is your cpu?

[kapetr]

Who has comm with the construction "egrep '.*total$'" ?!

There a no "total" lines - neither in time nor in pi command.

It is enough to run:

hugo@duron650:~$ time pi 1048576 >/dev/null

real 0m11.626s
user 0m10.265s
sys 0m0.336s
hugo@duron650:~$

on my Sempron 2700+ (Socket A at 1.9Ghz)

BTW - There must be a great difference between SuperPI an PI.

e.g. Intel i3-530 takes 15s for SuperPI 1M - an I really don't thing, my CPU is faster


--kapetr

[moster]

What is wrong with this thread_ Where is bulldozer and core7?

[Dlambert]

What is wrong with this thread_ Where is bulldozer and core7?

Not many Linux users are using such hardware yet. I mean, that is top of the line and not everyone can afford it nowadays.

[vayu]

satyam@prajipati:~$ time pi 1048576 >/dev/null

real 0m1.415s
user 0m1.350s
sys 0m0.050s


In 2005 on this thread I posted this:
End of calculation. Time= 37.716 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.239 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.955( 1.011) Sec.

[Lucradia]

My Windows Super PI:

512,000


1,000,000

[SL666]

time pi 1048576 >/dev/null

real 0m1.339s
user 0m1.310s
sys 0m0.010s

[moster]

[QUOTE=Lucradia;12064334]My Windows Super PI:


and what is your configuration?

[Artemis3]

You should forget super pi and go with Systester. super pi is not even multi threaded, so its results are meaningless.

Systester on the other hand can properly use all your cpu cores.

[Dlambert]

You should forget super pi and go with Systester. super pi is not even multi threaded, so its results are meaningless.

Systester on the other hand can properly use all your cpu cores.

But not 6 cores

[Lucradia]

My Windows Super PI:

and what is your configuration?

See my signature. Can't use Super PI 1.8 for windows, as it gives "Access is denied" no matter what perms I give it, or if I run it as admin, or via CMD as admin. So I have to use the older 1.5 version.