HOWTO: Bleeding edge e17 with updater script!

[darkmatter]

All right. I hate to be a pest, but...

I am doing the manual build now. Checked the CVS commits and see nothing changed that would do this. During the make of edje I get this:

../../src/lib/.libs/libedje.so: undefined reference to `evas_smart_below_get_set'
../../src/lib/.libs/libedje.so: undefined reference to `evas_smart_above_get_set'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [edje] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rob/cvs/e17/libs/edje/src/bin'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rob/cvs/e17/libs/edje/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rob/cvs/e17/libs/edje'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Anyone know why? What may be causing that? I have already built evas and that compiled fine.

Thoughts?

Stupid question, but did you run ldconfig after building evas?

[Stormy Eyes]

Stupid question, but did you run ldconfig after building evas?

Not if he was using the script, unless the script calls ldconfig after each build.

[darkmatter]

Not if he was using the script, unless the script calls ldconfig after each build.

He had stated in his post that he was trying the MANUAL build, which is why I asked...

[KageKeeper]

Stupid question, but did you run ldconfig after building evas?

Not a stupid question, but yes, I ran sudo ldconfig after building evas.

[elpresidente]

Attempted fr0om script and came to this. I searched for some indication of how to fix this but came up with nothing.

=== Building: e17/libs/engrave... ===

make: *** No rule to make target `clean'.  Stop.

 => Autofoo: e17/libs/engrave

Running aclocal...
Running autoheader...
configure.in:17: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
autoconf/programs.m4:438: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
aclocal.m4:7017: AM_PROG_LEX is expanded from...
configure.in:17: the top level
Running autoconf...
configure.in:17: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
autoconf/programs.m4:438: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
aclocal.m4:7017: AM_PROG_LEX is expanded from...
configure.in:17: the top level
Running libtoolize...
Running automake...
Makefile.am:2: require version 1.5, but have 1.4-p6
src/bin/Makefile.am:1: require version 1.5, but have 1.4-p6

Any suggestions as to what I should do?

[regeya]

I wonder how many years E17 will be "bleeding edge"?

I wonder if it'll make the decade mark?

I don't remember what the first E17/EFM announcement was, or when, but the oldest I could find was more than five years ago, and I could have sworn I'd read about e17 code in '99, which would make it more like 6 years, which means we're more than halfway to the decade point.

Can't wait until 2009, when the next e17 rewrite goes pre-alpha!

[KageKeeper]

Attempted fr0om script and came to this. I searched for some indication of how to fix this but came up with nothing.

=== Building: e17/libs/engrave... ===

make: *** No rule to make target `clean'.  Stop.

 => Autofoo: e17/libs/engrave

Running aclocal...
Running autoheader...
configure.in:17: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
autoconf/programs.m4:438: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
aclocal.m4:7017: AM_PROG_LEX is expanded from...
configure.in:17: the top level
Running autoconf...
configure.in:17: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times
autoconf/programs.m4:438: AC_DECL_YYTEXT is expanded from...
aclocal.m4:7017: AM_PROG_LEX is expanded from...
configure.in:17: the top level
Running libtoolize...
Running automake...
Makefile.am:2: require version 1.5, but have 1.4-p6
src/bin/Makefile.am:1: require version 1.5, but have 1.4-p6

Any suggestions as to what I should do?

Do a:

sudo apt-get install automake1.5

And you should be ok I think.

[elpresidente]

Do a:

sudo apt-get install automake1.5

And you should be ok I think.

Just tried it and got:

Package automake1.5 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package automake1.5 has no installation candidate

[KageKeeper]

Just tried it and got:

Package automake1.5 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package automake1.5 has no installation candidate

Oops...I meant automake1.7

Same command, but 1.7. That is what is required anyway.


Sorry.

[elpresidente]

Oops...I meant automake1.7

Same command, but 1.7. That is what is required anyway.


Sorry.

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
automake1.7 is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not upgraded.

Hmmm. Doesn't quite make sense to me.