I have a question about “persistence,” in the context of making a bootable LIVE K/Ubuntu USB flash drive.
If we make the stick persistent, an example of what we want would be to store various * static * data/configurations. Example: The background image on the Desktop (set once and for all); the selection of icons on the kicker panel; configuration/preference settings for the resident web browser, the word processor OOo Writer, and so on. These items are set once and for all and do not change—they are only “read.”
An example of what, I would think, we do NOT want would be for the LIVE K/Ubuntu (on flash drive) to be constantly writing to the flash drive such things as variable files, tmp files (both /tmp and /var/tmp), swap, and such things. There is the issue of “wearing out” the stick with re-write cycles.
In fact, one of the references raises the question (“Outstanding Questions”):
“Every single disk write goes to the USB stick, which GNOME loves to do all the time.”
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Li...0e31f46cae5951
We know that Puppy Linux (on LIVE USB flash drive) is specially designed to “optimize” this performance criterion (eliminate disk writes to the USB flash drive), whereas, I’ve read that Knoppix on a USB stick is a bad idea for this reason (“wear-out" performance).
Do we know where the current “persistent” fix stands with respect to the wear-out criterion on USB flash drives? Is this an issue?
==> What *exactly* gets written to the persistent LIVE stick?
Bookmarks