Landscape Orientation for Issue #4

[catfacts]

This isnt meant to be taken the wrong way but ronnie is really busy, Im sure he would send someone the scribus file and they could make it a portrait version that we could put up.

[ronniet]

I've learned the hard way that you can not please all of the people all of the time.

When we first released Full Circle in portrait mode all I got was emails saying: 'portrait sucks, we want landscape, like Tux magazine had!' So I made it landscape. So now I get emails saying 'we want portrait mode!'

Damned if I do, damned if I dont.

Full Circle will remain as landscape for the time being...

[ncappel1]

haha, poor Ronnie, is there anyway that we can meet the demand in the middle and start printing at a 45-degree angle, as in halfway between landscape and portrait?

[saxonjf]

Ronnie, don't listen to the complainers.

Don't worry about Tux Mag. It looks dead anyway. Keep up your great work, and do it the way you think best. I've yet to read an issue I didn't like.

Thanks for Full Circle, its great!

[catfacts]

haha, poor Ronnie, is there anyway that we can meet the demand in the middle and start printing at a 45-degree angle, as in halfway between landscape and portrait?

that made my day, I'd have to get a new printer and paper but it would revolutionize the industry

[mrmonday]

haha, poor Ronnie, is there anyway that we can meet the demand in the middle and start printing at a 45-degree angle, as in halfway between landscape and portrait?

+1 for that The perfect compromise

[ronniet]

haha, poor Ronnie, is there anyway that we can meet the demand in the middle and start printing at a 45-degree angle, as in halfway between landscape and portrait?

but do we rotate it 45 degrees to the left? Or to the right?

[mrmonday]

but do we rotate it 45 degrees to the left? Or to the right?

Back to square one now D:

[ronniet]

Back to square one now D:

Welcome to my world...

[catfacts]

No 90 degrees perpendicular to the paper and defy physics