Ubuntu Forums ubuntu.com - launchpad.net - ubuntu help  
Old July 17th, 2007   #1
cfmcguire
First Cup of Ubuntu
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Beans: 8
64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

As most of you know, I went ahead and installed Ubuntu on my AMD dual core machine. Now the question arises: Should I install the 64 bit version and take advantage of all 4 gigs of RAM, or should I just cruise with the 32 bit version for a while? Inquiring minds want to know....
cfmcguire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 17th, 2007   #2
aysiu
HP Mini 1120nr User
 
aysiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: US
My beans are hidden!
Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala
Re: 64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

This thread should help:
How many people actually take advantage of their 64bit processor?
__________________
tutorials | blog |
advice | more advice
aysiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2007   #3
kd7swh
Way Too Much Ubuntu
 
kd7swh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Montana, USA
Beans: 304
Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex (testing)
Send a message via AIM to kd7swh Send a message via MSN to kd7swh Send a message via Skype™ to kd7swh
Re: 64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

what are you doing with the computer? if you are encoding video with ffmpeg or running cedgea (hard core gaming) than the 64-bit maybe a good idea but for most people it makes little difference.

I like the 32-bit versions better most of the time. the packages for i386 seem more stable to me. I don't know why.
kd7swh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 4th, 2009   #4
cfmcguire
First Cup of Ubuntu
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Beans: 8
Re: 64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

Nearly a year and a half after posting this question, I think that I have gotten my answer. I picked up the Linux Pro magazine Ubuntu special edition, and just for yuks installed the 64 bit version. (For evaluation, don't you know Heavily script dependent applications like google mail load a whole lot faster than they do on the 32 bit version of Ubuntu 8.04.
cfmcguire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15th, 2009   #5
ScottMorris
A Carafe of Ubuntu
 
ScottMorris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Beans: 95
Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope
Smile Re: 64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

I recently found a review comparing Ubuntu, Vista and Windows 7 to reach other. One of the cool things they did was compare the x86 (32-bit) to the x86_64 (64-bit) versions. http://www.tuxradar.com/node/33

I know this is kind of late to be posting this, but for anyone looking for info about 64-bit vs. 32-bit it may help the decision process.
__________________
Scott
ScottMorris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #6
lordmorgoth
First Cup of Ubuntu
 
lordmorgoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lebanon
Beans: 7
Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope
Re: 64 bit vs. 32 bit Ubuntu

honestly from personal experience, i never noticed a performance boost with x64 releases.

However what bothered me that my x64 bit installation(s) of 9.04 crashed every single time after installing new packages/updates.

It could be a hardware compatibility problem, but I should mention that I have been using the 32 bit releases and i never faced that particular problem . . .

For now i advise you to stick to 32-bit releases, you wont be using the 4 GB RAM anyways (most probably), and it'll saves you the painful efforts of finding some nasty hardware drivers (like me web cam for example) - which u can always compile from scratch if u want -.
__________________
Hackers pave the way. Others just follow. Be a Hacker !
lordmorgoth is offline   Reply With Quote

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 AM.


vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical © Canonical Ltd. Tango Icons © Tango Desktop Project. bilberry