Well (as of this writing) I have to say I'm impressed with ubuntuforums.org's web server.
I figure it might have been killed by the Slashdot effect. But then maybe it's just too early....
Scott
© 2010 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved.
I never used an OS that I didn't (dis)like.
I'm angrykeyboarder™ and I approved this message.
hmm I tried this recently without any luck, WGA refused to validate me, but then I just copied some files over from my windows pc and from a recent WGA CRACK and I got it to pass. I remember back about a year ago when WGA was newer, when it would validate anything, on an invalid pc all you had to do was set it to compatibility mode, and on wine you didnt need to do anything.
PS: I am impressed that this server is still running after slashdot, but I still definitely notice a slowdown, might be unrelated though
what screen capture app was that? Istanbul? didn't look like it...
"This would make more difference if it made any difference at all; but it doesn't make any difference at all, because you are listening to a conversation among dead businesses." -- Eben Moglen
LinuxChix | Linux User #432169 | Ubuntu User #8495 | IRC: maco @ irc.linuxchix.org or irc.freenode.net
Istanbul is horribly inefficient, but it has worked for me. I use recordmydesktop on the CLI or xvidcap. I had no idea that recordmydesktop had a GUI.
"This would make more difference if it made any difference at all; but it doesn't make any difference at all, because you are listening to a conversation among dead businesses." -- Eben Moglen
A few months ago I had a Titanic struggle getting WGA to recognize my legally purchased copy of Windows XP as legit. To think I could have done it via Ubuntu...
Yet another thing Linux does better than Windows... download Windows updates.![]()
Yeah, they reverse engineer it. However, ReactOS (a project to create an entire free operating system that uses the Windows API, and code from Wine, with a certain amount of code-sharing between projects) went through a major code audit because of allegations that it contained actual code taken from Windows. What I was saying is what if that had happened with Wine. However, in the Slashdot thread, there was a much better and more plausible theory put forth; WGA, if it can't find all the information it wants, is designed to err on the side of caution and just give a valid code signifying a genuine Windows install.
Bookmarks