Any person can install it on any computer without any problems
Anyone can use it once it's already been installed and configured
Every commercial application works on it
Nothing--it's a nonsensical term
It automatically detects most hardware without the need to hunt down drivers
It comes preinstalled on computers so novice users don't have to install it
It's suitable to the needs of most beginner users but not necessarily to most intermediate ones
Windows and nothing else... not even Mac OS X
Works on my desktop
Other (please explain)
Ubuntu addict and loving it
Hi,
I define an average-desktop-user as :
users who have never worked with a computer
users who have only worked with windows XP
users who just want it to work
with ready I mean :
-easy
-works out-of-the-box
-has big benefits for end-users above windows XP
I would like to see a discussion about
-what features ubuntu misses (if any).
-the feasibility of converting the average-desktop-users to ubuntu
Last edited by aysiu; December 20th, 2006 at 04:15 AM. Reason: Attaching image of original poll.
Ubuntu addict and loving it
My opinion :
yes hoary will be ready but requires installation,configuration and intro by nerd
I will install mplayer,xmss,firestarter and thunderbird for them. And do a daily :
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade -t hoary-security -y
apt-get upgrade --trivial-only
apt-get auto-clean
I will give a short introduction and explain how to install software.
I would like to create an custom-hoary-cd when it reaches stable for this purpose.
what features ubuntu misses (if any). :
-warty misses firefox 1.0, thunderbird 1.0 (I hope it will make it into hoary)
-warty misses some "polish" like X.org with neat theme
-warty misses nice graphical configuration tools and wizards (like boot configuration tool)
-hoary most likely will miss : beagle, dashboard, a killer-app
-ubuntu misses real MS office compatibilty (microsofts fault)
the feasibility of converting the average-desktop-users to ubuntu (when I've created my custom hoary-cd):
-if people come to me with computer( read windows) problems I will recommend ubunt
-I will recommend ubuntu to my friends
Let's try to convert them before longhorn
Last edited by ubuntu_demon; December 3rd, 2004 at 02:05 PM.
Ubuntu addict and loving it
Maybe Ubuntu should look for features that mac OS X offers and Ubuntu does not and focus some time to tightly integrate them into ubuntu.
I don't use OS X so I don't know if there are much of such features. Please post them.
Ubuntu addict and loving it
At least on of the following features should be in ubuntu repo in the future :
audio converstation+webcam support for gaim
audio converstation+webcam support for amsn
gnome meeting support for msn
Come on IM developers your software would rock even more if it would have these features.
Frothy Coffee!
Re: ubuntu ready for end-users?
Other: Until Linux gets to the point where when you buy a printer (or other piece of hardware) and along with having Win and Mac drivers it will also have a Linux driver no version of Linux will be ready completely ready for an end-user. I predict this will start happening when I think Linux will start hitting the mainstream in 8-10 years...
Skinny Soy Caramel Ubuntu
whooo that long huh? i think in a few years. gnu/linux is rapidly approaching the mac user base in numbers, will only be a matter of time.Originally Posted by BWF89
Cheerful Ghost - build your game list, write about awesome games and share that with the world. join us!
Way Too Much Ubuntu
"yes warty will be ready but requires installation,configuration and intro by nerd"
If it is configured for them, I think the average person can maintain and use an Ubuntu system. This assumes you teach them how to and the value of using synaptic to update their system.
If they go out and buy printer, they should learn to look in printer configuration to make sure they have drivers for it. Manufacturers aren't going to magically suddenly start providing cups drivers on their install CD's any time soon.
This does not mean Linux, or specifically Ubuntu isn't ready for the desktop. It means the lowest common denominator who is unable to check hardware compatibility might have problems. Even then there is paid support for this OS.
This generation of computer users is a bit smarter than their parents. I have faith that the security issues with Windows XP, and the ones that will be created with the new features in Longhorn will cause quite a few users to come our way.
The ones that adapt will stay. If they cannot they will rot in Windows world. I cannot stress enough though, that gaining Windows users is not worth becoming Windows like to the point that users who like a real Linux desktop will look to other desktop environments and distros.
The average Windows using, webshots using, download.com free Christmas wallpaper/screensaver user isn't even going to file bug reports. While we want them to use the OS, catering to them to the point where Linux users are pushed to more configurable/powerful distros and desktop environments would be folly.
Ubuntu addict and loving it
agreed. But I think a lot of average-desktop-users want nice graphical configuration tools and wizards among other things. Also we need a killer-app. Maybe beagle and dashboard in hoary ?"yes warty will be ready but requires installation,configuration and intro by nerd"
If it is configured for them, I think the average person can maintain and use an Ubuntu system. This assumes you teach them how to and the value of using synaptic to update their system.
There should be stickers with "linux certified : compatible with kernel 2.x and linux distribution y" on hardware boxes. Maybe a linux certified website where everyone can easily see if the hardware he wants to buy is compatible with kernel 2.x and linux distribution y. Or something like this.
If they go out and buy printer, they should learn to look in printer configuration to make sure they have drivers for it. Manufacturers aren't going to magically suddenly start providing cups drivers on their install CD's any time soon.
This does not mean Linux, or specifically Ubuntu isn't ready for the desktop. It means the lowest common denominator who is unable to check hardware compatibility might have problems. Even then there is paid support for this OS.
agreed. Just take the best features from the popular operating systems that are around.This generation of computer users is a bit smarter than their parents. I have faith that the security issues with Windows XP, and the ones that will be created with the new features in Longhorn will cause quite a few users to come our way.
The ones that adapt will stay. If they cannot they will rot in Windows world. I cannot stress enough though, that gaining Windows users is not worth becoming Windows like to the point that users who like a real Linux desktop will look to other desktop environments and distros.
The average Windows using, webshots using, download.com free Christmas wallpaper/screensaver user isn't even going to file bug reports. While we want them to use the OS, catering to them to the point where Linux users are pushed to more configurable/powerful distros and desktop environments would be folly.
I don't think Longhorn is going to be more insecure than windows XP but I do think users will have less privacy and have to trust a big commercial corporation that has a monopoly position.
Staff Emeritus
about the linux certified hardware website:
http://hardware.linuxfaqs.de/
There are many more like this site.
Frothy Coffee!
Re: ubuntu ready for end-users?
THANKS A BUNCH! This will really save alot of headaches when I get my new computer
Posting Permissions
Adv Reply
Bookmarks