Here's something I've never understood: how a country can be in debt, but at the same time, have a lot of money, or at least enough to keep things going.
Take the United States, for example. How is it that the US can have a growing debt, and not have a crisis?
The word "debt," when used to refer to countries, must be a lot different from personal debts that you and I have. When you and I are debt, we have to stop borrowing money, and find a way to make up for the debt, or else there will be serious problems (e.g. living on the streets).
So, what's the answer?
People talk about growing debt, but I don't see any American citizens starving because the debt is as large as it is (there are starving citizens, but they're starving for different reasons). In that case, is debt a "bad" thing at all, since it doesn't seem to have negative consequences?
Some person on Yahoo Answers said the US has more assets than debt. Okay, great. How about paying off the debt before moving things along, and letting the debt stack up like a pile of trash? Personal debt can't pile up, but national debt can....weird.
There's gotta be something I am missing...maybe it's some basic economic principle us laymen, or maybe just I, are missing. Don't hit me on the head for not understanding all this, please!
PS: Let's not turn this into politics. I just want to understand the economics of this.
Bookmarks