Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Restrictive File Attachments

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Huntsville, AL, USA
    Beans
    7,526
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Restrictive File Attachments

    Quote Originally Posted by hyper_ch View Post
    downloading config files et al. is a pain they could [code][/code] them.... basic rule: "Help others to help you!" or put differently "don't make others require to do more work because you're lazy"
    If posting a full, large config file (like an old xorg.conf) I'd rather have the attachment. It is a pain to scroll though 3 or 4 files in code tags.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Beans
    Hidden!
    Distro
    Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron

    Re: Restrictive File Attachments

    I do not like the idea of having to download .sh users have the tendancy to give them chmod 777 ./runstuff.sh && ./runstuff.sh and away for away we are running the remove command.

    If they are posted as text every one passing by can at least have a look with out having to download. I just feel more comfortable knowing that the executable files are publicly being viewed all the time.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •