![]() |
ubuntu.com - launchpad.net - ubuntu help
|
|
|||||||
Ubuntu 9.10 is out!!!
When downloading Ubuntu 9.10 please consider using bittorrent to get your copy of Ubuntu. The Ubuntu Developers Summit for Lucid Lynx will be held the week of 16-Nov-2009 till 20-Nov-2009 in Dallas, TX USA. Visit the the Ubuntu wiki for more information about UDS and how to participate remotely. |
|
The Community Cafe The Community Chat area is for lighthearted and enjoyable discussions, like you might find around a water cooler at work. Almost any non-tech-support topic may be discussed here. Discussions on religion and politics are not allowed, except for politics directly related to free and open source issues. Any topic or discussion that causes problems or drama will be closed. This area is intended for fun and community building, not arguments. Please take those elsewhere. Thanks! |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Quad Shot of Ubuntu
![]() |
KHTML + Firefox?
This idea just pops up in my head...
Well, I have been using Firefox for a while now, I liked its interface and about:config and how extensions and be easily written and stuff... but its Gecko engine is huge and slow and just isn't as up to date as other ones, like khtml... So yea, do you think it is possible to "swap" the html parsing/rendering engines used in Firefox, as in plugging in the khtml in it instead of Gecko?
__________________
Civicsquare, Canberra's online community - Registered Linux User #404403 - Ubuntu User #19426 0ECA 728E 4501 1922 458E 5783 0ABE 141D B30C 2A0B |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Gee! These Aren't Roasted!
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Beans: 170
Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy
|
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
Firefox's interface is XUL-based, which requires Gecko, so probably not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ubuntu Extra Shot
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Beans: 340
Ubuntu Karmic Koala (testing)
|
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
Google for it, a proof-of-concept was made a while back. So this is possible, but it is so much work that it will probably not be done in the forseeable future.
__________________
Syntensity - An open source platform for 3D games |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Fresh Brewed Ubuntu
![]() |
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
Gecko renders the entire Firefox interface (with additional native GUI elements) and provides the JavaScript back-end for Firefox extensions. Take away Gecko and you take away the foundation of Firefox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Extra Foam Sugar Free Ubuntu
![]() |
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
You could more easily realize Konqueror with a good plugin interface (which are written in popular languages just as Python or Ruby)
__________________
simplicity is perfection |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Fresh Brewed Ubuntu
![]() |
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
Quote:
Sorry for being a grammar nazi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Extra Foam Sugar Free Ubuntu
![]() |
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
I was already thinking hard about the sentence as it seemed corrupted to me. Thanks for correcting me, I am a grammar nazi as well (concerning German) - in English I am far away from being good enough for it.
But criticism makes it better.
__________________
simplicity is perfection |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fresh Brewed Ubuntu
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Beans: 894
The Feisty Fawn Testing
|
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
But, as I said in a thread with you before, German is much stricter!
__________________
Me on Launchpad |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Gee! These Aren't Roasted!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Beans: 155
Dapper Drake Testing/
|
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
like been said before, firefox uses gecko, a gtk version of khtml did exist, but don't know what happened to the project.
Heres the url. http://gtk-webcore.sourceforge.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
May the Ubuntu Be With You!
![]() |
Re: KHTML + Firefox?
is it gecko itself that's heavy or is it the firefox associations that it has? I'd rather pop the gecko rendering engine into Konqueror. Konqui has the interface I want, but KHTML gives me a lot of problems.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|