Page 1 of 20 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 194

Thread: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Beans
    5,125
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    I've been noticing phenomenal, Opera-like speeds with Epiphany 1.8.0 in Breezy.

    When viewing long threads on the Forums, Firefox sometimes deadlocks for 1.5 seconds while rendering the page, sometimes even more. Note that this is on an athlon64 3000+ with 1.5GB RAM; not a slow system on any scale! Also, I've seen poor graphical performance with Firefox, even with the UI. Javascript alert() dialogs pop up a window border immediately, but it takes another second or two for the text and buttons to show up -- unacceptable on modern equipment like mine.


    Epiphany doesn't suffer from these issues. The forums load nearly instantly; and even when they don't, I can still browse in other tabs -- the UI isn't frozen.


    I'm currently comparing for a difference in the two browsers. They are using the same Gecko versions, same GCC compile flags...



    It might be extensions; I'll try a clean profile and report back.
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxradar
    Linux's audio architecture is more like the layers of the Earth's crust than the network model, with lower levels occasionally erupting on to the surface, causing confusion and distress, and upper layers moving to displace the underlying technology that was originally hidden

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Beans
    5,125
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Alright, fresh profile, Scrags rendering time test (http://scragz.com/tech/mozilla/test-rendering-time.php) of:


    Firefox: 4.60
    Epiphany: 2.42


    Both browsers were given 5 refreshes each running from the hard drive, and were awarded the lowest they got. Epiphany is nearly twice as fast as Firefox at just raw computational rendering...


    Why is this?
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxradar
    Linux's audio architecture is more like the layers of the Earth's crust than the network model, with lower levels occasionally erupting on to the surface, causing confusion and distress, and upper layers moving to displace the underlying technology that was originally hidden

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Beans
    5,125
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    The official builds (Deer Park and 1.0.6) both render in the 2.10-2.30 second area, with Deer park taking the lead (as one'd expect).


    However, why exactly is Breezy's Firefox so slow?!?
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxradar
    Linux's audio architecture is more like the layers of the Earth's crust than the network model, with lower levels occasionally erupting on to the surface, causing confusion and distress, and upper layers moving to displace the underlying technology that was originally hidden

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Beans
    532

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Jdong,
    I have experienced something out of the ordinary on my system
    Code:
    SysInfo: uname: Linux 2.6.12-8-686 CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.20GHz 2193.131 MHz Bogomips: 4341.76 Mem: 85/250M [||||||||||] Diskspace: 54.30G Free: 43.00G Procs: 63 Uptime: 6 hrs 41 mins 26 secs Load: 0.53 1.04 1.17  | Screen: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 03) Screen Resolution: 1024x768 (24 bpp) wlan0: In: 116.12M Out: 9.33M
    It takes a veeeeeeeeeeeeeery long time for epiphany to load. I have breezy by the way and I installed epiphany from the repo's...

    They guy's on #epiphany on freenode have NO idea whatsoever.


    majikstreet

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Beans
    5,125
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Hmm, it takes a few seconds to launch Epiphany on cold boot, and it launches nearly instantly subsequenly. You have a fairly decent amount of RAM, so that's probably not it....


    What's a "veeeeery long time"? What if you set the startup page to about:blank?
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxradar
    Linux's audio architecture is more like the layers of the Earth's crust than the network model, with lower levels occasionally erupting on to the surface, causing confusion and distress, and upper layers moving to displace the underlying technology that was originally hidden

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Beans
    2,350

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    You need to prelink Epiphany.

    Epiphany loads pages faster, with less CPU power used and uses less RAM overall compared to Firefox in Linux. Firefox in Linux is kinda a lame dog- its the slowest out of the Windows, Linux,OSX versions. When I know I'm going to open a lot of tabs or such (like when I researching) I always use Epiphany.

    The rest of the time I use Firefox and I don't know why when its so much worse. I'm like and adict or something. I don't even adblock anymore so I don't need it. Truth be told if I could theme Epiphany to look like Firefox (or all some Gnome search bar) I would use it full time.
    Those folks who try to impose analog rules on digital content will find themselves on the wrong side of the tidal wave.
    - Mark Shuttleworth

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Beans
    2,350

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Quote Originally Posted by jdong
    Why is this?
    Because the most active version of Firefox is the Windows one. It gets the love.
    Those folks who try to impose analog rules on digital content will find themselves on the wrong side of the tidal wave.
    - Mark Shuttleworth

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Beans
    108
    Distro
    Ubuntu 6.06

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    I also just started using Epiphany on Breezy. It is a LOT faster than firefox, and it's not as ugly as opera.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Beans
    Hidden!

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Quote Originally Posted by poofyhairguy
    You need to prelink Epiphany.

    Epiphany loads pages faster, with less CPU power used and uses less RAM overall compared to Firefox in Linux. Firefox in Linux is kinda a lame dog- its the slowest out of the Windows, Linux,OSX versions. When I know I'm going to open a lot of tabs or such (like when I researching) I always use Epiphany.

    The rest of the time I use Firefox and I don't know why when its so much worse. I'm like and adict or something. I don't even adblock anymore so I don't need it. Truth be told if I could theme Epiphany to look like Firefox (or all some Gnome search bar) I would use it full time.
    I use Smart Bookmars. In my humble opinion they work better than the Firefox search bar. I can type directly in the location bar and I get to search wherever I want from (Wikipedia, google, ___nova, IMDB, wherever I want from). Add to that the no toolbar option and I am a happing epiphaner.
    Sylvia: Look at what you've done to him!
    Christof: I have given Truman the chance to lead a normal life. The world, the place you live in, is the sick place.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cupertino, CA
    Beans
    5,125
    Distro
    Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx

    Re: Epiphany much faster than Firefox??

    Quote Originally Posted by poofyhairguy
    Because the most active version of Firefox is the Windows one. It gets the love.
    Hmm, well, it's the same Gecko rendering engine, compiled with the same compiler and the same everything. Did you see my comment about official Firefox? It's faster, and actually compiled with GCC 3.3... Has GCC 4.0 really gotten that messed up?


    Users of other distros, is there this significant of a difference between Firefox and Epiphany/Galeon?



    There's certainly some sites that set off Firefox's slowness -- Slashdot does it on autoscroll, and the Forums does it. Since I visit the forums the most, that's kind of concerning.



    Either way, I don't remember seeing THIS kind of speed gap back in Hoary days. I still feel it's abnormal.
    Quote Originally Posted by tuxradar
    Linux's audio architecture is more like the layers of the Earth's crust than the network model, with lower levels occasionally erupting on to the surface, causing confusion and distress, and upper layers moving to displace the underlying technology that was originally hidden

Page 1 of 20 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •