Sounds like a good idea; but I'd end up having too much fun closing other people's windows.Originally Posted by UbuWu
Them "Who did that!"
Me "Must have been that bob kid"
It could be good if the computers aren't used often; and you wanted to place them in every room, like at your own home. But if you planned on more than one person using it... good luck my friend.
Luke
check your zipper
You can have as many X sessions running as you like. You would need a video card for each monitor. It is a pain to set up. But it can be done out-of the box with any Xwindows system.
but you will need to have a very good hardware.
Your freedom is worth more than you think. Take advantage of it while you can.
I take Ubuntu
Untrue. I have set up Ubuntu based FreeNX systems with relatively little. The central server was a 1.2GHz Athlon with 512MB RAM, and it was handling 10 users simultaneously running GNOME.Originally Posted by Jad
The clients basically ran a minimal install of Ubuntu, with an X server and an NX client.
Originally Posted by tuxradar
Sure, if you have a nice USB hub & usb input devices.
But seriously, get separate thin-client systems... They don't need to be any more powerful than a basic Pentium I.
Originally Posted by tuxradar
That is the whole thing that ruby backport page is about. You can use one computer with several graphic cards with monitors connected to them and have a seperate keyboard and a mouse for alk of them and you probably won't even notice that you are using the same computer during every day use.Originally Posted by panickedthumb
naive question: would it be possible to have a hydra-headed thin-client using this system
as in, one box that acts as a client to a fat server--with lots of displays & keyboards sprouting out of it?
Even without my (mis)understanding of the concepts, the multiple displays idea strikes me as a great way for libraries to increase the number of catalogue terminals they make available, say.
Bookmarks