Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Beans
    574

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    i will try to install the deb on ubuntu hope will start browse on ubuntu soon because midori and qupzilla are really unstable if found a website with a video

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Beans
    383

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    Firefox 47.0 is available for ubuntu MATE 16.10 PowerPC 


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Beans
    383

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    Firefox 47 is also available for ubuntu MATE 16.04 LTS PowerPC. 


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Beans
    920

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    @zeno74:

    Thanks for the head's up . . . I had just checked that the day before and it wasn't in the tubes . . . . Seems to be once again working . . . .

    e..

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Beans
    383
    Distro
    Lubuntu

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    FF46 is broken on Gentoo as well. I am unning it on my PM G5 and PB G4. Could somone with the issue launch FF in the terminal and post the results? I wondering if it is the same issue...
    iBook G4 1.42GHz Ubuntu-MATE 15.04
    PowerBook G4 1.67 GHz Debian Wheezy

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Beans
    920

    Re: Dist-upgrade &/or new FF in Lu && U-MATE breaks browser??

    @r-l:

    Hey bud, so you are playing with Gentoo these days? This shouldn't be an issue anymore, as of yesterday using apt there was a new kernel and an upgrade for FF . . . 47?? It's working, it still takes a couple minutes to launch, literally . . . and it still takes awhile to load the "restore" pages . . . perhaps such is life in 32 bit . . . but, it's working . . . . Should be in the repos???

    If there is something that needs checking later today perhaps I could do something, but we should be moving on to the next issue in our "testing" of 16.04???? : - )

    e

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •