Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Default Full Disk Encryption insecure? SHA1

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Beans
    6

    Re: Default Full Disk Encryption insecure? SHA1

    Found this on VeraCrypt forums:

    Also, the statement that the underlaying hash function doesn't matter is completely false because there are security requirements that must be fulfilled by the hash function in order to the key derivation to be secure. Otherwise, there will be no need for cryptography and we can stick with 30 years old hash functions like MD4!!
    Anyway, in such security topics, one must carefully check any statement or information before endorsing it or using it. There are many out there who mislead people either on purpose or because they are ignorants of cryptography basics.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    On the edge
    Beans
    872
    Distro
    Ubuntu

    Re: Default Full Disk Encryption insecure? SHA1

    Yes knowledge is power. Educate yourself. Here's a good overview of how a hash function is used in encryption.http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com...ion/encryption


    Here's the presentation of the theoretical crack of sha1. You can reproduce the math if you like.
    http://2012.sharcs.org/slides/stevens.pdf
    Knock knock.
    Race condition.
    Who's there?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •