Absolutely. When sites use components that only work in certain browsers, they're telling other people to go away. For years, competent designers have been building sites that deliver different content to different browsers, based on the capabilities of the browser that's requested the content. This is standard, expected web design. If someone is hosting content that works *only* in the latest version of Flash and only in certain browsers, and not including fallbacks for everyone else, then, as I see it, they don't want me using their site.
If we want to use software that is only available for specific browsers on specific releases of specific operating systems (proprietary or not) then that's a choice we have to make.
Meanwhile, Linux distributions simply repackage the Linux version of Flash retrieved from the Linux repo Adobe maintains. If Adobe chooses not to make the latest Flash available for Linux, there's nothing any Linux distribution can do about it. (In fact, folks who use Fedora and other distros that do not package Flash typically install the Adobe repo and get Flash directly from there.)
Bookmarks